Author Topic: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....  (Read 1847 times)

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #60 on: August 29, 2008, 04:26:34 PM »
You know if you used logic instead of insult to support your position you might get somewhere.

This part was in response to you and not the other but feel free to continue on.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Nwbie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2022
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #61 on: August 29, 2008, 04:29:47 PM »
This part was in response to you and not the other but feel free to continue on.

ooooohhh kkkaaayyy


First...show me the logic in your response

then I'll play your game

Skuzzy-- "Facts are slowly becoming irrelevant in favor of the nutjob."

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #62 on: August 29, 2008, 04:29:53 PM »
Congress should make no laws prohibiting the right to own or bear arms (not a direct quote).

That's the itchy part about law. If you're going to quote it, you're probably best to quote it exactly and not simply your interpretation.
sand

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #63 on: August 29, 2008, 04:58:39 PM »
Or you could quote Heller v DC where all 9 Supremes affirmed the 2nd as an individual right.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #64 on: August 29, 2008, 05:12:56 PM »
Quote
Why is the NRA against handgun laws in chicago?

For the same reason they were/are against handgun laws everywhere.

Quote
Or you could quote Heller v DC where all 9 Supremes affirmed the 2nd as an individual right.
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10169
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #65 on: August 29, 2008, 07:07:18 PM »
That's the itchy part about law. If you're going to quote it, you're probably best to quote it exactly and not simply your interpretation.
well yeah, but still a pretty cool statement :aok
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #66 on: August 29, 2008, 07:15:22 PM »
That's the itchy part about law. If you're going to quote it, you're probably best to quote it exactly and not simply your interpretation.

shall being the important part  :aok
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #67 on: August 29, 2008, 07:21:10 PM »
well yeah, but still a pretty cool statement :aok

LOL. Okay. I'll give you that.
sand

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10169
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #68 on: August 29, 2008, 07:28:43 PM »
LOL. Okay. I'll give you that.
Im not sure why but it reminded me of something Austen Powers would say.......

Allow myself to introduce.....(vacant pause), myself  :aok
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline pluck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1302
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #69 on: August 29, 2008, 07:54:16 PM »
ah yes election year, the time has come to wade though tons and tons of bs, watch politians sell out babies and sometimes there own families for ratings, or to show their "sensitive" side or how they embrace "family values."  (as if the other guy doesn't have any values).  I'm undecided as of yet, but at least this year we have something slightly new to watch...  a new guy with old guy, and an old guy with a new girl. 
« Last Edit: August 29, 2008, 07:56:38 PM by pluck »
-Vast
NOSEART
80th FS "Headhunters"

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #70 on: August 29, 2008, 08:32:13 PM »
Headlines in today's paper:  GDP up by 3.2% during the last fiscal year.

Doesn't sound like a depression to me. 



The speech was well delivered....but the same old same old.  New programs to help out those in need.  Soak the rich....tax cuts to the middle class (Clinton promised them too....then reneged after he was elected.) 

Love the misquotes

Actually what he said was to close coorperate loopholes in the tax system. Not always a good thing but Not always a bad thing either.
And giving subsidies to those who could just as easily afford it themselves Doesnt always make a ton of sense either.Unless of course your a stockholder in one of those companies.

But one thing the right always touts and I totally agree with. Is people being able to do for themselves and not count on a government handout.
But to be fair that should also hold true for the very rich and corporations as well.
Personally
I'd rather see subsidies go to the up and comming, the future. rather then the already established.

And he claimed tax cuts for 95% of working families while cutting programs that dont work (regardless of the administration there certainly seems to be enough of these)

C'mon man even 95% of Fox News is saying it wasnt the same old same old kind of speech.
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #71 on: August 29, 2008, 08:54:32 PM »
From Obama's Denver Speech:
Quote
...John McCain likes to say that he'll follow bin Laden to the Gates of Hell - but he won't even go to the cave where he lives.

What's that supposed to mean?

Does it mean that Obama would go have a glass of goat milk with bin Laden and talk about life in his cave home and McCain wouldn't?

Or is he implying that McCain would not take out bin Laden if he in fact knew where he was (like Clinton)?

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #72 on: August 29, 2008, 10:16:57 PM »
dred..  that is really admirable that you are a man who is not swayed by..  uh.. the way a politician votes and who he has as mentors and the things he has said in the past.

It is the greatest of thinkers like yourself who can ignore all that and go by what they say in their final scripted speeches.

lazs

dont know if I said it in this thread or another.

"What he says and what he does may be entirely two different things"

and " am am not going to base my decision on only a few issues. Particularly not the two that arent likely to change much anyway (guns and abortion)
But rather the whole package"

Your making like I am ready to run out and vote for him. Im not ready to run out and vote for anyone.
McCains voting record is less then stellar as well about issues that do matter.
A few examples

Voted against Lobbying and Donation Regulations. a bill that increases regulations on members of Congress regarding lobbyists and donations
whch included but are not exlusive to..
Requiring candidate committees, leadership PAC's, and political party committees to disclose bundled contributions by a lobbyist totaling over $15,000 within a six-month period.[Title II (Sec. 204)].

