Author Topic: Suggesting M8 Replacement  (Read 1894 times)

Offline USRanger

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10325
      • BoP Home
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #15 on: March 27, 2008, 10:22:56 PM »
With the rate of fire of the M8, I've shot down quite a few aircraft diving on me.  Just park under a tree so they have to get low to shoot at ya, then put a slug in their face! :aok

Oh yeah, give us the M18 ;)
Axis vs Allies Staff Member
☩ JG11 Sonderstaffel ☩
Flying 'Black[Death] 10' ☩JG11☩

Only the Proud, Only the Strong Ne Desit Virtus

Offline Devonai

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 268
      • Reckless Faith
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #16 on: March 27, 2008, 10:31:22 PM »
I'm all for more ground vehicles in AH2, but a pair of M8s working together can wreak havoc on the battlefield.  Plus, the Greyhound is still in use in some countries, which makes me jealous.
Guns!  Aliens!  Talking cats!  My new Science Fiction adventure, now on Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/David-Kantrowitz/e/B002BMHJPE/

Offline Selino631

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1493
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #17 on: March 27, 2008, 10:43:07 PM »
a enemy tiger was camping the hanger i managed to get out in a M8 drove around fired on him took out his pintle and kept driving around him shooting  and he coundt get his gun on me, i have done this twice
OEF 11-12

Offline C(Sea)Bass

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1644
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #18 on: March 27, 2008, 10:54:55 PM »
I forget where it was posted on here but, there is a historical account of an M8 killing a King Tiger with 3 shots to the rear at 75 yards IIRC.

If you get close enough you can kill anything with a M8. It may take 5 or 6 shots to the rear, but it is do able. Also if you want to do it the cheap way, drive up so your turret is inside the NME tank and fire. I accidentally did that and 1 shot killed a tiger.

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #19 on: March 28, 2008, 12:10:43 AM »
m8 killing a tiger is not BS unfortulantly I was killed by a gang of m8s in my tiger, fortunantly it was only 7 perks. that turret is just so damn slow


Why do you say that?


M8 is great to sneak up on takes and blow out thier turret. Once you do that you just sit there making them mad and after a few hits you kill them. BTW 3 or even 5 shots from an M8 are so fast that the tank wouldnt even knew what hit him.

In the early version of AHII when the woods were really thick I waited in them waiting for tanks to pass by then I would fire up and run them down. A tiger came by me and I knocked hit track out with 4 hits. By the time he started trying to turn his turret I was in first gear out running it circleing him poping him in the back of the turret. once that was out I got on the left side of him and started shooting where the driver would be. It only took about twenty rounds to finnish him off.


And like any other great upset I was called a cheater afterwards.
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline DPQ5

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 425
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #20 on: March 28, 2008, 01:48:33 AM »
was just about 2 make a thread about m18. m18 much better then m8, realy should add it.
29th Infantry Division
Darkest Hour Realism Unit
King Company
Sgt. Phillips

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #21 on: March 28, 2008, 09:39:57 AM »
I was unable to duplicate any of the claims in this thread.  Is there a particular spot on the Tiger than is vulnerable to the 37mm? 

I shot it all over, from every aspect... all the rounds bounce.  Granted, I believe this is how it should be based on armor penetration values for the gun, but I am puzzled as to how people can do what should be impossible and blow up Tigers in an M8.

Offline DPQ5

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 425
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #22 on: March 28, 2008, 01:17:02 PM »
yeah the back is
29th Infantry Division
Darkest Hour Realism Unit
King Company
Sgt. Phillips

Offline 5PointOh

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #23 on: March 28, 2008, 01:41:59 PM »
The M8 is a vulching machine :aok...till the field ack pops :mad:
Coprhead
Wings of Terror
Mossie Student Driver

Offline opposum

  • Probation
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 467
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #24 on: March 28, 2008, 02:45:18 PM »
ive killed a kingtiger with my m8 before
 :noid :noid :noid :noid :noid

one time i was vulching with the m8 on the end of the runway, i got 24 kills and it gave me 149 perks for it, i dont know how but it did







/_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline croduh

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2509
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #25 on: March 28, 2008, 03:27:11 PM »
I've killed whole Seventh United States Army with my old m8 once.Got 150 perks for it.Dunno how but i did

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #26 on: March 28, 2008, 07:38:07 PM »
I was unable to duplicate any of the claims in this thread.  Is there a particular spot on the Tiger than is vulnerable to the 37mm? 

I shot it all over, from every aspect... all the rounds bounce.  Granted, I believe this is how it should be based on armor penetration values for the gun, but I am puzzled as to how people can do what should be impossible and blow up Tigers in an M8.
Point blank at 90 degrees in the rear is your best bet.  Not sure if armor degradation is modeled or a slight randomness to the penetration, but pound them enough, when close enough, they eventually go down.

Also, make sure you are not carrying a mixed ammo load.  For some reason, unlike any of the tanks, the HE is default in an M8.  This might account for some of the bounce if you were close.

Best option IMO is to go for tracking the Tiger first.  You can do this at a greater range than damaging the tank itself.  Once he is tracked, if you are smart, you can fairly easily first track the other side (so he can't pivot), and then even more easily stay out of his oh so slow turret traverse.
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline ECHO44

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #27 on: March 28, 2008, 10:50:39 PM »
the m8 is still usefull, when my squad goes on vehicle missions we always have a m8 to scout the area and spot tanks for us. Yes, add the m18 but keep the m8
1 SENTAI ZERO ZEN

Offline 10thmd

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #28 on: March 29, 2008, 04:56:38 AM »
They gotta keep it for the Early War/Specific events. They arent gonna ditch any vehicles or planes even if they are Hanger Queens.
- Der Wander Zirkus -
“You can all go to hell; I will go to Texas

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Re: Suggesting M8 Replacement
« Reply #29 on: March 29, 2008, 06:44:12 AM »
How about adding something non American instead - another Russian GV perhaps?  Su-100 or ISU 152 maybe?
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --