Author Topic: P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"  (Read 3136 times)

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2008, 10:08:59 AM »
forrest for the trees.

your talking about method.

the end result is the same.
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2008, 10:18:09 AM »
Negative. AA bleeds out different pixels at different transparencies to give the illusion of a smooth line over a jagged grid. Non-AA blending gives you a jagged line but fades the colors. It's not the same result and not the same method. Neither is perfect for what we need them to be (panel lines), but they're by no means the same.

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2008, 10:58:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Citabria
I can blow your whole jagged lines don't use antialiasing theory out of the water with one simple fact.

everyone uses transparency for single pixel lines to make them look thinner. this is a form of antialiasing using transparency to reduce size.

antialiasing a slanted or curved line is no different when you think about it. makes no difference if 1 pixel or 2 are used when you are using 10-20% fill or opacity every single line curved or not is antialiased regardless.


Good point.
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2008, 07:59:35 PM »
Panel lines redone with Anti-Alienated on Mr. Spock.

Final review before submittal.





Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15678
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2008, 06:14:52 AM »
Looks beautiful fencer!


Well done.
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2008, 06:34:56 AM »
Looks great, Fencer.   Really like the texture of the paint- looks worn and faded.

I don't have any decent P-47 resources - but a question about the wing tip nav lights - did they have clear lenses with red and green colored bulbs?   Or shold the lenses be shaded?

Offline Major Biggles

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2987
      • 71 Squadron Website
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2008, 08:08:37 AM »
fencer, i know it sounds really pathetic for my opinion to change so much over just panel lines, but that skin is just perfect now IMO. looks absolutely gorgeous! wtg! :aok


i think the reason AA makes such a difference is that the weathering and skin shading just fades really well into AA panel lines.



i definitely have a new jug skin, great job :)

71 'Eagle' Squadron RAF

Member DFC

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2008, 11:12:34 AM »
Oboe I will check my references and get back to you on that.

Thanks All.
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #23 on: February 19, 2008, 12:39:13 PM »
No worries, I did some checking on airliners.net, and they seem to be clear plastic lenses - you can see right in to the metal structure inside the wing.

An example

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
P-47D 404th FG "Sigma Nu Girl"
« Reply #24 on: February 19, 2008, 05:14:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by oboe
No worries, I did some checking on airliners.net, and they seem to be clear plastic lenses - you can see right in to the metal structure inside the wing.

An example


Yeah I did the same thing.  I wanted to take a look at the WW2 era photos too though.  Looks like they had a small red or green bulb inside there.  I think I will go as depicted.  

Also I did pick up the largish underwing light that was missing when originally depicted above.
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.