Author Topic: no HO's?  (Read 1243 times)

Offline uberslet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 873
no HO's?
« on: February 17, 2008, 09:55:52 AM »
was thinking, i see MANY pilots HO on first pass in like LA's wen they could easily out manuever my plane (imma a noob in 1-1, so a lot can beat me). and i was thinking, to end this, y not make BOTH pilots have to WORK for a kill, and if they cant, then allow a HO, i know this is a cartoon game, and in real life HO's wer preferred by many; but im not sure in real life a HO was used as much as  it is in game. the occasional first pass HO is fine, but as I said earlier, the first pass HO is WAY over used. just and idea.
MasonZ - In-game ID
=Wings of Terror= - MA Squad
"Only the dead have seen the end of war" - Plato

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: no HO's?
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2008, 02:01:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by uberslet
was thinking, i see MANY pilots HO on first pass in like LA's wen they could easily out manuever my plane (imma a noob in 1-1, so a lot can beat me). and i was thinking, to end this, y not make BOTH pilots have to WORK for a kill, and if they cant, then allow a HO, i know this is a cartoon game, and in real life HO's wer preferred by many; but im not sure in real life a HO was used as much as  it is in game. the occasional first pass HO is fine, but as I said earlier, the first pass HO is WAY over used. just and idea.


                      uberslet I think I understand the gist of what your saying. I think. First off when I fly LA7s I get HO'd all the time by none LA7 airplanes. So much so, and so many times, that when Im in the MA now Im shooting everyone in the face that I can.

                     In a furball slanting away for separation isnt that easy when you have to worry about the other 14 airplanes all around you. I went a few weeks swearing I wouldnt shoot first and HO but quickly found out that everyone else will shoot you. So now I shoot first If I can. And at this point I dont believe anyone when they say they dont HO.

                   Ther are a lot of planes more manueverable then the LA. You should wait until you have at least 6 mos in the game before you start blaming LA7s for everything.:D
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline uberslet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 873
no HO's?
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2008, 02:36:23 PM »
i have 1.5 yrs in the game. i try to avoid the HO's, but do HO sometimes. and i shouldnt really blame EVERYTHING on the la7's, cuz most all planes HO. but as I sed, it seems over used vs other ACM's
MasonZ - In-game ID
=Wings of Terror= - MA Squad
"Only the dead have seen the end of war" - Plato

Offline Stang

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6127
no HO's?
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2008, 02:54:43 PM »
Is this thread my fault?

:lol

Offline mentalguy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 667
no HO's?
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2008, 08:18:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Stang
Is this thread my fault?

:lol




Yes.


















:D
PFC. Corey "Mentalguy" Gibson
USMC

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
no HO's?
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2008, 08:33:41 PM »
Capital letters at the start of sentences Uberslet..

I don't think artificial HO cones like AW (?) had are interesting, even temporary (first pass; good luck coding that).
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
no HO's?
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2008, 08:40:43 PM »
If you want to HO on the first I say go for it. If you don't then just don't. If you choose to not HO and the other guy does and kills you then you have just failed at avoiding a HO. That's just my way of looking at it.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
no HO's?
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2008, 10:16:59 PM »
Latrobe I generally agree with you, however there are some aircraft (*cough* Hurri2C *cough*) that have the unfortunate capability of reversing into a HO at INSANELY short distances (had a 2C on MORE than one occasion swing around from almost DEAD SIX on his tail to a full HO in under 200yds closure at high speed).

That said, there's a couple of more-often-than-not successful methods of cheating the guy intent on HOing:

Pull into a hard zoom above him before he can fire -- If executed with proper timing, the rate of closure will be too great for him to get his nose up enough for more than a split-second snapshot at an awful deflection angle. I have more success with this than any other method, because once I'm above him, it's just a matter of kicking hard inside rudder and rolling over on top of him. If he commits to the HO, he's effectively throwing all his other options out the window.

Nose down to duck under him -- Generally riskier, as you're giving him a shot at your cockpit. Also, there's suspicion that the game under-models the effects of negative Gs on the pilot so it's a lot easier for a persistent opponent to depress his nose enough than it may supposed to be. Either way, as above the closure rate should give him a poor snapshot at a bad angle, at best.

