Author Topic: Reducing global red meat consumption by 10 percent (Read 811 times)

Holden McGroin · « **on:** September 13, 2007, 06:37:33 AM »

Quote

LONDON - Eating less meat could help slow global warming by reducing the number of livestock and thereby decreasing the amount of methane flatulence from the animals, scientists said on Thursday.

In a special energy and health series of the medical journal The Lancet, experts said people should eat fewer steaks and hamburgers. Reducing global red meat consumption by 10 percent, they said, would cut the gases emitted by cows, sheep and goats that contribute to global warming.

Sounds like a bunch of bull s***

Xargos · « **Reply #1 on:** September 13, 2007, 06:43:50 AM »

If they really cared about the earth they would spend their research trying to find us other planets to colonize instead of dictating how often a sheep should fart.

lazs2 · « **Reply #2 on:** September 13, 2007, 08:09:21 AM »

Once the whole "man made global warming" thing became a debate.... it pretty much ended... they got nothing.

About the only country that is really still buying the whole scam is england... and look what they have been reduced to? talking about a 10% reduction in cow farts...

The man made global warming thing came in like a lion but went out like a cow fart...

lazs

john9001 · « **Reply #3 on:** September 13, 2007, 08:10:10 AM »

"methane flatulence ", do i see a new fuel source here?

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #4 on:** September 13, 2007, 08:13:37 AM »

I'm doing my part to quickly kill and eat as many of these ugly "Methane" producers as possible.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #5 on:** September 13, 2007, 08:21:03 AM »

As I have stated in another thread.
I dont care if it causes the earth to heat up and toast like a marshmallow

I aint giving up my beef!

C(Sea)Bass · « **Reply #6 on:** September 13, 2007, 08:36:59 AM »

wouldn't eating less meat mean there are more living animals thereby being counter productive?

moot · « **Reply #7 on:** September 13, 2007, 08:55:52 AM »

Those animals are bred.

C(Sea)Bass · « **Reply #8 on:** September 13, 2007, 08:58:51 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by moot
Those animals are bred.

i thought animals were meat, not bread.

lazs2 · « **Reply #9 on:** September 13, 2007, 09:01:47 AM »

what it boils down to is that if you are married to the whole greenhouse gas myth then you have to see the elephants in the room... water vapor and methane.... man can't cause water vapor (95%+ of greenhouse gas) and co2 is becoming a non event (man made or otherwise) sooo....

You are stuck with methane if you are one of the man made global warming acolytes... man can affect methane sooo... lets run that one up the old flagpole and see how many sheep salute.

lazs

C(Sea)Bass · « **Reply #10 on:** September 13, 2007, 09:03:45 AM »

I personally just added to the problem:D

JBA · « **Reply #11 on:** September 13, 2007, 09:05:53 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
The man made global warming thing came in like a lion but went out like a cow fart...lazs

If I can squeeze that into my sig. limit I will...

LMAO

Maverick · « **Reply #12 on:** September 13, 2007, 11:31:01 AM »

Eat more free range chicken! They are overrunning the forests of South America and devastating the ecology.

Tiger · « **Reply #13 on:** September 13, 2007, 11:33:42 AM »

eating less meat = more cows living = more cow farts = more methane = more global warming

It's the vegetarians fault !!!

68Hawk · « **Reply #14 on:** September 13, 2007, 12:26:45 PM »

PETA is evil.