Author Topic: Realistic Ordance Options  (Read 1679 times)

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Realistic Ordance Options
« on: March 06, 2008, 03:55:14 PM »
Title says it all.....

Time delay fuzes for noe attacks. This option I like the least for a few reasons. I think the stukalancs would have a field day using these. If you require a minimum alt to arm you dont need time delay. So while effective in real life it would have some drawbacks in AH. Perk loadout?

Parabombs for noe attacks on towns, airfields and factorys. This has the same draw backs as above. However most para bombs were 250lb HE bombs or less I believe. This would mean a direct hit would be needed to take a tank out. I think the dweebs would stick to other more effective and easier methods. Again perk loadout?

Incendiary for use against towns, and ord/ammo bunkers. No real downsides to this one. Rewards tactile thinking and brings back some of the challenge to buffing requiring planning and commitment to target.

Landmines.......will be gamed but extremly useful. Would have to figure out a way to stop the dweebs. Definte perk loadout but would it keep the dweebs from camping spawns?

Ive been hoping for stuff like this for years.......maybe someday!


Strip(er)



All stuff asked before (I searched).....but people gripe if you punt a thread.

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2008, 04:48:34 PM »
Definte perk loadout but would it keep the dweebs from camping spawns?

Probably wouldn't be too hard to make mines inside the spawn radius ineffective. Probably based off the same code they use for field supplies. The spawn is an object, and supplies are based off a distance to an object.
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2008, 05:41:32 PM »
Fuses on bombs would re-enable the old carbomb exploit.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline snowey

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 196
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2008, 06:48:17 PM »
whats the old carpet bombing exploat and insted lets have 500ib bombs for the b-25 that have parachutes
snowey
=55th=VelociRaptors
Flying since tour 79
VansCrew is a traitor and deserves to be shot
yes i know i cant spell so don't say anything about it

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2008, 07:19:19 PM »
When I say time delay I mean less than 10 seconds......

Strip(er)

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2008, 08:26:12 PM »
whats the old carpet bombing exploat and insted lets have 500ib bombs for the b-25 that have parachutes

First, school will do you good. Keep trying.

Second, I don't think there were 500lb parafrags. Maybe, I dunno.

Third, he said CAR BOMB exploit. Set fuse for ten minutes, drop bombs. GV fight starts. Suddenly the entire area explodes as you drive by.
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2008, 08:48:22 PM »
Carbomb- Dropping ord while on the ground. Bombs go off, planes/GVs/whatever 'splode, you get kills.

I thought this went back to AW, but it has its own thread on this forum, so it must have been an early AH trick.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2008, 08:51:26 PM by hubsonfire »
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline snowey

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 196
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2008, 08:55:34 PM »
First, school will do you good. Keep trying.

Second, I don't think there were 500lb parafrags. Maybe, I dunno.

Third, he said CAR BOMB exploit. Set fuse for ten minutes, drop bombs. GV fight starts. Suddenly the entire area explodes as you drive by.
i am not sure what size they were they were ether 250ib or 50ib they have film of it i have seen it multiple times it is a b 25 it think because it was the pacific
snowey
=55th=VelociRaptors
Flying since tour 79
VansCrew is a traitor and deserves to be shot
yes i know i cant spell so don't say anything about it

Offline DPQ5

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 425
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2008, 10:27:28 PM »
carbomb thing sounds like somethin funny 2 c
29th Infantry Division
Darkest Hour Realism Unit
King Company
Sgt. Phillips

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2008, 07:52:35 AM »
No dpq5, it really wasn't.

Offline wrongwayric

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2008, 08:07:07 AM »
To stir the pot so to speak, how about actual gun load outs? If i'm not mistaken currently all gun rounds are modeled on a standard ball round. Now in real life there were planes that could select and mix and match ammo to there missions. 50cals really jump out as they had standard round, incendiery, and the AP. Not sure how effective the incendiery round was as i never really saw it's useage or effectiveness mentioned that much, but i do know the AP round was heavily used when attacking ground targets. If someone want's to do the research would be kind of interesting to know. Please feel free to correct me if i'm wrong because it's been awhile since i researched all this.

Offline Blammo

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 780
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2008, 09:44:01 AM »
I like the parafrags and the incendiaries.  Would be a hoot to see the whole town light up and burn down.
BLAMM0 - FACTA, NON VERBA!

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2008, 09:50:29 AM »
Napalm. :t
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2008, 12:56:36 PM »
I know Korea had napalm but did WW2?

Strip(er)

Offline SIG220

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 694
Re: Realistic Ordance Options
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2008, 05:14:31 PM »
I know Korea had napalm but did WW2?

Strip(er)

Napalm was invented by two scientists at Harvard University in 1943.  It's first use in WWII was in July 1944.

It was mainly used in the Pacific against the Japanese.

How do you think the B-29's managed to burn down all of those Japanese cities???   They used the M-69 firebomb cluster.

Here is some detailed info on this weapon:


* The most devastating conventional bomb used by the Americans in WWII was the M-69 incendiary cluster. The first Boeing B-29 raids against the Japanese mainland were performed in the fall of 1944, using high altitude daylight precision bombing with high explosive bombs. For various reasons, this strategy proved ineffective, and in the spring of 1945 the Army Air Force moved to low level incendiary bombing at night.

The M-69 firebomb had been developed earlier in the war and proved ideal for the task. The M-69 was a simple, clever weapon. It looked like a length of pipe, and weighed only 2.3 kilograms (6.2 pounds). As handling such a small weapon was inconvenient, and dropping quantities of small bombs from high altitude was wildly inaccurate, it was designed to be incorporated into an "aimable cluster", a type of finned cluster bomb that contained 38 of the M-69 firebombs.

The aimable cluster was a bundle of M-69s fitted with a nose shroud and tail assembly. It was dropped from high altitude and then broke apart at about 900 meters (2,000 feet), scattering its M-69s. Each M-69 then ejected a long strip of cloth to stabilize itself, and crashed nose-first into buildings below. On impact, it ignited its payload of napalm, which shot out of the tail of the bomb in a burning jet. Under optimum conditions, this jet could travel 45 meters (150 feet).

The M-69 was small and could not penetrate the roofs of solidly constructed buildings. However, most Japanese buildings were lightly built and extremely vulnerable to fire. A copy of a Japanese residential area was built in the US to test the M-69, and was incinerated in a test bombing.