Author Topic: Road & Track May 2008 issue  (Read 903 times)

Offline mg1942

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Road & Track May 2008 issue
« on: April 04, 2008, 09:30:21 PM »
Anyone seen the may cover?  It's Outrageous! :)

Offline mg1942

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2008, 01:33:42 PM »
It really is, I know many people are crying foul over the May issue.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2008, 01:35:14 PM »
When you actually get the car, start bragging.   
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2008, 01:41:40 PM »
It really is, I know many people are crying foul over the May issue.

Why are they crying?  Seriously, what are the complaints and issues?
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline mg1942

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2008, 02:41:01 PM »
When you actually get the car, start bragging.   

Gimme 6-7 years.  I'll wait for reliability data.  I predict there's only going to be slight changes.




Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2008, 02:49:04 PM »
Post up a pic otherwise this thread is worthless.

Well, it pretty much is anyway.
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline mg1942

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2008, 02:53:13 PM »
« Last Edit: April 05, 2008, 04:01:44 PM by mg1942 »

Offline mg1942

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2008, 02:56:17 PM »
Post up a pic otherwise this thread is worthless.

Well, it pretty much is anyway.

I read a complaint about me "posting too much pictures" :o 
« Last Edit: April 05, 2008, 04:17:55 PM by mg1942 »

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2008, 03:30:47 PM »
they are trying to sell a magazine, give them a break.

it's called "journalism".

Offline mg1942

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2008, 04:08:55 PM »
« Last Edit: April 05, 2008, 04:18:25 PM by mg1942 »

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2008, 04:14:32 PM »
I read a complaint about me "posting too much pictures" :o 

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)
No the complaint was linking it in every thread  to any obscure automotive reference.
Like I keep saying nice piece of tech.
See Rule #4

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #11 on: April 05, 2008, 04:51:21 PM »
What's funny about the so-called "spanking" is if you read the .pdf comparison between the three cars they are so close in performance in all-around consideration it's almost a 3-way tie. 

http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0508_ct_TechDetails.pdf

http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0508_ct_GTRZ06911_chart.pdf

Show me again where both the Corvette and the Porsche got spanked?  Beat in over-all comparison?  Yes.  But spanked?  That's Road & Track for you.
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2008, 05:43:46 PM »
The Exige S could take all of those three on that track and you'd have money in the bank.   
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline mg1942

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #13 on: April 05, 2008, 06:27:34 PM »
What's funny about the so-called "spanking" is if you read the .pdf comparison between the three cars they are so close in performance in all-around consideration it's almost a 3-way tie. 

http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0508_ct_TechDetails.pdf

http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0508_ct_GTRZ06911_chart.pdf

Show me again where both the Corvette and the Porsche got spanked?  Beat in over-all comparison?  Yes.  But spanked?  That's Road & Track for you.

Isn't a 5 sec gap what you call getting spanked in this technical track?  Like I said it's outrageous.

GT-R: 1:56:90

911 Turbo:  2:02:01
Z06:  2:02:02

Many people are calling foul on this test, there's no way a GT-R can do this.
If R/T gets more rants about this evaluation, I predict they will do a rematch, they may choose a track that will probably help 911 turbo / Z06 narrow that HUGE 5 sec gap.  Laguna Seca perhaps?
« Last Edit: April 05, 2008, 06:34:43 PM by mg1942 »

Offline Mark Luper

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1626
Re: Road & Track May 2008 issue
« Reply #14 on: April 05, 2008, 07:03:58 PM »
Dang thing is still ugly though  :eek:

Mark
MarkAT

Keep the shiny side up!