Originally posted by Ripsnort
I was about to call "B.S." on your statement until I looked it up:
So, I keep hearing that we're in Iraq because of oil...yet we have plenty coming in from Canada and Mexico...hmmm....
Be very careful Rip. You are dangerously close to seeing things from my POV.
We can do this and do it very easily.
Using switchgrass as a primary fuel, putting all idle allotment land and government property into production, we could easily produce 30% of our consumption.
The problem is there is no profit for anyone to milk. A/D/M (Archer/Daniels/Midland) has the corn market sewn up and is using the flyover states to stop any diversion of funds for manufacturing switchgrass based fuels. This is Corn Country!
Everyone loves to bash Exxon/Mobil for profit gouging, but nobody is paying attention to the harm A/D/M is doing to our nation. A/D/M is concerned about making a profit for it's executives and shareholders. It has Millions invested in corn production and wants to see a return on it's investment. It could care less about you and I.
Why on earth wouldn't we we grow what we absolutely know would work and work well? Because A/D/M is contributing to the campaigns of corn state politicians. Anyone that runs against them is labeled "anti-farm" and "anti-american", a death sentence in mid-america.
Meanwhile, Unleaded is $2.99 a gallon and Exxon/Mobil turns another record profit while the prairie wind blows across an empty plain.
Farmers want to work. The nation needs the product. Where is the downside?