Originally posted by Atoon All too often you get to choose from Ndisle OR Ndisle. How hard would it be to list the EXACT requirements for a map to be accepted into LWA rotation, have a contest for map makers with winners getting 2-6 months paid subscription. Or we could just ignore it & pretend like all is well.
Originally posted by dedalos Its hard because they change. You start a map today and by the time you are done the reqs change and your work is junk. Almost as motivating as the tools used to create a map
Originally posted by Krusty No, there have been map rejections because the countries have been unbalanced, there are limits on how close fields can be, it must have a certain amount of strat (can't make a map with no strat, for example).There are lots of "requirements" -- they're just unwritten. That's the problem, IMO. HTC needs to codify what they will and will not accept.
Originally posted by Krusty I think I've seen that sticky, too. I'm just listing examples, is all. Recently all I've heard (mapping wise) is that so-and-so's map got rejected, followed by whats-his-name's map also getting rejected, etc.What with the crappy TE tool as-is, you'd think that HTC would make things easier (unless..... they don't WANT more maps? )
Originally posted by Jackal1 HT is only here to make you miserable. That`s why he hired Skuzz.
Originally posted by SFCHONDO They spent time on a new plane (B-25) when we really don't need any more planes at the moment. More then half aren't used now.
Originally posted by DadRabit I miss Calvin and Hobbes.............
Originally posted by SFCHONDO As usual taking things out of context. Intellegent person knows what I am getting at. 1 more plane should be a 2nd priority and maps should be #1 priority. Can't believe you didn't understand my post.