Author Topic: AMD or INTEL?  (Read 835 times)

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
Re: AMD or INTEL?
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2008, 07:40:36 PM »
Intel.  Any CPU in the Wolfdale line.  They run cooler and faster than anything comparable from AMD.  If you like to overclock, they are a dream to work with.
I have so many fans on the AMD to keep it cool, it can be heard from across the house. When I run AH, cpu usually in mid  40 Centigrades, AFTER I pull cover off, mebbe I'll give Intel a try, been doing AMD for most the last decade
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Re: AMD or INTEL?
« Reply #16 on: September 05, 2008, 10:18:15 PM »
 My 3.2Mhz (slightly overclocked to 3.4Mhz) AMD x2 runs 33-40 degrees playing AH.

Of course I do get shot down alot. Probably runs cooler because of the amount of time I spend in a 'chute! Actually I give credit to my Antec 900. Probably one of the cooler running mid-sized cases out there.

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: AMD or INTEL?
« Reply #17 on: September 05, 2008, 10:35:16 PM »
You can get a lot of cpu power for under $300... I think the sweet spot is around $250 for an intel cpu, 2 cores running somewhere around 3ghz.  Of course, if I was going to buy today I'd be getting the new 3.0 ghz quad core Q9550, an ASUS P5Q Deluxe (or some sort of P5Q), and 2x2GB DDR2.  Top it off with an Nvidia GTX 260 and there's your system refresh for the next 3 years.

I priced all that out at newegg today and it's just a tick over $900.

But yea, Intel is king this tech refresh cycle.  I went with AMD last time because I couldn't stand the Pentium 4 but AMD has stagnated and after they abandoned socket 939, I have no incentive to put more money into a second-rate cpu.  If there was a nice fast socket 939 cpu I could get a nice jump in speed without replacing everything else but as long as I'm going to have to replace the mobo anyhow, I might as well go with Intel since it's faster and the underlying technology is somewhat better.  AMD has some good tech but the fact is that Intel is faster and consistently more upgradable.  AMD abandoned their premium socket during a minor tech refresh cycle, while Intel has been using the same socket for years with HUGE speed increases.  Buying AMD now is just dumb, unless you're REALLY on a tight budget and then in that case, I think AMD is a bit cheaper for a low-end system.


Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Re: AMD or INTEL?
« Reply #18 on: September 06, 2008, 12:04:44 AM »
 I think a comparible AMDx2 system could be built considerably cheaper than a Intel x2 system. However; by 2010 dual's will be like single cores today. Old, outdated and good for basic computing/casual gaming only.

Quad; definatly Intel. AMD's triple core is just silly. AMD quad's may be real quads but they perform slower in nearly every test.   
 
 

Offline ZULU6

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
      • http://www.hdforums.com/
Re: AMD or INTEL?
« Reply #19 on: September 09, 2008, 10:19:15 AM »
INTEL!!! :rock
ZULU6
"Get close .. when he fills the entire windscreen ... then you can't possibly miss." Erich Hartmann 352 Kills-Gruppenkommandeur Jagdgeschwader 52 Knight's Cross to the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves, Swords and Diamonds