People will say the same thing no matter what is added, including the IAR-80.
I disagree with this ride. We don't NEED 10 Hogs, 14 Jugs, 20 Spitfires before some others. This is a ride that gave the USAAF fits. This is a very capable ride from a "lesser known participant of WWII." Absolutely folks will disagree with what I just said and IDGAF.
I disagree with this ride. We don't NEED 10 Hogs, 14 Jugs, 20 Spitfires before some others. This is a ride that gave the USAAF fits. This is a very capable ride from a "lesser known participant of WWII."
Very cool looking plane. I'm all for it.BTW though, don't you suspect the reason it gave the USAAF abit of trouble was that they were mistaking a plane than handles and performs alot like an early-model Spit for 190s, which handle, well, like 190s?
If they put it to vote ever again I commit to voting for this plane.
If they ever do a vote like that again, we'll get another American aircraft regardless of what you or I vote for.