Author Topic: Suggestion,Vehicles lots more  (Read 978 times)

Offline machiel15

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Suggestion,Vehicles lots more
« on: October 22, 2007, 07:07:54 AM »
hello.
Sorry for the big posts, much pic's, srry for 2nd post but its all suggestions and it can be usefull

1.
I've seen the m3, goon etc.
but what you think of the truck?

it could carry 10 troops, and its quite fast.

2.yeh, its war so there are vehicles fighting, But..

You got a river.
a bridge
The bridge is down.
So you cant go over the river.
(make it so that you need ride long for next bridge)
a costum bridge will be put on the river in dutch its called:
Pontonbrug
(picture is from around this time)
Picture:


im searching for one from 1940 or later.
This is.. dont know but i know how it looked like in the world war, in cuijk(Netherlands)
There is one part of the old old pontonbrug.
Heres a pic:(not as old but older)





Picture: Place where a floating bridge(pontonbrug) war bullet holes in church
« Last Edit: October 22, 2007, 07:58:51 AM by machiel15 »

Offline machiel15

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2007, 07:46:57 AM »
srry for 2nd post but i got more suggestions.

tactic board, usefull for missions:
'

105mm Howitser (artillery? aa?))


Weapons, make it more realistic the pistol and walking is not quite nice(srry)
Maybe its better to have(computer troops in a town like 20)
You must bring troops those troops got guns to take out the others, Then you need 10 to take the town, So you need like 4 trucks or m3's.
When defence the 20 automatic troops that are there will die if enemy getting more troops to town, so you need to bring troops in town to defend. and bomb those vehicles of enemy with troops (maybe good idea)


Landing's craft, Could move a tank in it.


Flakvierling(usefull basedefense)


Artillery, to hit a base some(hard to shoot but lots distance)


Its just Idea's.
I gave idea's i am not a modder or something, but i could help further.

(dont be angry if big pictures)
« Last Edit: October 22, 2007, 07:53:47 AM by machiel15 »

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4056
      • Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group
Re: Vehicles and others..
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2007, 07:53:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by machiel15
hello.
1.
I've seen the m3, goon etc.
but what you think of the truck?

it could carry 10 troops, and its quite fast.



I can agree with this. What's the harm in just a good ol' fashion  army truck?
Operations Officer - Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group
C.O.: EZGlider
X.O.: Steely
Just a bunch of old farts having a great time raining destruction down upon the enemy.
https://www.dickweedhbg.com/

Offline Tiger

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 766
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2007, 09:11:53 AM »
I like the landing craft for takign troops rather than LVT's.  
But that would mean making the maproom closer to the shore, or making so the troops can run further than they can now.

Offline machiel15

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2007, 01:13:01 PM »
or make it so that troops can run really long, but must fight for town, with their guns..

Offline Speed55

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1263
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2007, 02:59:52 PM »
I really like the buildable bridge idea, and have thought about it in the past too.

I know the coding would be tremendous, but imagine if:

To make it simple you had another option on the m3, which was building materials.

You spawn your m3, and drive to a river,  click drop materails and a bridge section would appear. The next guy does the same thing, and so on, creating a bridge to cross a channel or river.  

After the bridge is created a new spawn point would appear at it's beginning and stay there until the entire bridge is completely destroyed.

The bridge sections would be destroyable by bombs/ rockets/torps.  

Maybe in the future sometime i guess.
"The lord loves a hangin', that's why he gave us necks." - Ren & Stimpy

Ingame- Ozone

Offline JimBeam

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 322
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2007, 03:47:29 PM »
i hate to rain on your parade but i think HTC should stick to creating new aircraft and revamping the old ones
JimBeam 367th "Dynamite Gang"

"In my experience JimBeam never goes down easy" -wil3ur

Pilots...looking down on people since 1903

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2007, 03:49:59 PM »
I say yes to the trucks, landing crafts, and arty.

I say no to troop fights, more guns, and Flakvierling (we don't want LTARs in those things :D )

As for a tactical map for missions, I think the waypoints you can set on the map for missions is good enough.

rednex21

  • Guest
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2007, 04:13:56 PM »
I think Higgins Boats would be a good addition.  They were very important to WW2 (Especially D-Day).


Banshee7

Offline machiel15

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2007, 04:22:16 PM »
i think i brought some big nice idea's ;)

rednex21

  • Guest
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2007, 07:40:18 PM »
I agree.  But I've posted about things like this and got the same answer, "This game is called Aces HIGH  not GV warrior."  But i think we have enough planes

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #11 on: October 22, 2007, 09:38:37 PM »
definately higons boats so we would just let the troops out about 2 miles from town 2 planes come in and all troops are dead i like it it would be a nice adition add the trucks it is a good idea
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline machiel15

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2007, 12:11:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by rednex21
I agree.  But I've posted about things like this and got the same answer, "This game is called Aces HIGH  not GV warrior."  But i think we have enough planes


yeh but if they call it aces high 2 why they got panzer's and stuff in it?
in ah2 you can capture airfields not only with planes but with gvs thats good i like it, else everything will be in air of a airfield and you dont got any gv? no anti air vehicles?

Offline Scca

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2718
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2007, 07:19:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by rednex21
I agree.  But I've posted about things like this and got the same answer, "This game is called Aces HIGH  not GV warrior."  But i think we have enough planes
There's always one isn't there?

I like the ideas..  I love all aspects of the game so expanding on the ground war would be cool.  Maybe a higgins boat with an M3 in it would be cool.  Run the boat a shore and fire up the M3.  If it would require 2 players, one for each machine that would be cool too..
Flying as AkMeathd - CO Arabian Knights
Working on my bbs cred one post at a time

http://www.arabian-knights.org

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Vehicles and others..
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2007, 07:39:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Scca
There's always one isn't there?

I like the ideas..  I love all aspects of the game so expanding on the ground war would be cool.  Maybe a higgins boat with an M3 in it would be cool.  Run the boat a shore and fire up the M3.  If it would require 2 players, one for each machine that would be cool too..
Higgins boats couldn't carry a vehicle any larger than a Jeep.  You would need an LST for anything heavier.
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."