Snaproll -- Never underestimate the effectiveness of a well-timed and executed snap-roll. The tight corkscrew pattern can make lining up for the shot against you problematic, and it also very rapidly alters your E-state. The combination of these two factors will frequently be enough to throw off your opponent's aim. The downside is that the recovery time and loss of E limits your options to respond once you've cleared the merge.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
no HO's?
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2008, 10:23:20 PM »
Don't confuse what a HO actually is.  

The HO that many disdain is the HO on a first merge (primarily one on one), thus the cold guns merge rule in the DA.  Most would agree that once past the opening merge anything goes.  In a furball or an outnumbered situation all "honor" goes out the window and anything goes at any time.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
no HO's?
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2008, 10:37:51 PM »
So if you're in an engagement that boils down entirely to a series of direct nose-on passes, lather, rinse repeat, one after another, the only one that's ACTUALLY a HO is the first one?

Couldn't DISagree more with that assessment.

Whether it's the initial merge in a fight, or the second, third, fourth, or you're working the guy for angles and all the sudden he decides to say "Screw it" and turns into you for a direct nose-on shot as far as I'm concerned is a HO.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
no HO's?
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2008, 10:44:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saxman
Snaproll -- Never underestimate the effectiveness of a well-timed and executed snap-roll. The tight corkscrew pattern can make lining up for the shot against you problematic, and it also very rapidly alters your E-state. The combination of these two factors will frequently be enough to throw off your opponent's aim. The downside is that the recovery time and loss of E limits your options to respond once you've cleared the merge.



This is the one move that I use all the time against a HO, and it works 99% of the time.

Offline DoNKeY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1304
no HO's?
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2008, 10:51:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saxman
So if you're in an engagement that boils down entirely to a series of direct nose-on passes, lather, rinse repeat, one after another, the only one that's ACTUALLY a HO is the first one?

Couldn't DISagree more with that assessment.

Whether it's the initial merge in a fight, or the second, third, fourth, or you're working the guy for angles and all the sudden he decides to say "Screw it" and turns into you for a direct nose-on shot as far as I'm concerned is a HO.


Gotta go with Sax on this one.

I hate it when I try to work angles to get on someone's six when all they do is keep turning to put their nose on me for the HO.   I'm not going to play back and push aggressively for that front quarter shot if I know that they are trying their hardest to just turn it into a HO with no thought of taking damage or getting shot down, as long as they "get me."  I just can't put myself into a situation that gives me 50% odds of living, and worse odds of coming out of it untouched.  I need everything on my 38, despite the fact of having double.:D  And I'm usually so deep in a knife fight that I don't always have the E to evade properly once I see them pushing for that HO, and so I try to avoid (because of the stated reasons above), and usually take some type of damage.  But hey I guess that's my fault...

donkey
2sBlind

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
no HO's?
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2008, 10:56:17 PM »
I only ho certain planes and certain situation here it is:

1. 262 mainly cuz im never gonna get it to turn and i cant outrun it unless im in 1
2. Tempest cuz its always higher than me and i will prolly let a pilot get away if he tries to turn with me.
3 Any plane that tries to cherry pick me, my only affective defense that will kill it.


These should be really the only circumstances for a ho
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
no HO's?
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2008, 01:34:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saxman
So if you're in an engagement that boils down entirely to a series of direct nose-on passes, lather, rinse repeat, one after another, the only one that's ACTUALLY a HO is the first one?

Couldn't DISagree more with that assessment.

Whether it's the initial merge in a fight, or the second, third, fourth, or you're working the guy for angles and all the sudden he decides to say "Screw it" and turns into you for a direct nose-on shot as far as I'm concerned is a HO.


That may be your viewpoint but I've fought a lot of very good, highly respected sticks over the years and they have all taken that shot if it was given after the opening merge.  I'm still a little surprised at it from some guys (many who preach no HO).  

I agree it's still a HO but at that point it seems to be both expected and accepted from every engagement I've been in over almost 12 years.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
no HO's?
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2008, 01:48:36 AM »
Learn to shoot accurately, or learn to avoid. It's really that simple.

This is one particular "tactic" that is not liable to change soon. We've got more noobs than ever, and they really couldn't care less what you guys consider a sporting kill. Most of them can't read anyway, so even if they see all these HO threads from over the years, it still won't matter.
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech