Author Topic: I'm with Congress (Read 2274 times)

crockett · « **Reply #15 on:** February 23, 2008, 01:32:40 PM »

"Bush charges the bill would empower trial lawyers". Is he saying Lawyers are terrorists now..

Isn't that the same line he uses for terrorism.. "would empower the terrorists".

I'm in the middle here, while I do agree with Congress 100% on this. I have to agree laywers are terrorists and I think we should start bombing them.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #16 on:** February 23, 2008, 01:33:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Rich46yo

Its funny but most people here distrust Government cause its trying to take their guns away. But the ones backing this terrorism bill are also the ones mostly blocking anti-gun legislation.

and thats the problem with the right.

just like the left they protect parts of the consitution and at the same time erode or try to outright ignore other parts.

Why I said there is no lessor of two Evils.
They are ALL evil

And by the same token. those that are in support of the second ammendment are all for bills like this so the government can protect them

Bottom line. these things arent needed.
Had the government simply done their job using laws already in place.
there would not have been any buildings comming down on 9/11.
Let alone a "next time"

Fulmar · « **Reply #17 on:** February 23, 2008, 01:34:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Rich46yo
Maybe next time you'll be in the building the terrorists destroy.

crockett · « **Reply #18 on:** February 23, 2008, 01:36:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Rich46yo
Its funny but most people here distrust Government cause its trying to take their guns away. But the ones backing this terrorism bill are also the ones mostly blocking anti-gun legislation.

Yet on the flip side..

The ones whom support their gun rights from the evil commie liberals.. are the ones whom are most willing to give alway all their other rights and inch us to a police state one step at a time.

john9001 · « **Reply #19 on:** February 23, 2008, 01:37:43 PM »

i have to agree with Rich46yo on this, the terriorsts use our freedoms to attack us.

crockett · « **Reply #20 on:** February 23, 2008, 01:43:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
i have to agree with Rich46yo on this, the terriorsts use our freedoms to attack us.

So the simple fix is to take away our freedoms then they wont attack us?

Rich46yo · « **Reply #21 on:** February 23, 2008, 01:44:35 PM »

See Rule #4

Fulmar · « **Reply #22 on:** February 23, 2008, 02:02:41 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crockett
So the simple fix is to take away our freedoms then they wont attack us?

Duh? Here's to secret police random house searches!

Shamus · « **Reply #23 on:** February 23, 2008, 02:12:58 PM »

I am still having a hard time understanding why the government finds it so oppressive to be required to file an affidavit before a judge and obtain a warrant.

I know it can be a pain in the butt, but it is suppose to be.

shamus

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #24 on:** February 23, 2008, 02:13:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Rich46yo
See Rule #4

Yup thats me.
Im just the "fool on the hill"

I almost forgot. Your "Superman"
Your the one thats going to "protect me" from the bad guys

I al2ways find it amusing that the security types are always for taking rights and power away from the people and are all for more and more power for themselves to protect us.

C'mon. Admit it. what you really want is absolute power to protect us from ourselves and whateverboth real and perceived boogyman you can come up with.

And if we have "secret courts"
What makes you beleive we dont have a secret police force?

crockett · « **Reply #25 on:** February 23, 2008, 02:19:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Shamus
I am still having a hard time understanding why the government finds it so oppressive to be required to file an affidavit before a judge and obtain a warrant.

I know it can be a pain in the butt, but it is suppose to be.

shamus

The best part is they already have a legal system in place that would allow them to get speedy wire taps in case of an emergancy. It's just too bothersom for the Bush admin..

Everything they need is already there, they just can't be bothered to do it.

Eagler · « **Reply #26 on:** February 23, 2008, 02:23:19 PM »

it's just politics, the dems trying to tie bushs hands ... the ones that don't want it are the same group crying we didn't do enough to stop 9/11

don't worry, the bro or the ho will fix it all after Nov

LOL

Lumpy · « **Reply #27 on:** February 23, 2008, 02:23:27 PM »

Why would anyone want protection from terrorists? That's like saying to the terrorists that we're afraid of them and that they've won. Some people haven't though this through.

Eagler · « **Reply #28 on:** February 23, 2008, 02:24:41 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lumpy
Why would anyone want protection from terrorists? That's like saying to the terrorists that we're afraid of them and that they've won. Some people haven't though this through.

yes, like you

Lumpy · « **Reply #29 on:** February 23, 2008, 02:25:32 PM »

How so?