Author Topic: A new bombers (Read 714 times)

DEAR98 · « **on:** December 14, 2007, 07:05:27 PM »

the list of them is so small its funney so mabye whould chould get the
Hell Diver and B-32 or eney outher bombers whould be nice mabye a jet
have fun

Redlegs · « **Reply #1 on:** December 14, 2007, 07:09:47 PM »

Who wants to go first?

AirFlyer · « **Reply #2 on:** December 14, 2007, 07:26:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Redlegs
Who wants to go first?

Too easy...

Motherland · « **Reply #3 on:** December 14, 2007, 07:43:27 PM »

NO MORE AMERICAN BOMBERS.

He-111 FTW.

BTW We have a jet bomber, the Ar234.

hubsonfire · « **Reply #4 on:** December 14, 2007, 08:05:03 PM »

Aw c'mon guys, he's 9. Just let it go. There are plenty of other ideas to mock from people who have no excuse.

DEAR98 · « **Reply #5 on:** December 14, 2007, 08:09:54 PM »

Bosco123 · « **Reply #6 on:** December 14, 2007, 09:07:15 PM »

How about this?:

It acually flew in WW2 but only for V1's. All of the History people would have wanted to see what the 262 and this, the Gloster Meteor would do if they met eachother.

Gowan · « **Reply #7 on:** December 14, 2007, 09:10:34 PM »

OI!

i already suggested the b32 this tour none the less, USE THE SEARCH BUTTON!!! RAWR!!!!!

SgtPappy · « **Reply #8 on:** December 14, 2007, 10:06:39 PM »

Bosco123... tell me where you got that avatar/emoticon.

I
need
that.

Rich46yo · « **Reply #9 on:** December 14, 2007, 11:28:42 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Motherland
NO MORE AMERICAN BOMBERS
He-111 FTW.
BTW We have a jet bomber, the Ar234.

I would have interest in it if we could arm it with glide bombs. Other then that? The JU-88 looks and flys like a Ferrari compared to the He-111 and since the JU-88 is already a hangar queen what would the slower and less capable He-111 be?

OK maybe the JU-88 isnt a HQ, or, doesnt deserve to be. Its a very nice bomber to fly but the fact is you dont see it in the air to often and I'd bet you'd never see the He-111.

What we really need is the TU-2.

Motherland · « **Reply #10 on:** December 14, 2007, 11:45:04 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Rich46yo
I would have interest in it if we could arm it with glide bombs. Other then that? The JU-88 looks and flys like a Ferrari compared to the He-111 and since the JU-88 is already a hangar queen what would the slower and less capable He-111 be?.

So? ANY new bomber we get, beside maybe a B29(doubt its gonna happen any time soon) and the Tu2, will be a 'hangar queen' compared to the Lancaster or B24. So that point is irrelevent.
The He-111 in any case has a better defensive armament than the Ju-88, with 7 .30's that were sometimes replaced with MG131's and MGFF's. Plus, it was a major German bomber and played a large role in the war.

GoldenP51 · « **Reply #11 on:** December 15, 2007, 04:06:34 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Motherland
So? ANY new bomber we get, beside maybe a B29(doubt its gonna happen any time soon) and the Tu2, will be a 'hangar queen' compared to the Lancaster or B24. So that point is irrelevent.
The He-111 in any case has a better defensive armament than the Ju-88, with 7 .30's that were sometimes replaced with MG131's and MGFF's. Plus, it was a major German bomber and played a large role in the war.

what?? did someone say we are getting the B29?

Bosco123 · « **Reply #12 on:** December 15, 2007, 08:55:57 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SgtPappy
Bosco123... tell me where you got that avatar/emoticon.

I
need
that.

Sgt Papy Check ur PMs

Redlegs · « **Reply #13 on:** December 15, 2007, 09:30:38 AM »

Bosco did you get that from a post of mine in the AHXARL forum?

Bosco123 · « **Reply #14 on:** December 15, 2007, 11:00:41 AM »

Yea I did I thought that that was a bit funny as well.