Author Topic: Fairness Doctrine?  (Read 830 times)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Re: Fairness Doctrine?
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2008, 03:46:14 PM »

yadda yadda... dirka dirka

 

I could care less if liberal talk radio exists or not. All I said was that things were better when we had the fairness doctrine. There were radio talk shows before Rush, believe it or not. The doctrine never called for "equal time". Don't you think the American people deserve accuracy from the media using the airwaves CONTROLLED by our government?


Offline sluggish

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2474
Re: Fairness Doctrine?
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2008, 03:51:45 PM »
I could care less if liberal talk radio exists or not. All I said was that things were better when we had the fairness doctrine. There were radio talk shows before Rush, believe it or not. The doctrine never called for "equal time". Don't you think the American people deserve accuracy from the media using the airwaves CONTROLLED by our government?



Do you think the new version of the "fairness" doctrine is designed to ensure that liberal talk radio exists or to ensure that right-wing talk radio is squelched?  As an American would you stand up for the right of Rush to be a blubbering idiot?
« Last Edit: September 22, 2008, 04:02:27 PM by sluggish »

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
Re: Fairness Doctrine?
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2008, 03:57:06 PM »
I could care less if liberal talk radio exists or not. All I said was that things were better when we had the fairness doctrine. There were radio talk shows before Rush, believe it or not. The doctrine never called for "equal time". Don't you think the American people deserve accuracy from the media using the airwaves CONTROLLED by our government?



Do you actually think or believe the "Fairness Doctrine" will actually ensure, or for that matter even promote media accuracy? Really? :lol Honestly? :D Seriously? :rofl
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Re: Fairness Doctrine?
« Reply #33 on: September 22, 2008, 03:59:55 PM »
It will certainly improve on the current divisive brand of reporting.

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Re: Fairness Doctrine?
« Reply #34 on: September 22, 2008, 04:04:18 PM »
It will certainly improve on the current divisive brand of reporting.

Dream on.

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
Re: Fairness Doctrine?
« Reply #35 on: September 22, 2008, 04:05:00 PM »
Palin thinks the book, Valis, is neat. :O

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Re: Fairness Doctrine?
« Reply #36 on: September 22, 2008, 04:11:45 PM »

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Re: Fairness Doctrine?
« Reply #37 on: September 23, 2008, 09:00:07 AM »
MT.. you do not think that it will improve the "divisive brand of reporting"  you are for bringing us all together like osamabama wants to "bring us all together"  once we are forced to do it his way..we will be all together..

It is the typical liberal democrat way of bringing us all together..  all our students are brought together by having only one school system run by liberals.

I like a divisive media..  I would kill to get a more divisive media on the TV.. not less...  I want to hear both sides not CNN's side and MSNBC's side and every other side save Fox that is exactly the same liberal drivel.

You don't want fairness.. you want a muzzle.

lazs

Offline sluggish

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2474
Re: Fairness Doctrine?
« Reply #38 on: September 23, 2008, 09:16:12 AM »
MT.. you do not think that it will improve the "divisive brand of reporting"  you are for bringing us all together like osamabama wants to "bring us all together"  once we are forced to do it his way..we will be all together..

It is the typical liberal democrat way of bringing us all together..  all our students are brought together by having only one school system run by liberals.

I like a divisive media..  I would kill to get a more divisive media on the TV.. not less...  I want to hear both sides not CNN's side and MSNBC's side and every other side save Fox that is exactly the same liberal drivel.

You don't want fairness.. you want a muzzle.

lazs

"The true intention of the sincere man is to erect his beliefs into law."

I once got called out by some dude who used to post in here for making such a deep statement that I in no way could possibly understand.