Author Topic: meteor  (Read 1079 times)

Offline h338

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
meteor
« on: March 18, 2008, 11:31:32 PM »
the british meteor jet would be cool  :D
sure it was there the last two months of the war and it will probably never get into acs high buyt it would be cool
IN GAME ID:MRjingls
MA:~~~THE UNFORGIVEN BW~~~
Jinglein all over the map since TOUR:86
claims the coolest name in Aces High

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: meteor
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2008, 02:22:59 AM »
did it see squadron strength? someone look this up. For all we know, it may have the requirements to get into AH
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Re: meteor
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2008, 03:05:36 AM »
did it see squadron strength? someone look this up. For all we know, it may have the requirements to get into AH

Yes.  Entered service in June 1944, operational debut in july, and during 1945 there were a squadron of Mk.III's that were actually based on the continent and were part of the 2nd TAF.  Although they couldnt find any LW aircraft in the air to fight with, they did destroy ground targets.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: meteor
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2008, 03:20:40 AM »
the british meteor jet would be cool :D
sure it was there the last two months of the war and it will probably never get into acs high buyt it would be cool

Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: meteor
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2008, 03:47:26 AM »
Bwaaa Haaa Haaa, you took the works right outta my mouth.  Since when was beingCOOL been part of the aircraft inclusion requirements for this sim?  :rofl

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4056
      • Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group
Re: meteor
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2008, 07:51:42 AM »
Since when was beingCOOL been part of the aircraft inclusion requirements for this sim?  :rofl

This is sig material. :aok
Operations Officer - Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group
C.O.: EZGlider
X.O.: Steely
Just a bunch of old farts having a great time raining destruction down upon the enemy.
https://www.dickweedhbg.com/

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: meteor
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2008, 07:55:55 AM »
Bwaaa Haaa Haaa, you took the works right outta my mouth.  Since when was beingCOOL been part of the aircraft inclusion requirements for this sim?  :rofl


Read all the "I want" threads. Youll find that 9 out of 10 have the line "cuz it wood b cool".
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15678
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: meteor
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2008, 08:18:46 AM »
still It would be cool to have!

1. Its British
2. its a perk jet other than German
3. Furball said so

The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline Pannono

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: meteor
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2008, 10:30:25 AM »
why? the 262 is better! 4x 20mms vs 4x 30mms. Who's gonna win?
Meteor: Maximum speed: Mach 0.71, 410 mph at 10,000 ft (660 km/h at 3,050 m)
262: Maximum speed: 541 mph (870 km/h)
Meteor: 4 x 20 mm British Hispano cannons
262: 4x 30 mm MK 108 cannons
Meteor: Range: 500 mi (800 km)
262: Range: 652 mi (1,050 km)
Pannono
Proud Member of Pigs On The Wing
8 Player H2H: 2006-07
MA Tours: 87, 97-113, 143-144, 160-Present
FSO: JG54

Offline EvlPrsn

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 131
Re: meteor
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2008, 10:55:32 AM »
would be kool for variety, but i know i wouldnt fly it either, the perk cost would be too high, and i'm playing this game to NOT fly jets...  i much prefer spits and p-38s and mossies...  speaking of which, un-perk the spit14!
If i said anything to offend u, plz ignore it.

also, if i say anything stupid or rude, it was probobly too late at night and i was half asleep, so ignore that too.

oh yeah, its all just my opinion, so if ya dont care, just keep it to urself, cuz if u dont care, i sure wont!

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Re: meteor
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2008, 10:55:57 AM »
it wuyd stil bee coolz.
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: meteor
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2008, 11:05:21 AM »
How about we let HTC finish the new version which might contain CT.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: meteor
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2008, 11:12:09 AM »
Larry: You'll find that 9 out of 10 of those threads thats say "It would be cool" are all the same posters.  :D



Pannono:
why? the 262 is better! 4x 20mms vs 4x 30mms. Who's gonna win?
Meteor: Maximum speed: Mach 0.71, 410 mph at 10,000 ft (660 km/h at 3,050 m)
262: Maximum speed: 541 mph (870 km/h)
Meteor: 4 x 20 mm British Hispano cannons
262: 4x 30 mm MK 108 cannons
Meteor: Range: 500 mi (800 km)
262: Range: 652 mi (1,050 km)

The Meteor's 4x Hispanos would be LIGHT years ahead of the 30mm crap cannons on the 262. 99% of the time I fire the 262 guns I miss despite having a perfect shot lined up. I'm not new to 30mm. I do well with 109s, 152s, 190a8s (with 30mm outboard), but on the 262 they're just porked.

You speeds are misleading. The 262's top speed is at 20-25k, so listing the speed of the Meteor at 10k is going to make it look pathetic. The Meteor was slower than the 262, but it was MUCH more manuverable, able to hold its own against spitfires in some tests.

So, quad hispano punch, nimble plane, can actually DOGFIGHT (262 can't claim that!) and it's a high-speed jet. Yeah, you'd be a fool to fly the 262 if this plane was available.

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: meteor
« Reply #13 on: March 19, 2008, 12:08:51 PM »
This is sig material. :aok

Thanks, Im glad you like it.  :salute

but it is true, I have seen soo many threads that ask for vehicles/aircraft based on their "cool factor".  :D

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Re: meteor
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2008, 12:33:34 PM »
Pannono:
The Meteor's 4x Hispanos would be LIGHT years ahead of the 30mm crap cannons on the 262. 99% of the time I fire the 262 guns I miss despite having a perfect shot lined up. I'm not new to 30mm. I do well with 109s, 152s, 190a8s (with 30mm outboard), but on the 262 they're just porked.

So... because you miss with the cannons in the 262 they must be wrong.  :lol

Sorry for the hijack, i will be quiet now.

IIRC correctly the Meteor III was superior to the Tempest V in all respects in a flight test, IMO it would be a less hardcore version of the 262 which would be easier for the majority of the AH community to fly and fight in.  The 262 takes some getting used to in order to get the best out of it.  The Meteor would be a great inbetween.

PS.  It is cool.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --