« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Variants  (Read 1272 times)

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Variants
« Reply #15 on: October 15, 2008, 02:31:13 PM »
109 G-10 is missing Mig 3 would be great to have.
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Variants
« Reply #16 on: October 15, 2008, 02:37:01 PM »
The MiG3 is not a variant of any aircraft in the game, it was developed independently of all other Ru...

C'mon, it wasn't even made by the same design bureau as any planes we have in game, wtf?
« Last Edit: October 15, 2008, 02:38:48 PM by Motherland »
Logged

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Variants
« Reply #17 on: October 15, 2008, 02:37:27 PM »
Quote from: Motherland on October 15, 2008, 02:37:01 PM
The MiG3 is not a variant of any aircraft in the game, it was developed independently of all other Rus...

C'mon, it wasn't even made by the same design bureau, wtf?
Im just saying don't have to bite my head off.
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Variants
« Reply #18 on: October 15, 2008, 02:47:52 PM »
Quote from: glock89 on October 15, 2008, 02:37:27 PM
Im just saying don't have to bite my head off.

Read the thread before you post and you won't have to worry about anyone ripping your head off.


ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Variants
« Reply #19 on: October 15, 2008, 02:49:22 PM »
Quote from: Ack-Ack on October 15, 2008, 02:47:52 PM
Read the thread before you post and you won't have to worry about anyone ripping your head off.


ack-ack
Ju-88P.
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Variants
« Reply #20 on: October 15, 2008, 02:53:25 PM »
Quote from: Saxman on October 15, 2008, 02:20:16 PM
Ever flown FSO?


On THIS list the real major hole is the lack of an American heavy bomber in the EWA due to only having one variant each of the 17 and 24, and the fact that our Lancaster isn't technically appropriate for that arena, either.

I'd like to see the B-17C be added to fill in the gap for an EW RAF/USAAF bomber and to have another option other than the Lancasters in the EW arena.

And I agree 100% in adding the P-38H.  One can never have too many P-38 variants.


ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Nisky

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Re: Variants
« Reply #21 on: October 15, 2008, 02:53:50 PM »
Sea hurricane MkIIC/MkIC just add an arrestor hook, naval radio gear, and catapult spools. Just means the weight difference with the last 2.
Really just fills a gap in CV fighters.
Logged
Quote from: warphoenix on January 18, 2010, 09:36:24 PM
just talk about random stuff but please stay on topic

Recently Touched By The Noodle! ALL HAIL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER!
Pastafarian for life

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Variants
« Reply #22 on: October 15, 2008, 02:54:57 PM »
Motherland,

The issue with the Lanc is, like I said before, that the Lancaster III shouldn't really be in the EWA at ALL. We should have an earlier mark for that, like the I or II. Ours is more appropriately a mid-war ship.

glock,

I think I already mentioned the substantial gap in the Ju-88 line in general.

Ack-Ack,

I think the B-17C or D combined with the B-17F would be the most all-inclusive additions regarding the Flying Fortress. Would give us the early, mid and late run when added to the G we already have. Plus, the F was the workhorse of the USAAF in the early part of the strategic bombing campaign in Europe. The C/D would be most useful for very early PTO setups.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2008, 02:57:00 PM by Saxman »
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Variants
« Reply #23 on: October 15, 2008, 02:56:26 PM »
Quote from: Saxman on October 15, 2008, 02:54:57 PM
Motherland,

The issue with the Lanc is, like I said before, that the Lancaster III shouldn't really be in the EWA at ALL. We should have an earlier mark for that, like the I or II. Ours is more appropriately a mid-war ship.

glock,

I think I already mentioned the substantial gap in the Ju-88 line in general.
Just like saying it. Ki-100 is a variant off of the Ki-61.
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Variants
« Reply #24 on: October 15, 2008, 02:57:32 PM »
Quote from: glock89 on October 15, 2008, 02:56:26 PM
Just like saying it. Ki-100 is a variant off of the Ki-61.

Development of, not variant.
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Variants
« Reply #25 on: October 15, 2008, 02:58:32 PM »
Quote from: Saxman on October 15, 2008, 02:57:32 PM
Development of, not variant.
Oh well it sexy both ways.
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Variants
« Reply #26 on: October 15, 2008, 03:01:21 PM »
Quote from: glock89 on October 15, 2008, 02:56:26 PM
Just like saying it. Ki-100 is a variant off of the Ki-61.

No, it's not.  While the Ki-100 was based on the Ki-61 airframe it was considered to be a new plane model and not a variant of the Tony because of the significant changes to the airframe.


ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Variants
« Reply #27 on: October 15, 2008, 03:02:57 PM »
Quote from: Ack-Ack on October 15, 2008, 03:01:21 PM
No, it's not.  While the Ki-100 was based on the Ki-61 airframe it was considered to be a new plane model and not a variant of the Tony because of the significant changes to the airframe.


ack-ack
Oh well.
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Variants
« Reply #28 on: October 15, 2008, 03:04:32 PM »
Quote from: Saxman on October 15, 2008, 02:54:57 PM


Ack-Ack,

I think the B-17C or D combined with the B-17F would be the most all-inclusive additions regarding the Flying Fortress. Would give us the early, mid and late run when added to the G we already have. Plus, the F was the workhorse of the USAAF in the early part of the strategic bombing campaign in Europe. The C/D would be most useful for very early PTO setups.

Not only would the C be good for early PTO scenarios it would also be good for early war ETO scenarios as the RAF were flying the C in combat as early as the summer of '41.


ack-ack


Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Variants
« Reply #29 on: October 15, 2008, 03:07:17 PM »
We need the early war T-34 with the big bellybutton hatch we got the later T-34/76 with the newer hatches they put on in 1942/1943.
Logged
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »