Author Topic: pot $$$$$  (Read 612 times)

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
pot $$$$$
« on: June 12, 2008, 12:44:58 AM »
$84,000,000 for 35,000 plants, thats $2400 a plant??????? :huh



http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/3025668/

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17773
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2008, 12:53:52 AM »
Judging from the size of those plants.

That number has been grossly exaggerated.

Certainly sounds better then the few hundred dollars it MIGHT produce
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2008, 01:19:00 AM »
Judging from the size of those plants.

That number has been grossly exaggerated.

Certainly sounds better then the few hundred dollars it MIGHT produce
:aok  dead on there, those estimates are very optimistic at best.

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5705
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2008, 03:02:20 AM »
Our govt spends $10,000,000 a year of taxpayer money to have a contractor grow weed for medicinal use...One of it's most recent discoveries for it's medicinal use is for the treatment of Glycoma.

Yet it remains illegal..Where as alcohol(which has never helped anyone see straight) remains perfectly legal..and is taxed to death.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2008, 03:04:19 AM by SirLoin »
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline indy007

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3294
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2008, 08:23:36 AM »
Actually those numbers could easily be an underestimation if you base it on street value. If they're a well developed strain, you're looking at $400 per ounce at street level prices. At a 2 pound yield per adult plant, 16 ounces to a pound, with 35,000 plants, you're looking at a potential value of $448 million.

That would be from the field, direct to the street. I'm sure there's bulk discounts involved somewhere.

It's still a *$!#load of money though.  :O

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2008, 08:27:42 AM »
exaggerated for sure but pot is a huge moneymaker.. with a moneymaker like that... no crime is too much of a risk for a whole lot of folks.

lazs

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2008, 08:30:43 AM »
Count all the folks that you know that use marijuana (legally or otherwise) and admit to it.  Add AT LEAST 25% for the people that use it and lie about it.

If you could tax it like alcohol, I can't imagine that it would take long to reduce the national debt in no time flat.   :rofl
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline uptown

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8566
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2008, 08:54:06 AM »
they're not even mature yet.
Lighten up Francis

Offline Mustaine

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4139
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2008, 09:01:50 AM »
I once thought about a way to "legalize" pot:

You must register as a smoker, you get a credit card type thing, and it is rationed. The rationing is to keep someone from buying pot for others than themselves. sell it in 15 "joint" boxes like cigarettes, limit 1 person to 30 "joints" a month, basically 1 a day (each "joint" approximately the size of a Camel straight). To register you must be 21 and have no criminal record. Get busted for a crime (even a misdemeanor), lose pot license for 10 years.

Sell the pot for $30-$50 a box, thats $60-$100 for a months supply for 1 person. I'd bet it is a TON cheaper to make, distribute, and it would take in a windfall of money.
Genetically engineered in a lab, and raised by wolverines -- ]V[ E G A D E T ]-[
AoM DFC ZLA BMF and a bunch of other acronyms.

Offline uptown

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8566
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2008, 09:03:37 AM »
When I lived in Missouri, there was a place along the Missouri river that was home to a rope factory back in the 1800s. Wild hemp would grow 8 or 10 foot tall. Every year around harvest time, the cops would chop it all down and put it on display, and get thousands of dollars from the federal government for the war on drugs.The local cops knew it was no good for they even caught me with a trunk stuffed full of it one time and just took my pocket knife and made me unload it where i got it from. :rofl
I was alot younger then, and had a idea about making hash oil out of it. Never did find out if it would work or not  :lol
Lighten up Francis

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2008, 09:13:52 AM »
$84,000,000 for 35,000 plants, thats $2400 a plant??????? :huh



http://www.wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/3025668/
You don't mean to say that law enforcement would fabricate numbers out of thin air just so they could
a)get harsher punishment for the grower

b)milk more money from the feds

I seem to recall a commercial from the government that told me all the pot sold was funding terrorists. Looks like al queda has invaded North Carolina.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline indy007

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3294
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2008, 09:22:49 AM »
I was alot younger then, and had a idea about making hash oil out of it. Never did find out if it would work or not  :lol

It wouldn't work. Hemp grown for textile use is a different species. Of the 3 major species, 2 get you stoned. Ruderalis, the strain grown for textile use, has so little THC in it, you'd have had to smoke the entire trunk load to get a small buzz.

This actually became a pundit talking point on AM radio here. The guys (whom I generally agree with) started blasting Ron Paul for sponsorsing a bill to allow hemp to be grown for textile products. To them, it was one for the stoners trying to legalize pot. The reality is, they had absolutely no idea what they're talking about and simply don't like RP because he's liberal.

Offline Kaw1000

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1159
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #12 on: June 12, 2008, 09:26:19 AM »
See Rule# 5 on just about every thread!

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #13 on: June 12, 2008, 09:33:54 AM »
they're not even mature yet.
ding ding ding     Many things can go wrong and with farming......never count your chickens......looks like the DEA did count the eggs to see how many chickens they were going to have.



 :noid

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline ROX

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
Re: pot $$$$$
« Reply #14 on: June 12, 2008, 10:10:56 AM »
It's still very early in the year.  Those plans should have been 7' to 8' by late August.

Sadly, a lot of these growers are using state & national parks to grow their weed.

I used to live in NC, and I've seen 'em spot (by helicopter) and bust a perp for just ONE plant.




ROX