Author Topic: the media.. shootings..  (Read 1529 times)

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
the media.. shootings..
« Reply #60 on: December 14, 2007, 09:17:59 AM »
So,  I'm posting in EVERY SINGLE gun thread...but now you bet it is 50% of them.

I specifically haven't posted in very many gun threads over the past year or so.

You are wrong.  Plain and simple.  I have posted in one or two this week.  Prior to that I seriously challenge you to find anywhere CLOSE to the 50%of gun threads you now claim I post in.

In 2007 I am willing to bet it is less than 5%.

Think about it.  You and I have not gone toe to toe in any gun threads in a very long time.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline Charon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
the media.. shootings..
« Reply #61 on: December 14, 2007, 09:22:47 AM »
Quote
Wow man, that sounds familiar.


That's interesting because I recall numerous detailed multi-page debates on this board on the subject that are, for the most part, polite. I have take part in many of them. Don't recall many that have been locked.

Now, do the foreign gun control proponents find themselves outnumbered. Sure. While there are a few US posters that are pro gun control there really is no comparable "grass roots" movement to speak of in the US. You have some big city mayors who promote guns as the major source of inner city crime as a distraction to problems they (and we as a society) lack the will to address directly. You see a handful of true believers largely funded by the Joyce Foundation and Soros. You see a media that generally believes in a European model for society, guns included. And you have seen (though that is changing) a Democratic party that made gun control a platform plank in the past no doubt related to the big city/Democrat power base.

But, for the vast majority of the people living in the US there is no "Gun problem." There is no gun problem even for those living in the roughest neighborhoods, unless they are actively involved in a criminal lifestyle. Admittedly, there is a much broader violence problem in those neighborhoods than you would find anywhere else in the US -- where violence in general is a part of daily life-- but even there most of that does not involve a trigger being pulled.  As I have pointed out the risk from alcohol, or diet and I believe even unprotected sex, etc. are greater -- far greater in many cases.

In fact, for people actually living here the view of the "wild west" US that a lot of foreigners have from the media and movies and Rap music etc. is actually a bit funny and out of tune with reality. [edit: It somewhat funny, because I see plenty of rural Americans on other boards talking about a trip into the big city,  and no CCW etc. and they are nervous and it's pretty obvious they are out of touch with reality as well thanks to the media and "If it bleeds it leads." As long as they aren't coming to the city to sell a few kilos of crack they'll probably be OK :)]

So, frankly, the only people in the US who really care about the issue tend to be gun owners and politicians and the Democrats are starting to realize it's a loser because even the big city voters don't put that as a top tier concern approaching the economy or the war in Iraq, etc. So if they support gun control they gain little and lose the rural Democrats in return. Go over to the Daily Koz or the Democratic Underground sometime and watch the gun debate over there. There are more gun control proponents than you find hear, but it is definitely a two-sided debate there as well.

Charon
« Last Edit: December 14, 2007, 09:31:16 AM by Charon »

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
the media.. shootings..
« Reply #62 on: December 14, 2007, 03:44:47 PM »
curval.. you did make me think about it...  It certainly does seem that you have been in less gun threads this year than in the past..  no way am I gonna do the research that it would take to prove it one way or the other..   I will concede that it is something like a number between what you think and what I think.

still... why bother at all?   If you have no strong feelings on it.   I think I feel about the way charon feels about it..

I don't see any real anti gun grass roots swell here.. it is all media and democrat politicians.. the rank and file couldn't care less.. do you see people clamoring for some new gun ban after a shooting?  nope.. in fact.. most Americans that don't have guns start thinking it is a good time to buy one.

I know all too many who say that they don't own a gun now but... any hint of a ban and they will rush out and get one.  

The democrat politicians are manufacturing a concern about gun control that just doesn't exist.. and they are doing it because the people who pay em tell em to..   they know it is a loser but they are taking the gun control money.

lazs

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
the media.. shootings..
« Reply #63 on: December 14, 2007, 03:52:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
still... why bother at all?   If you have no strong feelings on it.  


I guess I'm just trying to keep you "honest".  ;)

In this one I see you complaining about media manipulation of an event.  Then you throw out stats that you claim everyone should know and yet even Charon admits the data is not conclusive on the subject.

Nobody else is going to call you on it.  Beet1e and most of the other "Euro liberals" are gone so I am all that is left.

It's kinda like my sacred duty.

LOL.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
the media.. shootings..
« Reply #64 on: December 15, 2007, 10:02:03 AM »
The stats are correct.. not the way you said it.. it was not 3/4 as you said but the 1/4 that I said.   If you can find any source that disproves that then I will be glad to look at it.

You "feeling" it is not correct is not too good a "proof"   You not liking Lott is not good enough...  you saying that Lott is wrong .05% of the time is not good enough.. it simply means that there is a 99.5% chance that he is correct on this fact too.. that is about as good as it gets..

contrast that with.. oh.. "the arming of america" that ended up being 95% BS and was universally praised by the media... it is now an embarassing joke on the liberals of course but....

I told you where to find the fact.. You have searched for sites that try to disprove anything Lotts says yet.. you don't show that he is wrong.

It seems fair to say that Lott's figure... based on weight of numbers of data that he puts out that is extremely accurate.. that there is about a 99% chance this one is entirely accurate.  

How does that stack up against your predjudice and wishful thinking?

lazs

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
the media.. shootings..
« Reply #65 on: December 15, 2007, 01:12:58 PM »
I've spent about 30 seconds doing a yahoo search to find anything I have found on Lott.  Don't flatter yourself, you (or this issue is only worth about that much of my time.

"You "feeling" it is not correct is not too good a "proof" You not liking Lott is not good enough... you saying that Lott is wrong .05% of the time is not good enough.. it simply means that there is a 99.5% chance that he is correct on this fact too.. that is about as good as it gets.."

I am not saying Lott is wrong .05% of the time...that is you.  You you you.

I'm still trying to figure out where the 0.05% came from, but now suddenly Lott is right 99.5% as a result.

Your manipulations are quite staggering.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline vorticon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7935
the media.. shootings..
« Reply #66 on: December 15, 2007, 01:28:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Curval

I'm still trying to figure out where the 0.05% came from, but now suddenly Lott is right 99.5% as a result.
.



thin air, based on what they feel...same place everyone else gets that kind of number.

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
the media.. shootings..
« Reply #67 on: December 16, 2007, 10:13:27 AM »
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis