Originally posted by texasmom
Did I really say that already? I really did think that was my very first weenie remark on these boards ~ ever ~ about anyone... I was saving it up special.
What does it have to do with satisfying presidential functions? I'd rather have a bold and manly character with Paul's political stances, but there isn't one. It would be just icing on the cake, though. Brass tacks are what matters txmom, you know this.
What brass tacks are guys like Giuliani proposing? What brass tacks are any of the other candidates proposing, that all things considered are a better alternative, in terms of presidential apropriateness and efficiency, than Paul's?
It doesn't matter if he's an egghead. This isn't a beauty pageant, nor a money raising contest. It's about what some guy will decide happens to you and everyone else, as far as the government can help it, for the next few half-decade.
Are you just picking a candidate on how photogenic he will be when you flip on the tv as you have breakfast, and then totaly ignore what the govt does the rest of the time?