We NEED

[wrag]

a 109g10!

So there

[NOT]

 




NOT

[Bruv119]

g10 = K4.

[Anaxogoras]

g10 = K4.

Just because you say it's so, doesn't make it so.

They are two different aircraft with different top speeds, different armaments, and different modification kits.  For one thing, the G-10 could have a MG-151 instead of an MK-108.

[Bruv119]

apologies gavagai.

In terms of performance not counting armament I believe if you were to quote the top speeds etc.  They were very similar. 

Now the G10 was in AH and it was taken out and replaced with the K-4 and G14.  The g14 represents the lack of armament and the k4 the excellent speed/climb.   We might aswell be going around in circles remove the k4 and g14 and replace it with the g10???

[Soulyss]

a 109g10!

So there

Hey... .how did you get back in?   

We'll have to have a talk with #1, server was down for days and now apparently all for naught...

[evenhaim]

k4 and g14 are the replacements for the g10 and they do a fine job as is, even g10 skins are allowed for the g14 If im not mistaken. No point in modeling another g10 when that time could be spent on a me410

[Anaxogoras]

apologies gavagai.

In terms of performance not counting armament I believe if you were to quote the top speeds etc.  They were very similar. 

Now the G10 was in AH and it was taken out and replaced with the K-4 and G14.  The g14 represents the lack of armament and the k4 the excellent speed/climb.   We might aswell be going around in circles remove the k4 and g14 and replace it with the g10???

Why the excluded alternative?  There's nothing to prevent the G-10 from being reintroduced, while keeping the G-14 and K-4.

[macleod01]

While your at it, they could add the Spitfire Mk IIa? I would love that! And add another plane to the long list of varients for both the 109 and the Spitfire

[Pannono]

isnt the seafire we have the Mk IIa?

[Banshee7]

isnt the seafire we have the Mk IIa?

Mk IIc i believe.

[Pannono]

Mk IIc i believe.

cc you're right