hazzer.. thank you... I guess you can agree with me and then not really want freedom.. it confuses me but...I mean, how can you agree with me on libertarian (individualist in my case) values but disagree with everything else I say? I have no opinions that are not rooted in freedom.lazs
A few million less blue voters is just a silver lining to the cloud..
In my opinion these anti-gun groups are an anti-constitutional organization and that the NRA has the moral right to spy on them.
That is over the line.
The NRA did not violate their constitutional rights. That's laughable. You must be one of those guys with the new, improved, elastic Constitution that stretches to cover any cockamamie idea you happen to be swooning over at the moment.
The right to privacy belongs to individuals, not public organizations.
Maybe you should read the context of the post and one it was a reply too. We happen to have a right to privacy and a right to freedom of speech.NRA uses lobbyist to pander to the govt to protect their own rights, at the same time they are violating others right to "freedom of speech" and "right to privacy" by having a spy in their organization. The NRA had this person in a high position which gives them added benefit on how to lobby the govt to block the anti-gun groups. That is a violation of their rights..
Baloney. As a free citizen I can belong to any public organization I want for any reason I want. They have the right to reject my membership but at the risk of a discrimination suit.
Maybe you should go join the girl scouts then..
If I were gay they'd be afraid not to let me in.