A other kind of War win system.....

[chris3]

moin

In the arenas we have 3 bases un capturable. what did you think if the war win configuration chanche and only these 3 bases would be importend to have to win the war? the game dynamick would change i gues. only a thought...
hoppe i could explain correct what i mean....

what did you mean?

cu chris3

[ghi]

Originally posted by chris3
moin

hoppe i could explain correct what i mean....

what did you mean?

cu chris3

i verstehen nothing , you bist kaput since mucho bier octoberfest`:(

[sunfan1121]

isint that game called Warbirds

[BlauK]

I believe Chris meant to ask people's opinions on his idea where the three currently uncapturable bases would be capturable and only they would matter in winning a war.
In other words, the war would end if one country captured all those  three important bases from another country.

[Speed55]

Actually i think it's a cool idea.

[sunfan1121]

would never work because of good teamwork squads like rollingthunder. 3 well thought out and planed strikes would be a easy map reset. IMO

[jhookt]

Originally posted by sunfan1121
would never work because of good teamwork squads like rollingthunder. 3 well thought out and planed strikes would be a easy map reset. IMO

where the heck are the spelling police to decipher this thread?

[Solar10]

This would be a great idea.  It would certainly generate good fights and maybe some mass buff missions.

[sunfan1121]

Originally posted by jhookt
where the heck are the spelling police to decipher this thread?

I waz undr the impresion that this wasent englishh clas

[Stang]

Originally posted by sunfan1121
I waz undr the impresion that this wasent englishh clas

Sloppiness and laziness breeds both.

[Krusty]

This would only encourage avoiding the fight. Hell we've got maps now like on baltic (or whatever it's aclled) where you'll get 2-hour off-map NOE raids by a lanc and a goon and a single fighter to deack, kill VH, and capture the V-base nearest the enemy HQ while the front lines are 6 sectors away, and with plenty of fighting at the front lines.

It has happened numerous times before.


A rule like this would encourage people to avoid the fight and sneak/steal the base without any opposition, while the entire country is 6-8 sectors away actually defending the fields under attack.


Bad idea.

[KayBayRay]

IMHO this could result in map resets every hour or less. Even though there are maps I wish this would happen to every time I see them I dont think it would be good for the community.

I believe it would cause too significant of a change to the game and IMHO render it just another fluff flight sim that went south.

Later,
KayBay

[Hap]

Originally posted by ghi
i verstehen nothing , you bist kaput since mucho bier octoberfest`:(

Maproom Destroyed

[Ack-Ack]

Originally posted by sunfan1121
would never work because of good teamwork squads like rollingthunder. IMO

LOL!  Just up the base the Rolling Flatulence are attacking and they scatter like cockroaches caught under a light.  


ack-ack

[MajIssue]

Originally posted by Krusty
This would only encourage avoiding the fight. Hell we've got maps now like on baltic (or whatever it's aclled) where you'll get 2-hour off-map NOE raids by a lanc and a goon and a single fighter to deack, kill VH, and capture the V-base nearest the enemy HQ while the front lines are 6 sectors away, and with plenty of fighting at the front lines.

It has happened numerous times before.


A rule like this would encourage people to avoid the fight and sneak/steal the base without any opposition, while the entire country is 6-8 sectors away actually defending the fields under attack.


Bad idea.

Maybe a little off topic, but I've done solo Vbase captures by upping a fighter with cannons, Killing the 2 auto-acks and the soft gun and bringing in troops in an M-3 or Dakota when the opposition is focused eleswhere, just to get them to react and take pressure off "the front".

On topic:  I agree that this idea would make for a map that lasts for an hour or less before a reset.