B-17F seemed to be a good achievement for the US.

[Rambo Fan]

I know the B-17F led to the more upgraded design of the B-17G we fly in aces high. But it would be a good idea to add the ancestor of the B-17G, which did earn its right as the flying fortress. To add to that i thought it was neat knowing that it was outperforming the Douglas, a very small, maneuverable dive bomber used in Aces high. It was a sturdy aircraft able to take serious flame or explosive damage, and could return and land with all this conditions. I don't know what you people think. If you want some more info to convince you, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-17_Flying_Fortress. Its a great plane, saw alot of action, dropped more than 500,000 bombs on Germany in WWII. 

Well im going to go to sleep, can't, maybe can wait for your replies in the morning. 

Im new so be careful, im new at this sorta thing. 

[moot]

Welcome, Rambo Fan.

[Saxman]

I posted a thread on this before the forums crapped out, but early-model B-17s would be invaluable for the Early and Mid War arenas, as well as AvA, Scenario and FSO play.

I'd say a B-17F for all theaters (B-17G is inappropriate for any Pacific scenario) as well as either the B-17D or E for early PTO setups. Also an earlier B-24, and earlier British heavy and medium bombers.

However there are bigger gaps in the medium and heavy bomber lineup right now--the Japanese, Germans and Russians in particular--that should be filled first.

[Rambo Fan]

I agree, AH doesn't have any Japanese tanks...