« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Ju- 52  (Read 1024 times)

Offline Novice3

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Ju- 52
« on: March 22, 2008, 10:52:44 AM »
Free Iron Aunt Annie!m Jeah being a part of German only squad it is somewhat wierd that we have to resort to flying c-47. Buth thank you HTC for Hanomag Halftrack  Keep up the good work!
Logged

Offline Gowan

  • Proation 9/22/2016
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 589
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2008, 11:44:11 AM »
SEARCH
Logged

Offline nirvana

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5640
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2008, 12:22:20 PM »
Why do you want the JU-52?  What advantages does it have over our current planes and vehicles?  Why is it worth HTCs time to model?

You need to answer some basic questions before you say "I want it because it was cool!" or "I want it because I'm in a German squad!".  No, negative.  You're not the only one to ask for it though so you're not alone by a long shot.
Logged
Who are you to wave your finger?

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4056
      • Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2008, 12:31:18 PM »
Quote from: nirvana on March 22, 2008, 12:22:20 PM
What advantages does it have over our current planes and vehicles?

I have to ask, why must we predominately ask for something better, more advantageous than what we have in the game? I see this attitude prevalent in many requests for new aircraft/vehicles. What is the real harm in asking for something that actually has LESS advantage over something else? I see using "lesser" aircraft/vehicles as a challenge, personally. Just a nagging thought. (DUCK!)
Logged
Operations Officer - Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group
C.O.: EZGlider
X.O.: Steely
Just a bunch of old farts having a great time raining destruction down upon the enemy.
https://www.dickweedhbg.com/

Offline nirvana

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5640
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2008, 12:44:35 PM »
I see your point Thundr, belay that question.  What about the other two though?
Logged
Who are you to wave your finger?

Offline Redlegs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1151
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2008, 12:49:15 PM »
Quote from: nirvana on March 22, 2008, 12:44:35 PM
I see your point Thundr, belay that question.  What about the other two though?


Quote from: nirvana on March 22, 2008, 12:22:20 PM
Why do you want the JU-52?    Why is it worth HTCs time to model?

He wants it because we should have an Axis transport.
Because it deserves to be in-game and fills up missing rolls.

Not every requested plane has to be a LW monster.
Logged
Resident Arizona Cardinals/Cincinnati Reds fan

Offline nirvana

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5640
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2008, 12:59:58 PM »
Historically accurate roles are the only spot I can see that it fits, otherwise it's just another transport plane which isn't a bad thing but is it something HTC should be concentrating on rather then CT or filling perhaps the French, Russian, or Italian plane set?
Logged
Who are you to wave your finger?

Offline Gowan

  • Proation 9/22/2016
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 589
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2008, 01:40:40 PM »
actually, it'll be only the 2nd tri-engine in the game (can anyone guess the first?) and its a goon with protection
Logged

Offline Lukanian-7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 243
      • Lukanian-7's MySpace
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2008, 01:59:33 PM »
I Have No Idea As To What The Tri-Engined Goon Plane You Speak Of Is Mr. Gowan.

 :O :O :O OMG Two Hippies In A Row! :O :O :O

Caution: Overuse Of Bright Colors May Burn Others' Eyes, As Hippies Are Immune
Logged

Offline spit16nooby

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2008, 02:06:41 PM »
what's the first a b-17 that lost an engine. No but seriously what is it. :huh
Logged

Offline Gowan

  • Proation 9/22/2016
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 589
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2008, 03:00:18 PM »
all i said is that it is a tri engine ^_^

search harder


*splashy splash*
Logged

Offline EvlPrsn

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 131
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2008, 03:58:47 PM »
hmm... tri engine...  PT BOAT!
Logged
If i said anything to offend u, plz ignore it.

also, if i say anything stupid or rude, it was probobly too late at night and i was half asleep, so ignore that too.

oh yeah, its all just my opinion, so if ya dont care, just keep it to urself, cuz if u dont care, i sure wont!

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2008, 04:57:51 PM »
Quote from: nirvana on March 22, 2008, 12:59:58 PM
Historically accurate roles are the only spot I can see that it fits, otherwise it's just another transport plane which isn't a bad thing but is it something HTC should be concentrating on rather then CT or filling perhaps the French, Russian, or Italian plane set?
Ok if you want the italian aircraft still in the game, how about this?
SM.84



JU-52

Logged
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline Gowan

  • Proation 9/22/2016
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 589
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2008, 09:28:37 PM »
Quote from: EvlPrsn on March 22, 2008, 03:58:47 PM
hmm... tri engine...  PT BOAT!

ding ding ding, we have a winner
Logged

Offline EvlPrsn

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 131
Re: Ju- 52
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2008, 10:36:38 PM »
Quote from: Gowan on March 22, 2008, 09:28:37 PM
ding ding ding, we have a winner


yay!  whats my prize?

/jk
Logged
If i said anything to offend u, plz ignore it.

also, if i say anything stupid or rude, it was probobly too late at night and i was half asleep, so ignore that too.

oh yeah, its all just my opinion, so if ya dont care, just keep it to urself, cuz if u dont care, i sure wont!
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »