Author Topic: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?  (Read 644 times)

Offline Mr No Name

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #15 on: July 30, 2008, 03:11:13 PM »
All of the choices we have left suck... I wanted Fred Thompson or Duncan Hunter for Republicans... If I had to choose a democrat, it would be Doug Bernard or Zell Miller

I am voting FOR Bob Barr this November
Vote R.E. Lee '24

Offline OSU

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 205
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #16 on: July 30, 2008, 03:50:28 PM »
Mitt Romney
If I can't win, I die. But if I win, I live. And I can't win if I don't fight.
--Mikasa Ackerman

Offline ROX

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #17 on: July 30, 2008, 04:03:23 PM »
Republicans deserve to be punished for the Bush presidency.

They already did...two years ago.  They voted in Pelosi and a democrat majority and all of us are being punished for it now.




ROX

Offline Mustaine

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4139
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #18 on: July 30, 2008, 04:34:54 PM »
I'm almost certainly going to vote for Obama since the Republicans deserve to be punished for the Bush presidency.

Thats a pretty dumb reason, punish regular citizens for something you disagree with.


Genetically engineered in a lab, and raised by wolverines -- ]V[ E G A D E T ]-[
AoM DFC ZLA BMF and a bunch of other acronyms.

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #19 on: July 30, 2008, 05:51:08 PM »
^^^^^ What he said.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Getback

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6456
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #20 on: July 30, 2008, 05:57:30 PM »
Ron Paul :rock :rock

Ditto, That man makes more sense and actually seems to care about the real problems.

  Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #21 on: July 30, 2008, 07:09:40 PM »
Romney
Gingrich

"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #22 on: July 30, 2008, 07:44:05 PM »
They already did...two years ago.  They voted in Pelosi and a democrat majority and all of us are being punished for it now.

Well the alternative to Bush was a bigger dimwit in both elections... kind of what we have now on both sides; Al Gore who will eventually destroy the world and Kerry that would appease and shuck and jive and throw money around but do nothing of substance... you know kind of like another Clinton.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #23 on: July 30, 2008, 08:24:42 PM »
Thompson....

After that....Smith and Wesson and they all get shown the exit from Washington....Every Senator...congressman....Rep. ..Dem....no matter the party.

flush the whole lot of them and start over.
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #24 on: July 31, 2008, 09:59:23 PM »
"The American public will find it refreshing to finally get a Republican candidate who isn't a moralistic ,sexually repressed, crusading hypocrate Who cruises airport mens rooms late at night"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnYvRGnbjSw

I agree with him on almost everything but abortion. Especially his opinion of McCain zzzzzz.
The ONLY Republican candidate worth a damn


I am speaking of course of






Official Website http://crane4president.com/


« Last Edit: July 31, 2008, 10:03:32 PM by DREDIOCK »
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Denny_Crane!

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
      • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denny_Crane
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #25 on: July 31, 2008, 10:02:49 PM »
"The American public will find it refreshing to finally get a Republican candidate who isn't a moralistic ,sexually repressed, crusading hypocrate. Who cruises airport mens rooms late at night"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnYvRGnbjSw

I agree with him on almost everything but abortion. Especially his opinion of McCain zzzzzz.
The ONLY Republican candidate worth a damn


I am speaking of course of






Official Website http://crane4president.com/

(Image removed from quote.)


Damn right!

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #26 on: July 31, 2008, 10:12:01 PM »
Sitting here I just thought of the perfect title for this election between the Dinousaur has been and Wet behind the ears never was.

This election is a joke. Something more fitting to a really poorly written TV sitcom
And the title.

"The Teaser and the Geezer"
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #27 on: July 31, 2008, 10:37:21 PM »
Sitting here I just thought of the perfect title for this election between the Dinousaur has been and Wet behind the ears never was.

This election is a joke. Something more fitting to a really poorly written TV sitcom
And the title.

"The Teaser and the Geezer"
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Mustaine

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4139
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #28 on: July 31, 2008, 11:02:06 PM »
Thompson....

After that....Smith and Wesson and they all get shown the exit from Washington....Every Senator...congressman....Rep. ..Dem....no matter the party.

flush the whole lot of them and start over.

you spook me sometimes bro how similar we can be :rofl
Genetically engineered in a lab, and raised by wolverines -- ]V[ E G A D E T ]-[
AoM DFC ZLA BMF and a bunch of other acronyms.

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
Re: Who would you have rather had for presidential nominees?
« Reply #29 on: July 31, 2008, 11:10:22 PM »
Spock

Or capt. kirk..or whatever.


Com'on.  :aok
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."