Author Topic: Iar-80  (Read 4969 times)

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #90 on: March 07, 2009, 06:28:12 PM »
People will say the same thing no matter what is added, including the IAR-80.

I disagree with this ride.    We don't NEED 10 Hogs, 14 Jugs, 20 Spitfires before some others.   This is a ride that gave the USAAF fits.   This is a very capable ride from a "lesser known participant of WWII."   

Absolutely folks will disagree with what I just said and IDGAF.   
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline thedudee95

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 218
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #91 on: March 07, 2009, 09:19:58 PM »
I disagree with this ride.    We don't NEED 10 Hogs, 14 Jugs, 20 Spitfires before some others.   This is a ride that gave the USAAF fits.   This is a very capable ride from a "lesser known participant of WWII."   

Absolutely folks will disagree with what I just said and IDGAF.   
i agree with masherbrum.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #92 on: March 08, 2009, 07:34:12 PM »
I disagree with this ride. We don't NEED 10 Hogs, 14 Jugs, 20 Spitfires before some others.   This is a ride that gave the USAAF fits.   This is a very capable ride from a "lesser known participant of WWII."   
I know. But a fair amount, if not a majority of people, will say 'zomg its not flown 'smuch as da spit16 its a hangar queen'.
Doesn't mean I would agree with them.

Offline texastc316

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • Mighty 316th
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #93 on: March 09, 2009, 02:46:03 PM »
add it, and we will come
TexsTC-CO/Court Jester-Mighty 316th FS "CREEPING DEATH"  in MA/FSO

The eager pilots are not experienced. And the experienced not eager.

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline ShrkBite

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 322
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #94 on: March 10, 2009, 10:45:44 PM »
do it do it do it

Offline Ranger45

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 87
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #95 on: March 14, 2009, 09:34:07 AM »
If they put it to vote ever again I commit to voting for this plane.

Offline BnZs

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #96 on: March 14, 2009, 12:05:54 PM »
Very cool looking plane. I'm all for it.

BTW though, don't you suspect the reason it gave the USAAF abit of trouble was that they were mistaking a plane than handles and performs alot like an early-model Spit for 190s, which handle, well, like 190s?
"Crikey, sir. I'm looking forward to today. Up diddly up, down diddly down, whoops, poop, twiddly dee - decent scrap with the fiendish Red Baron - bit of a jolly old crash landing behind enemy lines - capture, torture, escape, and then back home in time for tea and medals."

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #97 on: March 14, 2009, 12:23:16 PM »
Very cool looking plane. I'm all for it.

BTW though, don't you suspect the reason it gave the USAAF abit of trouble was that they were mistaking a plane than handles and performs alot like an early-model Spit for 190s, which handle, well, like 190s?

My statement still stands.   
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #98 on: March 14, 2009, 12:32:00 PM »
The 152 was a questionable addition?  :lol

You think 4 years is a long time to wait?  How long did the Finns wait for the Brewster?
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #99 on: March 14, 2009, 04:17:23 PM »
If they put it to vote ever again I commit to voting for this plane.
If they ever do a vote like that again, we'll get another American aircraft regardless of what you or I vote for.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #100 on: March 14, 2009, 04:37:55 PM »
If they ever do a vote like that again, we'll get another American aircraft regardless of what you or I vote for.

So true! :lol
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Ranger45

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 87
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #101 on: March 15, 2009, 11:01:30 AM »
If they ever do a vote like that again, we'll get another American aircraft regardless of what you or I vote for.

Fine I think we ought to fill up the wish list page with nothin but IAR-80 wishes until we by god have a IAR-80.  We can do a internet filibuster, why not it works for politicians.  Unbearable whining and annoyance until we get what we want.   :cry  :aok

Offline Ranger45

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 87
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #102 on: March 15, 2009, 06:15:18 PM »
I have thought about it a little and started woundering if Hitech would even be able to dig up enough info to even get close with the flight model.  There really doesn't seem to be a lot of info on this plane and what info there is seems to counterdict it's self.  I am sure that they know where to get better info than I do but I still think it would be a tough one for them.

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #103 on: March 16, 2009, 02:13:11 PM »
Iar-80 is a great choice.  It adds more diversity and heck looks like fun.

+1
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Iar-80
« Reply #104 on: March 16, 2009, 03:09:04 PM »
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!