Author Topic: Bf109E-4  (Read 2600 times)

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Bf109E-4
« on: August 22, 2008, 12:45:43 AM »
I've been flying this thing a little bit the past two camps, mostly furballing in it, as I had some pretty decent success in it several months ago.  I really like it.  It's very manouverable but slow and it also has pretty weak guns.

So anyway, I upped one today and got a kill and a couple of assists (I thought I should have had a kill on a Yak but got the assist instead), then saw a set of B-17's.  I took chase because I really wanted to test the Emil's cannons and durability under direct fire.  I approached from dead six with less than 50 cannon rounds left and beat one of the 17's up pretty bad but lost a wing.  I think if I had a full clip and the right approach angle I could have taken out one of the 17's but probably not more than that.

Has anyone else tried going after 17's/24's in the Emil?  How did you do?

 
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline 1pLUs44

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3332
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2008, 01:04:19 AM »
I love going into the DA with it, shooting off all my cannons, and THEN furballing. :rock
No one knows what the future may bring.

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2008, 02:24:52 AM »
You managed to catch a B17 with a 109E? Was he stuck in the mud?  :rofl
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2008, 03:30:51 AM »
MG-FF are modelled as being little better than .50s as far as hitting power goes.  They do maybe 50-60% of the damage a 'normal' 20mm (i.e. Mg-151 or comparable), and maybe 20-30% of a Hizooka.

They also have the ballistics of a watermelon.

Offline mg1942

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2008, 03:57:14 AM »
109E = poorman's Spit 5.

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2008, 04:01:40 AM »
109E = poorman's Spit 5.

the 109E is to compare with spit1/hurri1, the spit5 enemy is the F4.
now posting as SirNuke

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2008, 08:41:42 AM »
"Sheep in wolf's clothing"

Quote by Sodaman's Aircraft Evaluation.


  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2008, 09:51:31 AM »
A while back I took out 3x B17s in a 109E and still had 24 cannon rounds left afterwards. I didn't really have a super great advantage (remember, 109E we're talking about) but I didn't sit in dead 6 tail chases. They seemed to be going slower than full throttle, so I could overtake them a little better.


P.S. Urchin GREATLY exaggerates the weak power of MG/FF. They are one of the weakest 20mm cannons, but still far more powerful than a 50cal round and are explosive so they set fires nicely if they ladn in the right spot.

Offline Monty405

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 234
      • http://www3.sympatico.ca/carol.haynes/
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2008, 01:21:15 AM »
the seem about par with the a6m2's cannons

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2008, 01:21:51 AM »
the seem about par with the a6m2's cannons
It's ironic that you say that, as they're actually exactly based on the same design as the A6M2's cannons.

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2008, 01:50:37 AM »
It's ironic that you say that, as they're actually exactly based on the same design as the A6M2's cannons.

That's odd.  To me the Emil's cannons seem weaker.  I never have problems with the kill shot in the A6M2 but I do in the E-4.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2008, 01:54:41 AM »
"The Type 99 cannon was adapted from the Oerlikon FF by the Imperial Japanese Navy and served as their standard aircraft autocannon during World War II."
Actually, the Type 99 fires a smaller round at a higher velocity than the German MG/FF (which was also based on the Oerlikon FF).
« Last Edit: August 23, 2008, 01:58:11 AM by Motherland »

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2008, 09:40:16 AM »
"The Type 99 cannon was adapted from the Oerlikon FF by the Imperial Japanese Navy and served as their standard aircraft autocannon during World War II."
Actually, the Type 99 fires a smaller round at a higher velocity than the German MG/FF (which was also based on the Oerlikon FF).

That explains it.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2008, 09:51:23 AM »
Give the 110C-4 a try.  It's a lot, lot easier to hit with the low velocity cannon when they're in the nose.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Denniss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: Bf109E-4
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2008, 03:35:46 PM »
The Oerlikon FF (later known as FF-F) used 20x72 cartridges as did the japanese Type 99-1 gun. The japanese Type 99-2 gun was based on the Oerlikon FF-L and both used a 20x101 cartridge. The type 99 guns were probably direct copies or license production of the respective Oerlikon cannons.

The german MG FF was an improved/redesigned version of the FF-F using longer cartridges (20x80). The Bf 109 E-4 used the MF FF/M with the capability to fire the high-capacity explosive Mine shells, those Mine shells were the same projectiles as later used in the MG 151/20 thus the explosive damage of these two should be the same. Only the kinetic energy was lower due to the lower muzzle velocity of the MG FF/M. Bf 109E prior to the E-4 used either 7.92mm machineguns (E-1)  or the older MG FF (E-3) with a standard capacity explosive shell.

BTW - the Hispano 20mm cannon was also based on the Oerlikon FF but on the largest of all three, the FF-S with 20x110 cartridges.