Author Topic: Heller Amicus Briefs  (Read 189 times)

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Heller Amicus Briefs
« on: February 25, 2008, 08:39:35 PM »
I'll admit I'm surprised. I didn't think the Congress would get into this in such a big way.

Quote
Vice President Cheney signed on to a brief filed by a majority of Congress yesterday that urged the Supreme Court to uphold a ruling that the District of Columbia’s handgun ban is unconstitutional, breaking with his own administration’s official position.

Cheney joined 55 senators and 250 House members in asking the court to find that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess firearms and to uphold a lower court’s ruling that the D.C. ban violates that right. That position is at odds with the one put forward by the administration, which angered gun rights advocates when it suggested that the justices return the case to lower courts for further review.

In order to make his dramatic break with the administration, Cheney invoked his rarely used status as part of Congress, joining the brief as “President of the United States Senate, Richard B. Cheney.” It is a position he has used at times to make the point that he is sometimes part of the legislative branch and sometimes part of the executive.



The Libertarian part also filed a brief in support of Heller's position.

There's some pretty interesting reading out there; search for "heller amicus brief".
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Heller Amicus Briefs
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2008, 08:22:19 AM »
I really am surprised that congress had the guts to do anything for individual rights.

It does seem to validate the notion that the democrats took over only because their candidates all espoused strong second amendment rights views.

lazs