Author Topic: furballing vs. sustained offensive  (Read 1492 times)

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2007, 07:31:29 AM »
Long & short of it, its the other guys dime, he flys the way he choses.

Do what you can with what you have, and make the best of it.

Offline ColSuave

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 148
Re: furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2007, 09:24:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Apers
sticks in my craw something awful.

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl
Quote
the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2007, 09:44:21 AM »
Apers you were doing fine until you put out, "I feel like the only one". Well your not the only one that feels that way. But in this thread youve ran into a few that have no problems telling others how to play but dont dare suggest "they" should play a different way.

                         Truth is a lot of guys enjoy furballing. I personally enjoy strategy and teamwork, "as well as blowing things up". To each their own, its all good baby. I know with the Rooks you often get loose coalitions working together to take bases and choke off the Bish and Knits with bombers and Jabos. At the same time others are furballing and tying up gobs of enemy fighters. When you have the right mix, and Dredger and Lynx are on-line, bases fall. And fighters fall in the furball.

                    Lately Ive been taking out ords at the frontline. Does it help the team?? Yeah probably. But it also means Im likely to get a little action too.

                  Storch Im sure the 5'th SOAR has nothing but good to say about you too.:lol  This is about the 10'th post in a row Ive seen you badmouthing somebody. I'll bet you got picked on a lot as a kid. Or, you are actually "a kid".
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline Adonai

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1025
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2007, 10:15:08 AM »
Long time ago was a discussion on having one arena for furballers and second one for winning wars, I agree the arenas should stay way they are.
Ones who want to take bases need to join a squad and do squad opperations and leave those who pay 15 bucks just to furball to do just that. I happen to be a rounded experienced player, prefer furballing, base taking, and special events, so I really don't care on winning a war simply because the perks wont even match one sortie i make shooting down aircraft, if were making a push ill gladly help out in porking and such. Just funny to hear on country channel that there is ALWAYS something someone has to cry about. ENY, HO Ram, w3r Winners, check 6 calls etc.

Pay your 15 bucks and play how you want, don't care bout anyone else.

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2007, 10:24:48 AM »
I think he has a valid point.  I often wondered why, rather than circling their own bases defensively people didn't fly over and attack the enemy base next door.  So, in my quest for turning the war around I'd be the one to do so.

I'd start a base back, fly over the incoming cons to get to their base then attack them while they were low and slow.  It just seemed like good common tactical sense (and still does).

On the other hand, I've spent a little time circling waiting for the incoming cons and now I realize why people do it.  It's easy.

You get a big support group (hoard) against a straggling conga line of incoming single cons and even if they have E to begin with they don't keep it for long.  You have a nearby base to quickly land your kills when the action settles or to get to if you take damage.  You can up, get kills, land and re-up at least a couple of times while each enemy spends their time in transit.  You don't have to put up with enemy ack or worry about fuel or an exit strategy.

I think everyone should limit their game to circling their own bases from now on (Storch will like this because that's what Seagulls do around garbage scows looking for an easy meal).  

And for those who might disagree, play my way or die s***a's!  :p
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Simaril

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2007, 11:31:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
Without "furballers", the "win t3h wor" fanboi's would not be able to take their precious bases.  

Without "toolshedders", the "furballers", wouldn't have the furballs.

In April I will have played this game for 6 years.   I no longer care if Rooks "win" and get free perks.    I earn em by flying a cartoon aircraft in a game.    I also don't gripe about the ENY because I fly Mid-war/early-war rides in the Late war's.


Word.
Maturity is knowing that I've been an idiot in the past.
Wisdom is realizing I will be an idiot in the future.
Common sense is trying to not be an idiot right now

"Social Fads are for sheeple." - Meatwad

Offline xbrit

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1669
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2007, 12:51:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Apers
don't make silly assumptions about people's character.


LOL you post like an armchair general and then whine when others don't agree with you.
Your funny you make my dog look smart.

Offline Apers

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 81
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #22 on: October 29, 2007, 02:29:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by xbrit
LOL you post like an armchair general and then whine when others don't agree with you.
Your funny you make my dog look smart.



I'm not whining, I'm stating that you're attacking my character. and you continue to do so.

I'm simply stating an observation, and trying to find others of like mind to fly with. You're simply trolling.






Once again, I love furballs. I just wish they weren't directly over friendly bases half the time. Sometimes I'd like them to be over the enemy base, or the water. I like to vary my entertainment.


I'll give the 5th SOAR a look-see.

Offline xbrit

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1669
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #23 on: October 29, 2007, 02:48:48 PM »
Quote


I'm simply stating an observation, and trying to find others of like mind to fly with. You're simply trolling.
 [/B]

Just like I first said you want people to play like you.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #24 on: October 29, 2007, 04:09:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Apers



I'll give the 5th SOAR a look-see.

*snicker*
See Rule #4

Offline FBplmmr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #25 on: October 29, 2007, 04:19:07 PM »
Is there a time limit whereupon a base defense/base attack
or establishing a cap/breaking a cap becomes A FURBALL! :O



Maybe  we can establish a strict time limit and if it is exceeded we can all auger  count to 30 and up somewhere else..

no sense fostering rumors of AIR COMBAT!


A good base take would be to prevail over a strong defense.... so if you cant get it done while we tie up the fighters don't blame us:D  



Turns out I can drop bombs on empty buildings offline.

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #26 on: October 29, 2007, 04:23:03 PM »
It's all about the fight, if you're playing this game to not have a fight, then you're playing for all the wrong reasons!!!!:aok

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #27 on: October 29, 2007, 04:24:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by storch
you can join the 5th SOAR they are always winning the war.  in fact the rth SOAR are probably the very pinnacle of AH base taking tacticians, so long as the base are undefended of course.


The 708th Rolling Flatulence also fall into that category.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline betty

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2512
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #28 on: October 29, 2007, 04:31:50 PM »
AKAK! where u been??? i havent seen u in the MA in long time.

hope all is well <>
~~~The Killuminati~~~                                                     

!!!!!POTIUS MORI QUAM FOEDARI!!!!

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
furballing vs. sustained offensive
« Reply #29 on: October 29, 2007, 04:54:35 PM »
I log on to do what I want to. Every now and then I will "try" to help with a base capture (cant believe I admitted that) but generally I just look for a fight here and there.

The Squad I'm in can take bases and knows how to. And , I might add generally does a good job when we set out to do that.

However , If "winning" the "war" was basically the only way to get perks , I'd have zippo.

I make more perkies in an hour of flying usually than if the Knights win(which is hardaly ever:lol )

I've been in the Toolsheddar bunch....After leaving it and just learning to die more to bullets than ACK.....I have found alot more fun.
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles