Author Topic: USAAF Fighter Performace Data  (Read 1214 times)

Offline leitwolf

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 656
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #15 on: December 12, 2007, 06:31:30 PM »
Thanks widewing, this stuff is always interesting.

Without the proper context some parts are hard to grasp:
How can the P-47 outturn the 190, yet the 190 "tends to black out the pilot". :huh
veni, vidi, vulchi.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #16 on: December 12, 2007, 06:33:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by leitwolf
Thanks widewing, this stuff is always interesting.

Without the proper context some parts are hard to grasp:
How can the P-47 outturn the 190, yet the 190 "tends to black out the pilot". :huh


Beats me... :) However, download the document and read the part about G suits.. The 9th AF was fully equipped with them right around D-Day.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #17 on: December 12, 2007, 06:38:10 PM »
For Neil Sterling and Mike Williams. Likewise something of interest for Luftwaffe buffs too.



My regards,

Widewing
« Last Edit: December 12, 2007, 07:03:00 PM by Widewing »
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline TUXC

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #18 on: December 12, 2007, 06:52:34 PM »
Good stuff! Thank you for sharing.
Tuxc123

JG11

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #19 on: December 12, 2007, 07:24:58 PM »
Widewing, it's a long shot, but have you seen any mention of the Ta152 anywhere?
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #20 on: December 12, 2007, 07:43:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by moot
Widewing, it's a long shot, but have you seen any mention of the Ta152 anywhere?


I didn't see anything in this document. However, this document was written in mid 1944, long before the Ta 152 was known to the Allies. There are several references to the Fw 290, which is in reality, the Fw 190C. This fighter was a precursor to the Ta 152.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #21 on: December 12, 2007, 08:17:04 PM »
Yes, I meant anywhere in wartime documents like these, written by the allies.  Anything that compared the Ta 152 with its allied competitors.

Thanks :)
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline SgtPappy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1174
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #22 on: December 12, 2007, 10:09:16 PM »
That's a lot of good info! :aok  thanks!
I am a Spitdweeb

"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of earth... Put out my hand and touched the face of God." -J.G. Magee Jr.

Offline Rollins

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
      • 4thFG
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #23 on: December 12, 2007, 11:57:33 PM »
Very cool stuff WW, thanks!  I must say I wish it wasn't a misprint on the P-38s armament, first page in the thread- 1 20mm and 4 50mm- uber :aok
http://www.flamewarriors.net    Here kitty kitty...

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #24 on: December 13, 2007, 06:16:25 AM »
I wish we'd get a DB 603 powered Dora. It would rule.


Offline TUXC

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #25 on: December 13, 2007, 08:23:42 AM »
^^^Or even the plane you just posted a picture of, Viking: Fw 190D-13. Has an engine with a much higher rated altitude than the D-9 (30000+ft) and has 3x20mm cannon.


Widewing, in addition to being the Fw 190C, the Fw 290 possibly could have also been based off information on the Ta152A and B which would have been in development at that time. Both were to be powered by various versions of the Jumo 213, but the DB603 had also been designated as an alternative powerplant.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2007, 08:28:56 AM by TUXC »
Tuxc123

JG11

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
USAAF Fighter Performace Data
« Reply #26 on: December 16, 2007, 11:12:39 AM »
KOOL keep it coming thnx!:aok
Flying since tour 71.