Author Topic: Gun recoil for Schlowy  (Read 3320 times)

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #15 on: October 02, 2008, 03:18:04 PM »
Warming up for the weekend lock-down/PNG, are we?
Certainly not. I am trying to educate the poor soul on how much detail HTC has incorporated into this game.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2008, 03:32:49 PM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline dedalos

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8052
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #16 on: October 02, 2008, 04:36:53 PM »
How can anyone who spells as bad as HiTech type in coad like that and actually get it to work?



Did you see how he spelled everything?  That was supposed to be sudo coad written in plain English 
Quote from: 2bighorn on December 15, 2010 at 03:46:18 PM
Dedalos pretty much ruined DA.

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #17 on: October 02, 2008, 04:38:27 PM »
A code fragment that supposedly is not in the game.


if(!(HardPnt->OwnerFlags & waOF_FILM_LAUNCH))
{
Weapon->BulletCasing = HardPnt->BulletCasing;
Weapon->HardPntFlags = HardPnt->GroupFlags;
}

Weapon->FirstUpdateTimeInc = 0;
if(Clk->dblTime - HardPnt->ReleaseTime  >= 0.00001)
{
Weapon->FirstUpdateTimeInc = Clk->dblTime - HardPnt->ReleaseTime;
}
if(Weapon->WeaponClass->Procs->Launch != NULL)
{
Rtn = Weapon->WeaponClass->Procs->Launch(Weapon,HardPnt,Clk);
}

/*
** Calc the energy for the wepone recoil
*/
HardPnt->LaunchForceSum += Weapon->WeaponClass->SimParams.ProjectileWeight *
Weapon->WeaponClass->SimParams.InitialSpeed * madOOGRAVITY;

 :confused:

I bent my wookie.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #18 on: October 02, 2008, 04:41:20 PM »
:confused:

I bent my wookie.
Was it ever straight?  :noid
See Rule #4

Offline Schlowy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #19 on: October 02, 2008, 05:50:50 PM »
All yall stepped in it this time!

-------------------------------------------
You could have used brakes to affect that stuff Bronk...  :huh
And btw, educate me? You couldn't tell me ****.
You've been the one getting educated, so sthu! :aok <-thats my middle finger poking up!
-------------------------------------------
Stodd, don't make me post the film of shooting  you down with my 190a5 (with 25fuel and no outer cannons) and 2 other planes too at fiter town... "Schlowy3 landed 3 victories" while you were still hollaring 'you sux!'...
I did NOT give you permission to laugh at me!  :P
--------------------------------------------

Hitech, I couldn't understand a sentence you typed... go calm down, sober up, and come back in a few hours!  :D














The above statement is an example of how some of the "3000posts(or more) Allied Fliers" treat us "50posts(or less) Innocent Luft Folk" - flame it up! At least I didn't do you like Glock89 would have and put 101 of the " :D "
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl. Learn how 2 spell.
RoC by the way.
So, Hitech, just kidding, I'll assume your not upset, not drunk, and not retarded, etc, etc, etc...
That being said, bias or sources is my question.

-The current topic:
 "Why I wondered if firing amo slowed planes"
A 190 getting chased, both planes at co-E, it seems 190 acceleration IS MUCH LESS THAN most other planes acceleration EVEN WHEN the trailing plane is SPRAYING AMO!
-The current conclusion:
**AH 190's sux worse than I thought**
(My NEW opinion of AH 190s) = (My  old opinion of AH 190s) - (the force induced by firing amo!)
Countless times, some piece of garbage junk on my 6, firing away, and still gaining, from Co-E.

-The Actual Issue:
Amo slowing planes down DOES seem like an insignificant amount, so maybe its more this:
Some say "They're cutting your corners":
The roll and cut penalty to speed is severe to 190s.
I do the 'reasonable force' method when attempting to out run (rather that try to slow and force overshoot): I roll and cut to be enough out of the direct path of the trailing bogey, which also corrects its course. End result usually is that he is only closer than before. My guess is that 190's get severe penalties for pulling back on the stick at all.

"Roll rate" in one hand and "severe penalty to 'instantaneous turning'" in other hand, results in a doomed 190. Our 190 goes from slight pull back to viscious stall, skipping the part of 'excellent instantaneous.'

As I see it, AH2 = AW5, so we can't totally discard this ole book:
From AW2 manual separate purchase manual, "Air Warrior II Stratagies and Secrets" page 154:

The Fock Wulf 190A8 is the fastest of all planes in the European Theatre of Operations (ETO) (behind the P-51, P47, and P-38 at some altitudes). It does compress a bit at verh high speeds. The Focke Wulf 190A8's instantaneous turn rate is excellent, but its sustained turn rate is of extremely short duration. It has the highest roll response of all. On the other hand it climbs poorly, and doesn't work well at high altitude either. Its acceleration is good, but its E retention is poor. Th eFocke Wulf 190A8's armament is heavy. The cannon is retained through 80 percent of its firing duration, losing 2 at the 50 percent mark which is as leathal as a fresh Spitfire at this point, and repains so up till only 20 percent is left, where only the two machine guns remain. At 100 percent it's 75 percent more lethal than a Spitfire."

