Author Topic: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...  (Read 1311 times)

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« on: April 23, 2008, 06:13:53 PM »
These are just a few aircraft that would be nice, IMO, to have ingame, even though there are very few events that they could be used for and no one would ever fly them in the MA.

First off, the Luftwaffe's ultimate super plane-

The Messerschmitt Bf. 109D was used in the closing stages of the Spanish Civil War, as well as the Blitz of Poland. With a top speed of a blazing 304 m/h, how can you NOT want this uber plane?  :lol

A Ju87B would also be nice to compliment this awesome new fighter.



A Bf109G6/AS and a Bf109G10 would be nice too... maybe even a Ta152C. Of course, we don't really need any of these aircraft, though I would certainly fly them. Just something a bit different to add some variety to the 'B29! Sumbarinez! N000KS!' monotony.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2008, 06:16:21 PM by Motherland »

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2008, 08:34:53 PM »
Hey Bubi,

I think there's two other aircraft we should whine for first:  The He111 and the Ju87G. :aok
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2008, 09:06:15 PM »
I wasnt being sarcastic when I said we didnt need these aircraft. Id much rather have the Ju52, He111, Ju87G, and a fleshed out Yak series.

But, Dora is the sexiest of the 109s and I beleive the Stuka B was the one equipped with dive sirens.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2008, 09:08:43 PM by Motherland »

Offline DoNKeY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1304
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2008, 09:13:31 PM »
P-38H right before these. :aok

donkey
2sBlind

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2008, 09:16:36 PM »
Oh great, another American medium bomber  :D

Offline DoNKeY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1304
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2008, 09:19:18 PM »
 :)
2sBlind

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2008, 09:52:29 PM »
I would say a huge yup to the Bf.109G6/AS.
Mmmm, more altitude performance :D

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10687
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #7 on: April 24, 2008, 01:44:52 AM »
I don't think any of them are silly I am all for having every thing that was used during the war. How ever it is not going to happen, it is the wish list so wish away no harm in that.

Offline ridley1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 677
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2008, 10:33:57 AM »
I want the BV 141

Just because it looks so freakin' weird.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blohm_%26_Voss_BV_141
 

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10687

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2008, 01:22:48 PM »
And I'd have to say the A-26 before all of the above, please  :aok
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2008, 02:45:50 PM »
Why do people always get so excited about the A26? Do we not have enough American level bombers?

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2008, 03:45:19 PM »
Why do people always get so excited about the A26? Do we not have enough American level bombers?

Because it's just so innately cool......

Personally, I think of it as being a rather omni-purpose plane...heavy fighter (low/medium altitude bomber etc.).  I don't know the facts though.

Also, the Beaufighter IMO is super-cool*....but that may be just because: a)  I'm British, and b)  it is  ;)
*i.e. I'd like this as well

<S>

Yossarian

P.S. And yes, I do find it very hard to request something without using the word 'cool'  :D
P.P.S. Sorry for hijacking your thread  :o
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline Wes14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2996
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2008, 04:46:44 PM »

 
:D
Warning! The above post may induce: nausea, confusion, headaches, explosive diarrhea, anger, vomiting, and whining. Also this post may not make any sense, or may lead to the hijack of the thread.

-Regards,
Wes14

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10687
Re: A couple silly aircraft that we dont really need...
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2008, 06:17:25 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)
 
:D
I would go with this or any other axis planes or even a few Russian bombers.