And a K/D of 6 against buff ain't that difficult to achieve at all. When properly setting up your attacks in a fast, heavily armed plane, it needs much more than an average buff gunner to stop you...
Lusche, his K/S is 6, not K/D. His K/D is actually like 22 or something ridiculous.
I've had tours before see 97 when the number 2 guy gets 148 Lancaster kills!!! I'm thinking to myself wow what a stroke of luck that guy gets. I don't make threads calling the guy out for being a dweeb, I just refined my hunting skills in a 262 to know how the Buff driver thinks.
Reading the map like a book to achieve your ultimate Rank glory is part and parcel of being able to finish number one in any category.
First of all it's obvious you and Amsoil21 are best friends forever. 2nd i didn't make this thread to call him out. I didn't call him out till page 8 as a matter of fact. Never did I accuse him of cheating or vulching a 2nd account. I said i question the legitimacy of his missions which is gaming the system. The entire thread about scoring problems is dedicated to THIS EXACT manipulation of the system. There should either be a) Weight on Points or b) Some sort of Min Missions Flown Formula.
So here's my next stab at the scoring problem! READ UP
Minimum Missions Flown Formula would be as follows: You take your total rank# and divide it by variable Fm (Min Mission Factor) Fm will level off as your mission # goes up.
Fm will be a number that approaches 1 as your missions increase. For example if you have only 10 missions flown, your Fm # will be like 0.5, If you have 30 missions flown your Fm # will be like 0.8 if you have 300 missions flown, your Fm will be 0.9987 or something.
The Fm curve would have to be opinionated at what HTC would deem "reasonable number of missions for a campaign" For example, 1 Mission a day would get you 30 missions, which would probably be good enough for like a 0.8 Fm or something.
Example 1: Amsoil21's Fighter Stats All Ranks Add up to 136. Since he only has 14 missions flown, his Fm would be something like, 0.6 So you take 136/0.6 = 227 which would probably put him somewhere from ranked 8-15 in fighter.
Example 2: Take Steve's Fighter Stats All Ranks Add up to 180. Since he has 137 missions flown, his Fm would be something like, 0.98 So you take 180/0.98 = 184 which would put him top 2 fighter.
Since you all hated my idea to increase the weights of points, what do you think of this idea? This shouldn't penalize you for lack of flight time as long as you fly a very reasonable number of missions for a campaign. It just really penalizes those who only fly in the range of 10-20 missions in a camp trying to score big