« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Superfortress not combat version  (Read 757 times)

Offline pengu146

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72
      • www.357deathdragons.com
Superfortress not combat version
« on: July 16, 2008, 10:10:53 PM »
How about the superfortress. But the resupply version not the bomber version. They were really important to the war effort in the pacific.
Logged

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2008, 10:35:12 PM »
     What version is that exactly?
Logged
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Pannono

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2008, 10:36:36 PM »
2nd B29 thread in 3 days  :lol
Logged
Pannono
Proud Member of Pigs On The Wing
8 Player H2H: 2006-07
MA Tours: 87, 97-113, 143-144, 160-Present
FSO: JG54

Offline Captfish

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 665
      • VF-6 Fighter Sqdn
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2008, 10:41:40 PM »
c-97? made during wwII but didnt fly till post war in '47

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-97_Stratofreighter
Logged
'CO' VF-6 Fighter Sqdn

Hitting trees since tour 78

Offline Rambo Fan

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 182
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2008, 11:30:39 PM »
Quote from: Captfish on July 16, 2008, 10:41:40 PM
c-97? made during wwII but didnt fly till post war in '47

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-97_Stratofreighter
You beat me to it!
Logged

Offline Wolf14

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 858
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2008, 11:40:10 PM »
Everytime I see that plane I cant help but think of the spaceships in the Flash Gordon movie like this one about 1:00 in..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnTHypbLlkE.
Logged

Offline Husky01

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4844
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2008, 11:48:22 PM »
 :)
Logged
BearKats
9GIAP VVS RKKA

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2008, 12:24:59 AM »
So THIS fluffy bunny doesn't carry a carrot? What does it carry then?  :rock
Logged
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2008, 04:33:42 AM »
      The C-97 had a completely different fuselage than the 29.
Logged
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #9 on: July 17, 2008, 06:14:59 AM »
HOLY COW!  Wolf14, you are right on the money!!! 

Quote from: Wolf14 on July 16, 2008, 11:40:10 PM
Everytime I see that plane I cant help but think of the spaceships in the Flash Gordon movie like this one about 1:00 in..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnTHypbLlkE.
Logged
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline pengu146

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72
      • www.357deathdragons.com
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2008, 12:23:35 PM »
I have a book here that says there were completely unarmed versions of B29s used in WWII to resupply fields in china.
Logged

Offline pengu146

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72
      • www.357deathdragons.com
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2008, 05:14:45 PM »
Under closer reading(didnt have reading glasses on) there was a little produced version of the b29 that came before the version thatdropped the NOOOOK!!!
Logged

Offline RAIDER14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2554
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2008, 05:57:39 PM »
find a credible source on the internet instead just your book
Logged

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2008, 09:15:38 PM »
How about a B-32 Dominator? :D

Logged
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Delirium

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7276
Re: Superfortress not combat version
« Reply #14 on: July 25, 2008, 12:14:02 AM »
Quote from: pengu146 on July 17, 2008, 12:23:35 PM
I have a book here that says there were completely unarmed versions of B29s used in WWII to resupply fields in china.

Flying 'The Hump', they used whatever aircraft they could to bring in supplies after the Burma Road got cut off.

They used C47s, C46s, B25s, B29s... whatever they could to bring in supplies.

Does this mean AH needs a B29 when a single formation of bombers can drop FHs?

In a word; negative.
Logged
Delirium
80th "Headhunters"
Retired AH Trainer (but still teach the P38 selectively)

I found an air leak in my inflatable sheep and plugged the hole! Honest!
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »