Author Topic: Flight Models  (Read 1608 times)

Offline Steve44

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Flight Models
« on: October 22, 2007, 08:36:29 PM »
How accurate are the flight models for the aircraft as compared to the planes they depict.  Looking a maybe getting on here but don’t want to waste my time flying aircraft that fly in unrealistic ways.  Don’t get me wrong, it is just a game but for me part of the fun is seeing how you would do if you were flying a certain plane, or as close to flying a certain plane.  I think you know what I mean.

Offline Murdr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5608
      • http://479th.jasminemaire.com
Flight Models
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2007, 08:51:50 PM »
Here is your answer in the owners own words:
Quote
Originally posted by hitech
We do our best to try accuratly simulate the PERFORMANCE of aircraft ,vehicles, and amunition. In general game play we do not try simulate WWII.

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18262
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Flight Models
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2007, 09:13:29 PM »
the download and flying off line is free as is the first two weeks, You have nothing to loose ! :aok

Offline mensa180

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4010
Flight Models
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2007, 09:20:29 PM »
It is the best, you will not be disappointed.  HTC is very particular in getting their flight models accurate.
inactive
80th FS "Headhunters"
Public Relations Officer

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Flight Models
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2007, 10:29:50 PM »
Grab your nose and jump in, the water's fine.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Dichotomy

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12391
Re: Flight Models
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2007, 10:33:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve44
How accurate are the flight models for the aircraft as compared to the planes they depict.  Looking a maybe getting on here but don’t want to waste my time flying aircraft that fly in unrealistic ways.  Don’t get me wrong, it is just a game but for me part of the fun is seeing how you would do if you were flying a certain plane, or as close to flying a certain plane.  I think you know what I mean.


It is my opinion that the staff of HTC does an extraordinary job of trying to simulate the characteristics of each individual vehicle.  The resident expert, in my opinion, is Widewing.  

It is also my opinion that this is by far the best community of any site, board, or group, I've been a part of.  

We may snipe at each other from time to time about stuff that doesn't matter much but let someone experience a personal tragedy and you will find brothers and sisters you never knew you had.

This is the best 15 bucks a month I've ever spent.

Good luck.
JG11 - Dicho37Only The Proud Only The Strong AH Players who've passed on :salute

Offline MajIssue

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 806
      • "False Prophets"
Flight Models
« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2007, 10:02:54 AM »
compare HTCs performance charts with the real McCoy and you'll find that they are very close... When they discover anomalies they usually get addresses in the next patch (kudos to the HTC staff on that). $15. a month is a bargain! See you in the MA and watch your 6!;)
X.O. False Prophets
Altitude is Life
If you keep ignoring "Wife Ack" it will go away.

Offline dedalos

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8052
Re: Flight Models
« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2007, 10:13:13 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve44
How accurate are the flight models for the aircraft as compared to the planes they depict.


How could anyone possibly know?
Quote from: 2bighorn on December 15, 2010 at 03:46:18 PM
Dedalos pretty much ruined DA.

Offline toonces3

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 799
Flight Models
« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2007, 11:36:15 AM »
Despite how accurately the aircraft are modeled (as Ded pointed out, who among us has 1000 hours in Spits or Ponys to know?), the planes appear to be modeled well with respect to each individual plane's strengths and weaknesses compared to another.

I've played another popular flight sim offline, a certain 1946 expansion, and I find the ability to turn some of those planes FOREVER quite forgiving compared to AH2.

But, like others have said, might as well take a few up offline and try for yourself.
"And I got my  :rocklying problem fix but my voice is going to inplode your head" -Kennyhayes

"My thread is forum gold, it should be melted down, turned into minature f/a-18 fighter jets and handed out to everyone who participated." -Thrila

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Re: Flight Models
« Reply #9 on: October 23, 2007, 12:14:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by dedalos
How could anyone possibly know?


Maybe someone who was actually flown a warbird, you know...someone like HiTech.



ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline toonces3

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 799
Flight Models
« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2007, 12:20:32 PM »
I don't know HiTech, but he didn't strike me as old enough to have accumulated a couple hundred hours flying all sorts of WW2 warbirds during the Big One.

However, having said that, even if he has a couple hundred hours in one or even two warbirds, that doesn't make him an expert on the flight models spanning the spectrum of planes in AH2.

