Author Topic: New Ground Vehicles (Read 809 times)

ssDruid · « **on:** October 03, 2007, 07:43:19 AM »

Is it time for some new ground vehicles?

Where are the Panther variants, Stug variants, King Tiger and the rest of the Allied vehicles used during the war.

Are we ever going to see these vehicles in upcoming patches.

If it is about the lack of data, there are plenty of sources out there with the information on every vehicle.

rednex21 · « **Reply #1 on:** October 03, 2007, 04:01:10 PM »

Ok...can someone tell me what the name of a modified M3 with that big *** cannon/howitzer. now thats what i'd like to have in the game

Nilsen · « **Reply #2 on:** October 03, 2007, 04:30:13 PM »

This is Aces High so i hope we see more planes AND updates to the planes we have before we get any more ground stuff.

rednex21 · « **Reply #3 on:** October 03, 2007, 04:41:10 PM »

Well...if they wanted it to be just about aces "high" they wouldn't have added gv's in the thing:noid

Nilsen · « **Reply #4 on:** October 03, 2007, 04:46:49 PM »

Well i guess there is a reason for the vast majority of the rides to be planes.

I dont mind bombing gvs and the whines that often follow, but the day even close to half the online population drive around on the ground is the day ill find another game. Plenty of ground warfare games around and I THINK Aces High should always remain 90% or more focused on the air warfare part.

Wolfala · « **Reply #5 on:** October 04, 2007, 09:55:47 PM »

Wouldn't mind an MLRS type of rocket artillery with a pretty long reload time.

Helm · « **Reply #6 on:** October 07, 2007, 09:10:53 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nilsen
Well i guess there is a reason for the vast majority of the rides to be planes.

I dont mind bombing gvs and the whines that often follow, but the day even close to half the online population drive around on the ground is the day ill find another game. Plenty of ground warfare games around and I THINK Aces High should always remain 90% or more focused on the air warfare part.

....hmmm ...that sounds like a whine to me???

Nilsen · « **Reply #7 on:** October 07, 2007, 09:26:18 AM »

lol no

rednex21 · « **Reply #8 on:** October 08, 2007, 01:23:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Helm
....hmmm ...that sounds like a whine to me???

agreed:D

Ack-Ack · « **Reply #9 on:** October 08, 2007, 03:28:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rednex21
Well...if they wanted it to be just about aces "high" they wouldn't have added gv's in the thing:noid

GV have always been and will always be a secondary part of the game. The main focus has always been and will always be fighter combat.

I agree with Nilsen, while it would be nice to see some additional vehicles it shouldn't be at the expense of adding new fighters or revamping the ones that still need to be brought up to AH2 standards.

ack-ack

rednex21 · « **Reply #10 on:** October 10, 2007, 12:17:40 PM »

He;s just mad cuz he stinks in a GV:D

Carry on,
Banshee7

Arlo · « **Reply #11 on:** October 10, 2007, 05:42:18 PM »

Like the game really *needs* more German armor anyhoo. That and the atom bomb.

Spikes · « **Reply #12 on:** October 10, 2007, 06:08:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Wolfala
Wouldn't mind an MLRS type of rocket artillery with a pretty long reload time.

what about the MARS?

Gixer · « **Reply #13 on:** October 10, 2007, 10:21:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ack-Ack
GV have always been and will always be a secondary part of the game. The main focus has always been and will always be fighter combat.

I agree with Nilsen, while it would be nice to see some additional vehicles it shouldn't be at the expense of adding new fighters or revamping the ones that still need to be brought up to AH2 standards.

ack-ack

And I agree with Ack-Ack

~~...-Gixer~~

rednex21 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 10, 2007, 11:02:37 PM »

Although.........it would be nice to have the P-39. But the Hurri 1 works for me