Author Topic: why not a perked jug? P-47M  (Read 1382 times)

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« on: February 18, 2008, 12:19:25 PM »
1: easy to add,,  used the D30 airframe

2: R-2800 C producing 2800HP with H2O

3: 473MPH top speed


4: went operational with the 56th FG in april 1945, by the end of the war the either 56th was equipped with Ms

5: scored kills during the war, most notably against several 262s



it saw action, and enitre FG used them during the war, it got kills during the war


would be a piece of cake to add the M variant to the line up, no new model needed.. just the necessary changes to the FM, and a skin.

it would need to be perked of course, carry about the same prices at the Spit14 or there abouts I would think

PLEEEEESE!!

:)


EDIT:  I realized I should have posted this in the wishlist section (and have done so) and selected to delete this thread, but for whatever reason it will not go away... I tried
« Last Edit: February 18, 2008, 12:25:08 PM by Wingnutt »

Offline Rebel

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2008, 12:21:54 PM »
YES YES YES YES!!!!  

While you're at it, a D-15 with a paddleblade ;)  

Hell, even upgrade the  D-11 with the paddle prop!  :D
"You rebel scum"

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2008, 06:43:56 PM »
Because it would give land based assets access to something that could compete with the F4U4. The N is good - but the M is ridiculous.


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2008, 07:05:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wolfala
Because it would give land based assets access to something that could compete with the F4U4. The N is good - but the M is ridiculous.


hence the necessity to perk it..

as for the N being "good" well..

under mil power the N is slower than the D40 from sea level to about 27K after which its only marginally faster

the N's climb rate under mil AND under wep power is FAR worse than the D40 till about 17K then its only marginally better with WEP.

the Ns turn radius is the same as the D40 with no flaps, worse with

the only thing the N has over the 40 is top speed with WEP engauged.. thats about it untill you get to 30+ K then the Ns performance is only marginally better.

under virtually every other circumstance and all realistic altitudes its inferior to the D40.


aside from top speed under wep.. the 47N is the worst jug in the game.

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2008, 09:05:25 PM »
I think I saw it stated somewhere that the 'paddle prop' is already modeled....a moot point anyway since it wouldn't come into play until high alt, and most everything happens under 10
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2008, 11:09:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bj229r
I think I saw it stated somewhere that the 'paddle prop' is already modeled....a moot point anyway since it wouldn't come into play until high alt, and most everything happens under 10


the M would have a significant performance increase over the D40 at any alt, right down to the deck.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2008, 11:47:57 PM »
Since you decided to have two threads, I'll ask in this one too.


Why do we need a P-47M?  It was extremely rare.

We don't need a Spitfire F.21.

We don't need and Re.2005.

We don't need a P-51H.


What makes the P-47M so special?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2008, 12:03:30 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Since you decided to have two threads, I'll ask in this one too.


Why do we need a P-47M?  It was extremely rare.

We don't need a Spitfire F.21.

We don't need and Re.2005.

We don't need a P-51H.


What makes the P-47M so special?


I didnt choose to have 2 threads..

this EFFED up sit's delete option doesent work..


why is it special?

well.. incase you didnt read..

it was the best production jug of the war.. one of the fastest prop drive planes of the war (fasted jug of the war)

the jug being arguably one of the most versatile aircraft in the war.. and the M is the ultimate expression of that.

that and the fact that the current N model we have.. is inferior to the other models in almost every aspect.. as it should be.. in real life the N was built for long range, not high performance..  the result being that in almost any situation it is inferior to the D40..

the M would be to the jugs what the -4 is to the corsairs, and the spit14 is  to the spitfires..
« Last Edit: February 19, 2008, 12:05:57 AM by Wingnutt »

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2008, 12:08:10 AM »
On another note..

I find it amusing, that anytime someone posts a suggestion here (or wishlist) for a plane..  soo many people ***** AND COMPLAIN that it will be a "hangar queen"  (see p39)

her im suggesting a ride that would actually be used, would be effective against the other late war rides..  etc etc.. and meets the criteria to be added to the game.

more *****ing.. go figure.

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2008, 12:10:40 AM »
SOMEONE, ANYONE

DELETE THIS THREAT, ITS A DUPLICATE, IM SICK OF ANSWERING REPLIES TO BOTH[/B]

I tried deleting it, about 2 minutes after I made it and realized it was in the wrong section..

the site said it was deleted, but yet here it is...

nice.


I wont answer any more replies to the thread,

refer to the one in the wish list section.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8804
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2008, 12:22:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wingnutt
the M would have a significant performance increase over the D40 at any alt, right down to the deck.


I read a story about the P-47M that you may find interesting. I photocopied the story for my archive. The story is attributed to Maj. George Bostwick.

Flying over Britain during a test hop of a P-47M, Bostwick was putting the new fighter through its paces. This was one of the Ms that had its reliability issues fixed and he was checking out a new motor.

At about 10,000 feet, Bostwick found himself flying near a formation of four RAF Tempests. He slid his Jug in alongside and waved. The nearest pilot waved back. Bostwick eased up military power and the P-47 began to pull ahead. Having taken the bait, Black smoke poured out of the exhaust stacks of the Sabre's in the Tempests. All four surged ahead of the P-47. Bostwick let the Tempests pull out ahead about 100 yards. He then pushed up the throttle into WEP. "My Thunderbolt literally leaped forward, quickly overtaking the Tempests. As I rushed past, I gave them a thumbs up." Bostwick then eased back the stick and zoomed up in a climb leaving the Tempest pilots to "wonder what the hell kind of P-47 that was."

A P-47M using 150 octane avgas could pull up to 80" of MAP. State side tests with 44-1 avgas showed a max speed of 381 mph at SL, 411 mph at 10k and 485 mph at 32k. Using this same fuel, a P-47D-22 managed 444 mph using 72" MAP (2,600 hp) at 23,600 feet.

We would not get 150 octane fuel (maybe for a perk in the distant future, but I doubt it). Nonetheless, the P-47M would be a beast in the MA.

Also, more P-47Ms saw combat than did Ta 152s..... Three full squadrons were active over the last month of the war in Europe.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2008, 12:27:04 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Widewing

Also, more P-47Ms saw combat than did Ta 152s..... Three full squadrons were active over the last month of the war in Europe.

My regards,

Widewing

But, how many of those 'Active' 47M's actually saw combat? Compared to the 152?

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2008, 12:29:04 AM »
Ever noticed how the n00bs always want the ultra-uber last of their line planes and never the first model of such plane?

Odd, innit?
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2008, 12:30:08 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DiabloTX
Ever noticed how the n00bs always want the ultra-uber last of their line planes and never the first model of such plane?

Odd, innit?

Vote Ar-68 :aok

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
why not a perked jug? P-47M
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2008, 12:33:40 AM »
Spitfire Mk XIV went into active service in January of 1944.  They built 957 of them.

The P-47M is not the P-47 equivilent of the Spitfire Mk XIV.  It is the P-47 equivilent of the Spitfire F.21.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-