A other kind of War win system.....

[FiLtH]

Give him a break

[Tilt]

I think HT should constantly change the rules just to confuse us.............

[68ROX]

Geeeeeeez folks....

How about if this game were on a German server, and YOU were required to post ONLY in GERMAN?

How is YOUR Hochdeutsch?

Or.....what if this game were on a Lithuanian server and you were required to post only in Lithuanian?  Hey, I only remember DIRTY Lithuanian words.




It's fairly easy to see where he's getting at:

If instead of three uncapturable bases, those three bases HAD to be taken to win the war...the game strategy & tactics would change (instead of, in many cases...going a full week or tour in a stalemate...or one country getting boned by the other two, but the "win" requirements  weren't met, and one country gets screwed and still it's a stalemate between the other two.

He's simply presenting an IDEA.




(I swear some of you would find it within reason to roast Mother Theresa on a spit if her spelling, syntax, and verb tense usage had a mistake in it.)



68ROX

[hubsonfire]

It's apparently not that easy, Rox. I think he's talking about only 3 fields being capturable, not just 3 more fields to be captured, which your interpretation seems to indicate. A reverse of the current setup, to put it simply.

Also, the only guy poking fun at Chris's English is Count Chocula, which is somewhat ironic.

Warmest regards from a native English speaker who only makes fun of illiterate Americans and Brits,

[Bronk]

Originally posted by hubsonfire


Also, the only guy poking fun at Chris's English is Count Chocula, which is somewhat ironic.

 

Count Chocula he says.

[chris3]

Originally posted by hubsonfire
It's apparently not that easy, Rox. I think he's talking about only 3 fields being capturable, not just 3 more fields to be captured, which your interpretation seems to indicate. A reverse of the current setup, to put it simply.

Also, the only guy poking fun at Chris's English is Count Chocula, which is somewhat ironic.

Warmest regards from a native English speaker who only makes fun of illiterate Americans and Brits,

no no, i meant all bases are capturable but only these 3 are importent for the reset. so the main statecic is: geting deapper and deaper into enemy teritory until the 3 main bases are attack able. i think it would be rise the fight on the way to the enemy centre. exspesiali on some map i think the ground war starts to bekomme more fun....

cu chris3

[68ROX]

Originally posted by hubsonfire

Also, the only guy poking fun at Chris's English is Count Chocula, which is somewhat ironic.
 

I've never been bish, but that's what I have heard.







68ROX

[Solar10]

Originally posted by chris3
no no, i meant all bases are capturable but only these 3 are importent for the reset. so the main statecic is: geting deapper and deaper into enemy teritory until the 3 main bases are attack able. i think it would be rise the fight on the way to the enemy centre. exspesiali on some map i think the ground war starts to bekomme more fun....

cu chris3

Again, I agree.

Can you imagine the fight that would develop if one of these bases were to be captured.  The other side that just lost it would fight like mad to get it back.  It certainly would focus fighting.

There would be no point in a long range NOE to take one as there would be no way to keep it if it was surrounded by other friendly fields.

[hubsonfire]

Originally posted by chris3
no no, i meant all bases are capturable but only these 3 are importent for the reset. so the main statecic is: geting deapper and deaper into enemy teritory until the 3 main bases are attack able. i think it would be rise the fight on the way to the enemy centre. exspesiali on some map i think the ground war starts to bekomme more fun....

cu chris3

I stand corrected.

[ghi]

Chris
my apologize, mein entschuldigen Sie sich, i didn't mean to be rude, anyway i speak way worst than you spell, with my  Lou Doobs broken border english ,
  Aufviedersehen! viva la francaise!

[Meatwad]

I liked it better long ago when all bases were capturable

[Lusche]

Originally posted by Meatwad
I liked it better long ago when all bases were capturable

And what exactly would be better when all bases are capturable?

[chris3]

Originally posted by ghi
Chris
my apologize, mein entschuldigen Sie sich, i didn't mean to be rude, anyway i speak way worst than you spell, with my  Lou Doobs broken border english ,
  Aufviedersehen! viva la francaise!

Moin

no problem ghi, didnt were beleidigt :-).

but i hope it bekommes a litel bit clear what i want to say.

sure the fight bekomms realy hard if one of these base is captured and that is the point.
i remember the days as  the country was down to 3 bases and the fight was realy hard in the smal combat zone over the enemy teritory, it was always fun to enter these small compatzone.

and now i guse these setup wuld be a better compromis between old styl war win system and the new styl war win system. the best of these two systems...

The main point is, every country did have a main target to work for so it could rise the teamwork in game a bit.

dam i dont like my english.....

hope again, you understand me right lol

cu chris3

[SD67]

What you propose is interesting indeed.
It would promote aggressive attack and defence of the three key bases for those chasing and preventing a quick reset, as well as supporting a more conventional style of base capture for those hoping to maintain  control of the captured bases.
For it to be more effective in the terms of gameplay, the three key bases should be held continuously for a set period of time.  This would help to prevent the lightning capture and reset by the more experienced strat squads.

[Spazzter]

Originally posted by jhookt
where the heck are the spelling police to decipher this thread?

I was thinking the same thing and then noticed he is from Germany so I gave him a free pass.  However, there is no excuse for Sunfan to be spelling Isn't as isint.  


Spazz