I have 1500 hours in P-3's; that doesn't make me any more qualified to comment on the flight model of the F-16 in Falcon4 than you Ack-Ack.
"And I got my  :rocklying problem fix but my voice is going to inplode your head" -Kennyhayes

"My thread is forum gold, it should be melted down, turned into minature f/a-18 fighter jets and handed out to everyone who participated." -Thrila

Offline dedalos

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8052
Re: Re: Re: Flight Models
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2007, 12:41:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Maybe someone who was actually flown a warbird, you know...someone like HiTech.



ack-ack


Really?  He flew all of the planes we have?  Did he stall fight them 1K of the floor too?
Quote from: 2bighorn on December 15, 2010 at 03:46:18 PM
Dedalos pretty much ruined DA.

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Re: Flight Models
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2007, 01:15:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve44
How accurate are the flight models for the aircraft as compared to the planes they depict.  Looking a maybe getting on here but don’t want to waste my time flying aircraft that fly in unrealistic ways.  Don’t get me wrong, it is just a game but for me part of the fun is seeing how you would do if you were flying a certain plane, or as close to flying a certain plane.  I think you know what I mean.


No home based computer will ever be able to accurately replicate the experience of flying a vintage aircraft.  It is physically impossible.  The smells, the sounds, the vibrations, the concussions, the feeling of gravity are not possible with a home based PC.  Even full motion simulators can not completely replicate it.

That said, the flight model here is fairly close in performance levels.  Environmental effects like wake turbulence, thermals, and weather turbulence are not here.  Then again, I doubt most home machines could process that level of data.  

All in all though, it is a fun experience.  It is defintely better than any other online flight game I have ever played.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Flight Models
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2007, 01:44:49 PM »
Whatever HT did to get the game where it is the hit percentages of the better shooters seems to be in line with the scoring systems used in gunnery practice of 1940-ish. I have no idea of combat situations though but its my opinion that  some of the moves you see in this game are largely due to the fact that the person making those moves isnt in a real plane feeling the real gravity and other effects of flight. Man if we could only perfect that warp effect in real life! :D
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1226
Re: Flight Models
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2007, 02:19:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Steve44
How accurate are the flight models for the aircraft as compared to the planes they depict.  Looking a maybe getting on here but don’t want to waste my time flying aircraft that fly in unrealistic ways.  Don’t get me wrong, it is just a game but for me part of the fun is seeing how you would do if you were flying a certain plane, or as close to flying a certain plane.  I think you know what I mean.


There are two questions in that post, one is how close the aircraft in aces high compare to the planes they depict, and the other is about aircraft that fly in unrealistic ways. The first is a function of the data used to load the flight model, the second is a function of the flight model itself. I'll deal with both.

Regarding the flight model itself, I've been involved with flight simulations from the time they first appeared in computer games around about 1983, and with the first multi-player online flight Sim, Air Warrior, that appeared in 1987. Since those days I've flown the vast majority of the combat flight simulations released, with very few exceptions. I also know how to write a flight model, apart from having the source code to three commercial flight simulations I have my own flight model running in a test program used to analyse aircraft performance. I've also worked with flight simulation developers on flight modelling so I can say with some confidence that the flight model in Aces High is second to none!

With regard to the data used to load the flight model, and the comparison to real world aircraft, the issue isn't quite as clear.

The reason is that what many would consider to be reliable and accurate sources of data for an aircraft, sources such as the manufacturer, various scientific establishments and test agencies, and of course the air forces that used the aircraft operationally, often conflict in the precise values for aircraft performance.

The simple fact is, that unless they all tested the very same aircraft, at exactly the same place and at exactly the same time, you would expect to see differences in their results. There are so many factors that contribute to those variations, it is more surprising that the numerical values for such data agrees as closely as it often does. For that reason experienced and competitive flight Sim’ pilots won’t assume that the aircraft being modeled will compare exactly to their expectations. By using statistical methods, the errors can be kept to single figures, and depending on the quantity and sources of data they can sometimes be impressively small single figures. You will often see threads here where players who have done excellent research, will argue over just a few mph, that itself is testimony to the degree of fidelity here.

More importantly, most of the players expect the combination of physics modelling and data to be sophisticated and accurate enough that real world tactics can be successfully employed against their opponents and that is certainly true in Aces High, and in my experience, more so than in any other online simulation.

Hope that helps.

Badboy
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired