Bail out foreign banks!

[alskahawk]

 Now Treasury Secretary Paulsen wants to bail out foreign banks in addition to the numerous American financial institutions.
 This is a guy who two weeks ago said; The economy is fine.
                                      3 weeks ago;  The economy is fine.

 

 11.3 Trillion deficit. 700 billion dollar blank check, no oversight and we have to hurry and do it now?  Starting to sound a lot like that urgent run up to the Iraq war.       

[bustr]

I see you learned journalism form the MSM Media. If you had been honest and linked the story readers would have seen the below which is as reasonable as granting the Gitmo detaines Habius Corpus by the SCOTUS. American units is the issue. They operate on american soil and pay their version of american corporate taxes.

Foreign banks, which were initially excluded from the plan, lobbied successfully over the weekend to be able to sell the toxic U.S. mortgage debt owned by their ""American units"" to the Treasury, getting the same treatment as United States banks.

Some of this blogs members blog here like they pick, HO and run in the MA.

[alskahawk]

I see you learned journalism form the MSM Media. If you had been honest and linked the story readers would have seen the below which is as reasonable as granting the Gitmo detaines Habius Corpus by the SCOTUS. American units is the issue. They operate on american soil and pay their version of american corporate taxes.

Foreign banks, which were initially excluded from the plan, lobbied successfully over the weekend to be able to sell the toxic U.S. mortgage debt owned by their ""American units"" to the Treasury, getting the same treatment as United States banks.

.Some of this blogs members blog here like they pick, HO and run in the MA

 I heard a piece on the news tonight about it. It angered me. As for MSM. Don't know what your on about there. Never heard of MSM. MSN maybe? Now Foreign banks are in the plan? So that's a good thing? What does Gitmo have to do with it? Habius Corpus? (misspelled Habeas?)

If your would have been honest you would have posted the Secretary's interview. Which was what I heard. He said nothing about Gitmo. It was about bailing out foreign banks. Period.

Journalism?  My English may not be perfect but I hope I can construct a better sentence than ".Some of this blogs members blog here like they pick, HO and run in MA"

[MORAY37]

I see you learned journalism form the MSM Media. If you had been honest and linked the story readers would have seen the below which is as reasonable as granting the Gitmo detaines Habius Corpus by the SCOTUS.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights. . ."

"Certain inalienable rights".....  Applies not only to americans, sir, no matter how much you think it should only. Habeas Corpus was good enough to try Nazi war criminals, and to punish them.... it would do fine in this case. You might think it was reasonable too, if you were one of the 75% of detainees at Gitmo that were turned in by your neighbor, falsely, in Iraq for the 50$ reward, becuase the neighbor just didn't like you..or just needed to eat that week.  Now you sit in a jail, only on the word of someone else's accusation ONLY.  Surely, even you realize this is wrong. At some point you will be OUTRAGED, whence at some future date, some of these detainees successfully sue for damages for unlawful incarceration.  It will happen.... and you will say it's the "fall of justice".  The point remains, at no time, in our great country, is the word of one man without evidence, enough to take any man's freedom.

habeas corpus
In law, a writ directed to someone who has custody of a person, ordering him or her to bring the person before the court issuing the writ and to justify why the person is detained in custody.