Prohibits any member of Congress from participating in the Civil Service Retirement System if convicted of bribery, fraud, perjury, corruption, conspiracy or other related offenses.[Title IV (Sec. 401 [a])].
Requires that Senators who submit earmark requests on a bill or committee report be identified as the sponsor of their requests on a publicly accessible congressional website at least 48 hours before the item comes to a vote [Tile V (Sec. 521)].

Vote to adopt an amendment that creates a special committee to investigate the awarding of contracts in Afghanistan and Iraq taking into consideration: bidding, methods of contracting, subcontracting, oversight procedures, allegations of wasteful practices, accountability and lessons learned in Afghanistan and Iraq
 
Voted against
Price-Gouging During Emergencies Amendment
Vote on a motion to waive the Budget Act in order to adopt an amendment that makes it illegal to sell crude oil, gasoline, or petroleum distillates at a price that is excessive or takes unfair advantage during a declared state of emergency.
 
Voted against
Corporate Financing of Terrorism Amendment
Vote to adopt an amendment that makes U.S. businesses and their subsidiaries liable to prosecution for dealing with foreign businesses which have links to terrorism or whose parent country supports terrorism.

And one that really burns my butt
Voted NO
Denying Legal Status for Immigrants Convicted of Certain Crimes
Vote to pass an amendment that would prohibit undocumented immigrants convicted of aggravated felonies, domestic violence, stalking, violation of protection orders, crimes against children, or crimes relating to the illegal purchase or sale of firearms, from gaining legal status.

As I said in another post. Each side has plus's and minus's.
The second amendment is a plus for me. yes. but with all due respect. unlike you it is not everything. Particularly when its not likely to go anywhere even with him in office. I remember more then 30 years ago watching All in the Family and Archie arguing with Gloria over guns that classic line "would it make you any happier little goyl if they was thrown out of windas?" That was more then 30 years ago. And in spite of just a few administration changes. I'm still hearing the same arguments.
And 30+ years from now I'll probably still be hearing the same arguments.
So many things have to happen just right for the second to be significantly changed that its highly unlikely it will.
Instead it will go back and forth like it always does
Even the appointment of SC Judges is no small feat.
Look at it this way.
Since and including the time Carter first took office. The Republicans have had Their president in office 20 of the last 32 years.
And for all their "Pro life" rhetoric. They STILL havent gotten Roe V Wade overturned.
And Im supposed to beleive that Obama is going to suddenly wave a magic wand and get all the necessary people that would needed on board make gun rights go away?
And what would he do that the next Republican pres wouldnt undo? (That assault weapon ban really stuck now didnt it?)

C'mon dude. Your much brighter then that. I know. I've seen it.

With that in mind Im not basing my decision on 1 or two or even three issues alone.

As for voting records. Each votes almost strictly along party lines. Big whoop.
Obama 96%.
Contrary to popular beleif. McCain is hardly a rebel. In the current congress he has voted along party lines 88.3% of the time. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000303/
thats what? a whole 7.7% difference?? Wowww
WOOOooo. Real rebel.
If that makes him a rebel. then the fact that I eat meat 85% of the time means Im a vegetarian.
Drop that number down to 70% and I'll be impressed.

By the same token. Obama is no winner either.
I could list his things as as well. But Im not trying to take part in this mutual admiration society. And I'd just be feeding the resident rah rah club.

I am trying to look at it all in an unbiased manner
2nd amendment and abortion aside
Each has taken positions I do not like on some things. And do agree with on others.
So far I still dont think either of them is the lessor of all evils.

I may just "waste" my vote on an independent out of pure disgust.

Finally. My comments were made specifically on what he said in his speech. Which was what my comments were all about. The speech.


Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #73 on: August 29, 2008, 10:26:27 PM »
Charon and Laz.

You two seemingly being obsessed with the second.
Seems to be your primary reason for voting.
And you have also made mention of being "pro life"
I have a question for you.

The hitch is. No inbetween answers, no "I wouldnt vote"
The only legitimate answer can be one. or the other.

If you were faced with two candidates. and ONLY two.
and you had to vote for one or the other.

Candidate 1
If he gets elected you will haveyour gun rights just as you see they should be. And they would be that way always and forever
The flipside to this is Abortion would be always and forever legal

Candidate 2 If he gets elected. Abortion would be completely outlawed. Again. always and forever.
But. So would gun ownership. always and forever.

Which of the two would you vote for?
Just how important are guns for you?
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline SuBWaYCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: The Annoited One's Acceptance Speech....
« Reply #74 on: August 29, 2008, 11:07:14 PM »
Big  :salute to Drediock for making good points in this thread.

You said everything i would have.
Axis C.O. for Battle of the Dnieper, Winter '43

Air superiority is a condition for all operations, at sea, on land, and in the air. - Air Marshal Arthur Tedder

364th Chawks