« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Tank destroyer  (Read 3326 times)

Offline John Hynds

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #15 on: March 20, 2008, 11:14:36 AM »
We don't really need these types right now as we got the Tiger and Firefly. Would like to see assault gunslike the Stug. Or tank destroyes like M10 and Hetzer.

Logged

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #16 on: March 20, 2008, 03:48:48 PM »
M18 would be way more fun then the M10.

It was way faster.

Logged

Offline MachNum

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 106
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #17 on: March 20, 2008, 04:00:31 PM »
Is there any interest in fixing the ground based physics as opposed to adding new vehicles?
Logged

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #18 on: March 20, 2008, 11:08:22 PM »
What tank is that? It almost looks like a Panther but I cant see it well enough to tel.
Logged
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline John Hynds

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #19 on: March 21, 2008, 01:31:41 AM »
Which one? The one behind the pic of the StugIII is a Panther. The other one that has been hit in the front is a Jagdtiger. It was hit twice in the frontal armor by a 76mm firing AP rounds and no penetration. :O
Logged

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #20 on: March 21, 2008, 01:42:58 PM »
I personally wouldn't mind seeing the Jadgpanzer. It has the gun capable of killing the tiger, L/70 75mm where as the stug doesn't. It also has a very low profile and I believe a gun that traverses side to side better than the stug plus better armor protection.
Logged

Offline theNewB

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 262
      • http://www.greatergermany.net
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #21 on: March 22, 2008, 08:39:42 PM »
Quote
It was hit twice in the frontal armor by a 76mm firing AP rounds and no penetration.
indeed a 76mm couldnt do much against 250mm on the front superstructure. guessing the range was past 1.0-1.5k and the 12.8cm would pack a huge punch to anything we have in game, limited rounds though think it could only carry around 35-40 rounds... that and think bombing a tiger is hard imagine that behemoth rolling around.
Logged

Offline StugIII

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 127
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #22 on: March 22, 2008, 11:16:58 PM »
artillery would be cool too for base defense, have a couple guns, 2 or 3 guys, shooting tanks, that would be sweet, or even for the AvA for German bases have the 88mm.

http://wnet.suomi.net/kotisivu/harri.kaarre/images/88mm05.JPG
Logged

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #23 on: March 23, 2008, 01:05:42 AM »
Let's add the M1A1 Abrams for no perks, and the M1A2 with perks as well.
Logged
Quote from: DA98 on March 25, 2011, 09:05:45 AM
Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok

Offline Denniss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #24 on: March 23, 2008, 08:47:45 AM »
Quote from: theNewB on March 22, 2008, 08:39:42 PM
indeed a 76mm couldnt do much against 250mm on the front superstructure. guessing the range was past 1.0-1.5k and the 12.8cm would pack a huge punch to anything we have in game, limited rounds though think it could only carry around 35-40 rounds... that and think bombing a tiger is hard imagine that behemoth rolling around.

Frontal upper hull armor was 150 mm, frontal lower hull armor was 100 mm, only the superstructure front had 250 mm armor. The lower hull hit may have been a penetrating one but it's not really clearly visible.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Jagdtiger_3.jpg for another view
Logged

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #25 on: March 23, 2008, 12:33:55 PM »
Quote from: Pannono on March 15, 2008, 07:19:24 PM
SU-100 had 100mm gun that could fire 4-6 rounds per min
perk it higher than tiger
hows it sound guys?

That is one very good reason to never get caught below 5,000 feet... :noid
« Last Edit: March 23, 2008, 12:35:57 PM by Yossarian »
Logged
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #26 on: March 23, 2008, 12:41:38 PM »

                         I'd love to see the SU-100.
Logged
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline John Hynds

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #27 on: March 23, 2008, 08:32:26 PM »
No the lower hit did not penetrate. It is quite deeper than the upper hit though. I used to have a pic of this at a slightly different angle that didn't have the shadow in the lower hit but have lost it.
Logged

Offline snowey

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 196
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #28 on: March 24, 2008, 03:29:55 PM »
how about a Nashorn

it has to be perked its got an 88
Logged
snowey
=55th=VelociRaptors
Flying since tour 79
VansCrew is a traitor and deserves to be shot
yes i know i cant spell so don't say anything about it

Offline DPQ5

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 425
Re: Tank destroyer
« Reply #29 on: March 25, 2008, 06:20:50 PM »
ACHTUNG, PANZER!!!!!!
Logged
29th Infantry Division
Darkest Hour Realism Unit
King Company
Sgt. Phillips
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »