Author Topic: WW, Bomb Truck--P-47 vs. F4U-4/5?  (Read 1337 times)

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Re: Re: Re: WW, Bomb Truck--P-47 vs. F4U-4/5?
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2008, 10:34:30 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Guppy35
Interesting note in the 82nd FG history and a photo as well regarding those droop snoot missions.  They were set up with bomb pylons for 6 500 pounders, 3 on each side of the cockpit pod all inside of the engines.



It makes sense.  The38's hard points are attached directly to the bottom spar cap and the spar in that area is reinforced to spread out the weight.  Why not attach more pylons.  We already know they could carry 2000 lbs on the single pylon, why not spread more pylons and carry more bombs.

As for the 2000 lbrs, Guppy, have you seen enough proof to know whether there was indeed a shortage that precluded the P-38 from carrying these weapons more?
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Re: Re: Re: WW, Bomb Truck--P-47 vs. F4U-4/5?
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2008, 12:18:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bodhi
It makes sense.  The38's hard points are attached directly to the bottom spar cap and the spar in that area is reinforced to spread out the weight.  Why not attach more pylons.  We already know they could carry 2000 lbs on the single pylon, why not spread more pylons and carry more bombs.

As for the 2000 lbrs, Guppy, have you seen enough proof to know whether there was indeed a shortage that precluded the P-38 from carrying these weapons more?


Interesting to note, that in terms of photo evidence, I can't find any that show 2000 pounders on a 38.  Most times it's 500 pounders.  On occasion its 1000 pounders.  I don't recall ever seeing mention of anything larger then 1000 pounders in a Group history and I have all of the 38 groups that have published histories.

As for the 3 pylon set up, the only group I've seen photos to support their use was the 82nd in the MTO.

Two below.   First is their droopsnoot with 6 500 pounders.


Second showing the 6 pylon set up with 4 500 pounders and 2 DTs.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
WW, Bomb Truck--P-47 vs. F4U-4/5?
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2008, 02:37:18 PM »
that's awesome, thanks Guppy.

I wish we could fine some photos showing the 2000 lb eggs on them.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
WW, Bomb Truck--P-47 vs. F4U-4/5?
« Reply #18 on: January 14, 2008, 02:36:12 PM »
Saxman,

I dream of returning to AH however my dreams are on hold for the moment. I went and accepted a promotion that has pretty much ruined my life as I knew it for the last 1 1/2. Anyway one day I hope to poke my head back in. I have yet to fly the F4U-1A in earnest and I really want to take it up for a spin.

Widewing,

Here is the document I was reffering too. Apparently those pesky Marines don't always do what they are supposed to do. Over 5,000lbs of external ordinance is getting into 4 engine bomber territory. I don't suppose they were going very far.


Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
WW, Bomb Truck--P-47 vs. F4U-4/5?
« Reply #19 on: January 18, 2008, 01:20:11 PM »


This is from Korea but a heavy loadout regardless.