I'm confused. Wouldn't the game have to be "Real" in order for someone criticizing it to qualify as an "armchair" general ? Isn't that what they call the talking heads on TV who give us advise on how to fight real conflicts 2,000 miles away ? Wouldn't that person also have to be someone Removed from the actual combat ?
And the people doing the criticizing in the main arena ARE actually in the game fighting it, arn't they ? That doesn't seem to fit the definition of an "armchair" general. "Armchair" meaning once removed from the combat.
Are you suffering from the delusion that you're the Only person in the game fighting it correctly, while others are unfairly criticizing you ? Then you ask other people suffering from the same delusion to validate that for you. And they do it !
My advise to you is that you should give this some thought and seek help.
The Armchair Psychiatrist,