Re Arn Pad at V Bases and Ports

[BigPlay]

I wouldn't mind seeing re arm pads at both of these bases. I would also like to have damage fixed on aircraft at the re arm pads. The amount of damage equates into the length of time on the pad.

[Spikes]

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,249200.0.html
&
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php?action=search

[VansCrew1]

This is getting worse then the B29& the n00k.

[BigPlay]

This is getting worse then the B29& the n00k.


(Image removed from quote.)

Vans  , why not put your picture in place of the cat. The thought of you offing yourself would be more entertaining for all of us.

[opposum]

Vans  , why not put your picture in place of the cat. The thought of you offing yourself would be more entertaining for all of us.

  YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Denholm]

I will only if the re-arm pads can only service vehicles.

[Spikes]

That is quite dumb if it serviced vehicles. #1 there would be no stopping them from getting unlimited supply, and 2 we already have supplies.

[Chalenge]

Someone in my squad suggested that supplies were tied to ordinance at vehicle fields? If thats so then even rearm pads could be tied in.

[kvuo75]

Someone in my squad suggested that supplies were tied to ordinance at vehicle fields? If thats so then even rearm pads could be tied in.

vehicle supplies are tied to troop barracks. the only ords you can take from a VH is in a ptboat -- rockets and torpedoes, which are tied to the ord bunkers.


oh and the sdk251-whatever.. that has rockets

[SmokinLoon]

No.  Aircraft refuel/re-arm pads are going to be where airplanes come and go.  There are no logistics are veh-bases and ports, not enough to qualify adding the pads.

next.   

[BigPlay]

No.  Aircraft refuel/re-arm pads are going to be where airplanes come and go.  There are no logistics are veh-bases and ports, not enough to qualify adding the pads.

next.   

Hence "Wishlist"

[VansCrew1]

Vans  , why not put your picture in place of the cat. The thought of you offing yourself would be more entertaining for all of us.

 

[NHawk]

No.  Aircraft refuel/re-arm pads are going to be where airplanes come and go.  There are no logistics are veh-bases and ports, not enough to qualify adding the pads.

Hence "Wishlist"

He is saying in real life there would be no aviation fuel or ammo canisters for an airplane at a GV base. Why should we have them in the game?

At a port...well I'd say maybe. After all, carriers got their fuel and ammo from somewhere. But then again, not all ports had airfields. So, the likelihood of them having the tankers or nozzles to fuel a plane would be close to none.

This topic has been beaten to death many times.

[glock89]

Vans  , why not put your picture in place of the cat. The thought of you offing yourself would be more entertaining for all of us.

 

[BigPlay]

He is saying in real life there would be no aviation fuel or ammo canisters for an airplane at a GV base. Why should we have them in the game?

At a port...well I'd say maybe. After all, carriers got their fuel and ammo from somewhere. But then again, not all ports had airfields. So, the likelihood of them having the tankers or nozzles to fuel a plane would be close to none.

This topic has been beaten to death many times.

  Since when has any part of this game represent real life.  When did ports have tanks defending it. Most ports had airfields for the carrier based planes to land at when the CV was at port. Not saying that there should be planes at a port but a  runway and rearm pad would make sence.