Author Topic: ANY early war bomber  (Read 843 times)

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
ANY early war bomber
« on: October 08, 2008, 12:15:34 PM »
I don't care what it is.

Getting outrun by Boston's in a 109E irked me in the BoB Scenario on Sunday.

We need any early war bomber to be a useful substitute for the bombers which took part in the early war campaigns.

...and yes, before any of the He-111 crowd comes in, i am suggesting that as one option.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline bongaroo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1822
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2008, 12:25:15 PM »
Agreed!  I'd like to add that I'd prefer a bomber that wasn't an allied job.   :aok
Callsign: Bongaroo
Formerly: 420ace


Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2008, 12:27:53 PM »
B-25C is a better sub as an early war aircraft IMO, don't know why that isn't used more in scenarios.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2008, 12:37:20 PM »

Getting outrun by Boston's in a 109E irked me in the BoB Scenario on Sunday.

That made me laugh.  Thanks for the humor.   :lol

I agree, if there are early war bombers that need to be substituted... the Boston is the fastest of the early war bunch is isnt the most typical of early war bombers.  I too suggest one of the B25 or even one of the larger bombers but limit the payload (100 or 250lb bombs) and limit defense to a certain turret or two only based on the bomber they are substituting for.  It shouldnt be too difficult.

There are lots of buffs that could be added... I think Germany had one called the He-111.  The Brits had the Wellington, iirc.
 
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline apcampbell

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 244
      • http://
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2008, 01:10:49 PM »
Definately. He 111, Vickers Wellington, Mitsubishi G4M, and Tupolev SB2 would be great in rounding out the EW bomber set
"Navy061"
http://www.slybirds.com
Flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2008, 08:49:16 PM »
Ju-52.. both as a transport and a light bomber. I'm not sure if the bomber version ever served in WW2, but I know it was in the Spanish Civil War. Answers your wish, a new transport, and AvA setups.

  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2008, 09:49:33 PM »
Definately. He 111, Vickers Wellington, Mitsubishi G4M, and Tupolev SB2 would be great in rounding out the EW bomber set
Do-17 Sm-81 would be great to have.
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2008, 09:57:25 PM »
Wellington B.Mk III should also be added to the short list.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline vonKrimm

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2008, 08:04:09 AM »
That made me laugh.  Thanks for the humor.   :lol

I agree, if there are early war bombers that need to be substituted... the Boston is the fastest of the early war bunch is isnt the most typical of early war bombers.  I too suggest one of the B25 or even one of the larger bombers but limit the payload (100 or 250lb bombs) and limit defense to a certain turret or two only based on the bomber they are substituting for.  It shouldnt be too difficult.

There are lots of buffs that could be added... I think Germany had one called the He-111.  The Brits had the Wellington, iirc.
 

Just make 'em use Lancs; running just two engines.  :D


Fight Like a Girl

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2008, 08:14:36 AM »
I would welcome a he11, wellington, g4m or a sm79
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline RMrider

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
      • http://
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #10 on: October 09, 2008, 10:01:45 AM »
Ju-52.. both as a transport and a light bomber. I'm not sure if the bomber version ever served in WW2, but I know it was in the Spanish Civil War. Answers your wish, a new transport, and AvA setups.

I am pretty sure it was used, but dont quote me on this.
MDStampf - JG11 'Sonderstaffel'
Sgt Stampfli, USMC


Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #11 on: October 09, 2008, 10:35:25 AM »
I too would like to see an early-war bomber, however I think we need one more perked bomber before any others are added.

The reason for this is primarily that at the moment, our only perked bomber is the Ar-234, which is fun to fly every now and then, however it's usefulness is quite limited.  This is why I support adding next the A-26 Invader as a perked bomber, and then any early-war aeroplane to help out in scenarios.

Yossarian
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #12 on: October 09, 2008, 10:47:55 AM »
I too would like to see an early-war bomber, however I think we need one more perked bomber before any others are added.

The reason for this is primarily that at the moment, our only perked bomber is the Ar-234, which is fun to fly every now and then, however it's usefulness is quite limited.  This is why I support adding next the A-26 Invader as a perked bomber, and then any early-war aeroplane to help out in scenarios.

Yossarian

Boooooo!  No more American bombers until we get something different. :furious
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #13 on: October 09, 2008, 12:31:15 PM »
Boooooo!  No more American bombers until we get something different. :furious
Amen! I'll drink to that.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: ANY early war bomber
« Reply #14 on: October 09, 2008, 01:00:57 PM »
Boooooo!  No more American bombers until we get something different. :furious

Ok, well can you think of any bombers that you would like to see added next that would be perkable?
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