Author Topic: Guess we're gettin' a 39Q! (Read 12373 times)

68ROX · « **Reply #15 on:** January 25, 2008, 11:51:46 AM »

I'm with red...

I do not see on the homepage to AH where you are seeing that.

68ROX

Yeager · « **Reply #16 on:** January 25, 2008, 11:53:02 AM »

I am very happy

It is good to see the folks at HTC cranking out this beautiful air machine.

Are there any other details about the next release?

1Boner · « **Reply #17 on:** January 25, 2008, 11:54:36 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by 5PointOh
So were getting the P-39. Hmmm does that mean this is next?

Yes I'm greedy!

Nope!!

You'll see alot of this next!

Looks like it can double as a submarine!!

Lusche · « **Reply #18 on:** January 25, 2008, 11:59:34 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by 68ROX
I'm with red...

I do not see on the homepage to AH where you are seeing that.

68ROX

You might have to reaload/refresh the page first. I guess you are still looking at cached version.

crockett · « **Reply #19 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:01:01 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by 1Boner
Nope!!

You'll see alot of this next!

Looks like it can double as a submarine!!

well I've said for a while we need some Uboats!!!

SFCHONDO · « **Reply #20 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:02:16 PM »

Are they going to model the CG problems which caused it to flat spin rather easly. And was even more pronounce after it fired it's ammo, creating an even worse CG problem. Or am I thinking of a different plane.

Redlegs · « **Reply #21 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:03:47 PM »

I see it now looks great. WTG Superfly

hubsonfire · « **Reply #22 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:12:30 PM »

You can search "P39Q" and find quite a few of the older discussions on the plane, and probably the Wiki and various other links to information.

Helm · « **Reply #23 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:15:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by oboe

Now, expectations of flight model? Will she handle like a cross between our P-40B and P-40E? Faster than either, but not as tight turning? Tough, durable damage model?

It will handle like an AMC Pacer ........

Helm ...out

RTHolmes · « **Reply #24 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:21:55 PM »

since my deflection shots usually hit behind the canopy im rather looking forward to this

it does look cool though

Scca · « **Reply #25 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:28:15 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SFCHONDO
Are they going to model the CG problems which caused it to flat spin rather easly. And was even more pronounce after it fired it's ammo, creating an even worse CG problem. Or am I thinking of a different plane.

From what I read it was only a problem when zero ammo was carried. The weight of the empty shells was enough to resolve the issue..

Latrobe · « **Reply #26 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:30:54 PM »

WOO WOOOO!!! just saw! gimme gimme gimme gimme!!

LLv34_Camouflage · « **Reply #27 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:32:49 PM »

Looks like its the P39 which is on display in the Finnish Air Force Museum in Jyväskylä, Finland:

A few more pictures here: http://www.pienoismallit.net/galleria/referenssi_1422/

Here's the link to the museum website: http://www.k-silmailumuseo.fi/?action=etusivu

Excellent, thanks HTC! Brewster next?

Camo

JB73 · « **Reply #28 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:33:20 PM »

COOL....

Thats a gunsight I made in the screenshot

RTHolmes · « **Reply #29 on:** January 25, 2008, 12:35:51 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Scca
The weight of the empty shells was enough to resolve the issue..

they dont get ejected?

just noticed the cannons in the cockpit, dam that must have been noisy