This is where you go wrong. If, I tell you I was robbed, and you call bs. My lack of proof to assure you it happened will never change the fact that it did, indeed, happen. You could continue to debunk my claim and win a debate on the fact that I didn't have proof, but it still happened, nonetheless.
Bush, was alive through all of the CLinton era attacks on us, he and all of the people around him knew Binladins name and his intentions. He had 9 months to do something, he failed.
No, I didn't go wrong. The problem with your assertion is that you believe something happened, and yet provide no evidence, saying you don't HAVE to.
Again, expecting Bush to stop the events of 11 September 2001 in EIGHT MONTHS when in fact there is plenty of evidence that it was in the planning stages for at least 2-3 YEARS is ludicrous. On 20 January 2001, Bush inherited, from a less than co-operative Clinton administration, a spec ops and intelligence system that was in complete disarray. The spec ops units had been hamstrung, and prevented from operating freely. The intelligence system was a train wreck, the human assets had been cut to the point where they couldn't gather adequate information. That section of the government was performing so badly that we'd been attacked successfully numerous times. It took eight YEARS for it to get that bad, and you expect it to have been fully repaired and functioning at 100% in eight MONTHS? Get real.