There is a 2nd paragraph
It does say about 190A* having 'great armor and great durability,' and a 'vicious stall which tends to invert but easily recovered.' Hence I wondered why my 190s were losing Ailerons everytime!
*Seems our 190s is downgraded!*

Seems the 190's turn rates are not only less, but they take more E also than in the ole days of AW3
I put a big post about how to fly AW3 190s when bogies were chasing:

(I put a follow-up post, wondering about does amo slow the trailing firing planes down... which is how we got to this thread)

Otherwise, Hitech, Sir, besides my bad opinion of the modeling... <Salute> thanks for the awesome game!

190s
Fix 190s pls instantaneous turn rate pls!
Fix 190s 20mm's pls. How bout that 190a8 amo rating from the AW2 book? I tend to have to slow down too much to saddle when in me 190d9.

109s
No comment about the crimes against the 109s!
Ok 1 comment! Ya know, it did have two radiators would be nice if the damage screen had two also!
Inferior Spits, their copying started with the fuel injection, and finally caught up with two radiators in the late models, so maybe they get two also but only in the late model!
Btw, i you're having trouble counting, I highly recommend Sesame Street show!  :D
« Last Edit: October 02, 2008, 05:58:13 PM by Schlowy »
if the BoB is proof the spitty was better, then the Battle of Dieppe is proof the 109 was better.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dieppe_Raid
Shane said in game 'oh the nazi kid' referring to me...
Lynx got in it saying 'yawn' and then calling me 'tw@' again...
I got chat

Offline Stang

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6127
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #20 on: October 02, 2008, 05:55:50 PM »
LOL AW flight models are relevant? 

Maybe to you since the 109F4 there climbed at like 6,000ft/min.

 :lol

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #21 on: October 02, 2008, 06:05:02 PM »
All yall stepped in it this time!

-------------------------------------------
You could have used brakes to affect that stuff Bronk...  :huh

http://www.mediafire.com/?ytynigmthnn

More witchcraft.
 :noid


Edit: how did i get it rolling backwards if the rpm and map did not move?  I didn't know brakes had a reverse function. :rofl :rofl :rofl
« Last Edit: October 02, 2008, 06:40:01 PM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #22 on: October 02, 2008, 06:10:36 PM »
Heretics! Burn them all!
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline Schlowy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #23 on: October 02, 2008, 06:24:10 PM »
LOL AW flight models are relevant? 

Maybe to you since the 109F4 there climbed at like 6,000ft/min.

 :lol

Stang, look man, everyone claimed all this and all that back when, reality! Some of the data may have even been copy/pasted... the game 'Engine' is obviosly new but who knows, end result is were still shooting at c47's paratroopers ya know...
Wikipedia the stuff, some AH guys broke off directly from the old AW team yes?
(I did enuf typying today, you source it!)
Repeat your line in some 11+ years when were playing AH5?
(AW2 book is from 1997, I've no idea when AW1 came out)

About the 109F:
Yeah, 109F's back when... if ya could loop it 3 times, ya win the fight! I still bet peeps like AH's 109F's more than AW3's!
« Last Edit: October 02, 2008, 06:34:30 PM by Schlowy »
if the BoB is proof the spitty was better, then the Battle of Dieppe is proof the 109 was better.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dieppe_Raid
Shane said in game 'oh the nazi kid' referring to me...
Lynx got in it saying 'yawn' and then calling me 'tw@' again...
I got chat

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #24 on: October 02, 2008, 06:27:13 PM »
What no comment on my new film? I can't wait for you to splain this one. :rofl
See Rule #4

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #25 on: October 02, 2008, 06:38:53 PM »
Stang, look man, everyone claimed all this and all that back when, reality! Some of the data may have even been copy/pasted... the game 'Engine' is obviosly new but who knows, end result is were still shooting at c47's paratroopers ya know...
Wikipedia the stuff, some AH guys broke off directly from the old AW team yes?
(I did enuf typying today, you source it!)
Repeat your line in some 11+ years when were playing AH5?
(AW2 book is from 1997, I've no idea when AW1 came out)

About the 109F:
Yeah, 109F's back when... if ya could loop it 3 times, ya win the fight! I still bet peeps like AH's 109F's more than AW3's!


Stang is right, the modeling in AW has no bearing on the way aircraft are modeled in AH and no, no one that developed AH worked on AW, though they were players at one time.

The fact is, you have failed miserably to show how the bf 109 or the FW 190 is incorrectly modeled in AH and using AW's plane modeling as evidence it moronic at best, especially considering how porked the AW flight model was.  AW modeled the P-38J with dive brakes, yeah really accurate modeling *rolls eyes*.

Face it, your a loon operating on half a cylinder.  I suspect though you won't be here very long, especially after calling HiTech a drunk and a retard. 


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #26 on: October 02, 2008, 06:43:24 PM »
Stang is right, the modeling in AW has no bearing on the way aircraft are modeled in AH and no, no one that developed AH worked on AW, though they were players at one time.

