Author Topic: Another Russian Tank  (Read 1663 times)

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Another Russian Tank
« on: February 20, 2008, 02:00:49 AM »
Since everyone is asking for newer tanks...... Here is my two cents

We need the JS-2 Heavy Russian tank

Of course i dont know ANYthing about it:rofl

But I saw a pic of it in a magazine and it looked pretty powerful
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2008, 02:19:06 AM »
As long as we get this for the default skin.

Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline JagdTankker

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 306
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2008, 06:43:49 AM »
you mean the iS2.2 part ammo, 33 second load time for a 122mm gun.200mm of frontal armor plate.To bad it would never be modeled right in this game.
<<---chasing the flock of Seagulls-aka JG/11

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2008, 07:42:33 AM »
But it was made to withstand the Tiger's 88mm gun and could easily take it AND the Panther Tank on. It would be like the Super Perk of tanks.
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Gabriel

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 207
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2008, 07:55:54 AM »
I'd prefer a T 44 or T 34/85

Offline Denniss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2008, 10:09:49 AM »
The IS-2 image is of a IS-2 model 1944 (or of a later, modified variant, the Is-2 m1944 were built from June 1944 on and had a maximum armor of 120 mm on the hull and 100mm on the turret.
Panther was able to pierce this IS-2 frontally at ranges of 1km and slightly above, Tiger 1 at ranges below 1km and Königstiger/Nashorn were able to achieve much longer ranged kills.

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2008, 11:17:00 AM »
I think most people would experience the terrible load times of the Stalin and never take it out again. It was actually an open country breakthrough tank which is a complete opposite to the way Tanks operate in AH. Not just that but the Stalin had a rather poor aiming system which negated much of the long range advantage the big gun gave it.

                     Had the JS been fitted with the far better 100mm gun, and had a better sighting system, this could have been a really great tank. As it was it was still the right tank at the right time, however, Im not sure it would fit into AH very well.

                   But I guess it all depends on modeling.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline ridley1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 677
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #7 on: February 20, 2008, 12:26:09 PM »
how about a KV-1...My eyesight sucks and I need a large target

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #8 on: February 20, 2008, 03:08:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ridley1
how about a KV-1...My eyesight sucks and I need a large target


You want a big target, go for the KV-3.

Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline ridley1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 677
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #9 on: February 20, 2008, 05:16:39 PM »
either  one....they both have a 2 story turret on them

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #10 on: February 20, 2008, 05:45:18 PM »
Still Russia needs a heavy tank in  AHII
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #11 on: February 20, 2008, 05:47:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by angelsandair
Still Russia needs a heavy tank in  AHII

They need early war fighters *coughyakovlevscough* and *a* bomber more than they need a heavy tank..

Offline ridley1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 677
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #12 on: February 20, 2008, 05:54:08 PM »
A Pe-2 most definitely....at risk of hijacking thread

Offline Iron_Cross

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #13 on: February 20, 2008, 05:59:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Treize69
As long as we get this for the default skin.



That is a sissy girlie tank, you will not catch me riding in that sissy girlie tank. Only sissy girlie men ride in pink tanks.  Give me a tank with pump'atude, like the SU-100, or the JagdTiger, Ja! [/Schwarzenegger]

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Another Russian Tank
« Reply #14 on: February 20, 2008, 06:18:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rich46yo
I think most people would experience the terrible load times of the Stalin and never take it out again. It was actually an open country breakthrough tank which is a complete opposite to the way Tanks operate in AH. Not just that but the Stalin had a rather poor aiming system which negated much of the long range advantage the big gun gave it.

                     Had the JS been fitted with the far better 100mm gun, and had a better sighting system, this could have been a really great tank. As it was it was still the right tank at the right time, however, Im not sure it would fit into AH very well.

                   But I guess it all depends on modeling.


Wouldn't want to use it in normal TT style combat, thats for sure- but used hull-down in one of those CV revetments at the V-Bases, or hidden near a choke point... even on top of a hill overlooking a friendly spawn to keep it clear of campers (or as a spawn camper) it would make one hell of a defensive tank. Not saying I want to see it included, but playing devils advocate.

Slow reload time isn't really such a handicap when you can stay at stand-off range and almost be guaranteed of a "1-hit, 1-kill" scenario.You'd almost be required to either send in waves of Tigers or to carpet bomb them into snail snot. Panzers, Shermans and even T-34s would be absolute cannon fodder against a 100 mm cannon on a JS-1 or the 122mm cannon on the JS-2 (think M1A1 Abrams vs M4 Sherman here...)

« Last Edit: February 20, 2008, 06:24:37 PM by Treize69 »
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.