The fact is, you have failed miserably to show how the bf 109 or the FW 190 is incorrectly modeled in AH and using AW's plane modeling as evidence it moronic at best, especially considering how porked the AW flight model was.  AW modeled the P-38J with dive brakes, yeah really accurate modeling *rolls eyes*.

Face it, your a loon operating on half a cylinder.  I suspect though you won't be here very long, especially after calling HiTech a drunk and a retard. 


ack-ack
He can't disprove AH recoil modeling. You expect him to prove 109/190 FM flaws?
« Last Edit: October 02, 2008, 06:50:00 PM by Bronk »
See Rule #4

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #27 on: October 02, 2008, 06:49:20 PM »
You expect him to prove 109/190 FM flaws.

Nope, don't expect he will or can. I just like reading his delusional tirades about how England has engaged in covert activities to paint the Luftwaffe planes in a negative light to ensure England's national security and standing in the world.

I guess since the Krusty B.S. Meter is now an official recognized measuring standard in Bull Scatology ratings, I give Schowy's posts a Krusty B.S. rating of 99.99.


ack-ack
« Last Edit: October 02, 2008, 06:51:37 PM by Ack-Ack »
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Murdr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5608
      • http://479th.jasminemaire.com
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #28 on: October 02, 2008, 07:07:19 PM »
As I replied in the other thread, recoil force is modeled in AH.  If I had been asked to support that statment, I could have easily produced about 3 or 4 threads where HiTech had already indicated this, or told you how to observe its effects on speed in flight.

I'll offer a little advise (though I'm not sure why since the last time I tried, the advise was ignored and you were subsequently banned from the board for not taking the advise).  Do real tests, produce real documentation if you feel is something modeled in AH needs modified.  You claimed to do speed/recoil effects testing in the other thread, and we come to find out your tests were anticdotal from arena play.  The reasonable assumption is that all the other assertions are also garbage or ill informed.

If I wanted to talk about the FW190A8, I could cite it's clean power on stall speed is 113 mph @ 25% fuel @ sea level.  It's sustained turn radius and rate are 931 feet and 16.1dps.  Its peak instantanious turn rate is 26.9dps at 277mph.  The Dora is actually better with an I-RoT at 27.5dps at 271mph.  But the best 190 in turn performance is the A5 with an I-RoT of  30.7 at 242 as modeled in AH.  That would be an example of real test data as opposed to talking out ones backside.

Post counts and planes flown for score do not equal credibility.  Providing reliable solid information, and acting civil equals credibility.  Some people with much higher post counts than mine can't seem to behave in an acceptable manner on these boards without being banned on a periodic basis. 

Offline Schlowy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: Gun recoil for Schlowy
« Reply #29 on: October 02, 2008, 07:19:30 PM »
Bronk, what do you want me to do? Guess what you posted?
My guess is you put viruses to cause me plane to blow up at random intervals and the other dl makes me bail out?

Hightech posted that firing amo slowed us... I believe it now, even though my test didnt' show it, my test was flawed, maybe it would show if I totally zoomed in on the speed gauge. Satisfied?
-------------------------------------------------------------

Stang is right, the modeling in AW has no bearing on the way aircraft are modeled in AH and no, no one that developed AH worked on AW, though they were players at one time.

The fact is, you have failed miserably to show how the bf 109 or the FW 190 is incorrectly modeled in AH and using AW's plane modeling as evidence it moronic at best, especially considering how porked the AW flight model was.  AW modeled the P-38J with dive brakes, yeah really accurate modeling *rolls eyes*.

Face it, your a loon operating on half a cylinder.  I suspect though you won't be here very long, especially after calling HiTech a drunk and a retard. 


ack-ack
AckAck, let me hear you say it then.... come on, you can do it...
Say "Air Warrior III modeling was completely fantasy"
You practically did anyways...
Assuming you did, then the same thing could be said about here! (in 12 years!)
I think that you are confusing 'game modeling' and 'game engine'... or are you saying both were fantasy?
You sound like a kid anyways, 'my game is realistic, your game isn't'...

----------------------------------------------

Hitech, do you think I called you a drunk or a retard? I've said some things in the past, old acct even more, 'AddinkshighII' for example... so sorry, thought I was getting a 2nd chance here! Probation expired! :)
Posters like AckAck are a reason why your message bords are disfunctional and seemingly not a place for serious discussion. Posters just like him are what led to me disrespecting this place and getting banned from the boards last time anyways.  He has 9000+ posts like the falitical post above... shame on you Hitech!

He calls me a loon... look at his Icon 
(May I be permitted to 'pull a glock89?'...)
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl  :rofl :rofl :rofl

Yes, I'm having waaay to much fun!  :D
if the BoB is proof the spitty was better, then the Battle of Dieppe is proof the 109 was better.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dieppe_Raid
Shane said in game 'oh the nazi kid' referring to me...
Lynx got in it saying 'yawn' and then calling me 'tw@' again...
I got chat