Author Topic: Korea? WW1?  (Read 1906 times)

Offline Simaril

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
Korea? WW1?
« on: October 29, 2008, 12:42:45 PM »
Yes, non-convention goers, the topic did come up in the Dallas Q&A session.

No, it didn't start as a question from a rabid fan in the back row -- it showed up in HTs and Pyro's discussion of the kind of "garage projects" they've tinkered with and not completed!

I think it was Pyro who said they have roughed in the flight models of the Mig17 and F86, and that they weren't all that tough to put together. They've even included WW2 1946 imaginary setups in their internal list of "gee, wouldn't it be cool if" projects.


Again, the bottom line for the discussion was that HTC feels the workload of CT drew away from their core business in the arenas. They look at developing new planes the same way they look at advertising -- a necessary expense that gives a return even though it's devilishly hard to track the returns. As far as they're concerned it didn't seem to matter whether we're talking about the Saber or the Brewster, hot rod or "boutique" plane like the Brewster -- new stuff is part of the package.

So when the time comes, it wouldn't be all that surprising to see some interesting variations on the standard arena setups.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2008, 12:46:29 PM by Simaril »
Maturity is knowing that I've been an idiot in the past.
Wisdom is realizing I will be an idiot in the future.
Common sense is trying to not be an idiot right now

"Social Fads are for sheeple." - Meatwad

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1226
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2008, 12:55:46 PM »
I think it was Pyro who said they have roughed in the flight models of the Mig17 and F86, and that they weren't all that tough to put together.

That is something I would really like to see happen. I enjoyed the Korean arena in AW very much, even though it wasn't very heavily subscribed. Well to be honest, it was often almost empty. But I do miss it, and would like to be able to fly the F86 once again.

Badboy   <sighs and fights off a wave of nostalgia>
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired

Offline toonces3

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 799
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2008, 12:59:55 PM »
Well, if CT died so that we can eventually get some new arena action like WW1 or Korea, then I say that is a smart move for HTC and staff.  And, if I had to choose one or the other, I would pick the WW1 and/or Korea over CT.

Over the last few days I've been playing an older WW1 title.  I can't believe how fun it is!  It is similar, but also alot different than the fighting we have in LW MA right now.  I think it (or Korea for that matter) would be a terrific addition to the game, and I think it would attract a dedicated following. 

Seems to me that HTC has already done all the hard work.  Adding in some new planes should be relatively easy at this point.

"And I got my  :rocklying problem fix but my voice is going to inplode your head" -Kennyhayes

"My thread is forum gold, it should be melted down, turned into minature f/a-18 fighter jets and handed out to everyone who participated." -Thrila

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2008, 01:03:15 PM »
I would pay an extra monthly fee for a WWI arena.  Korean war...  Not interested.

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline Wyld45

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 283
      • AH2 Rough Rider Bugler
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2008, 09:04:47 PM »
I would pay an extra monthly fee for a WWI arena.  Korean war...  Not interested.

                   Im with Dave on the "WWI" era. Other than "MASH", I have no
                   interest in a Korean-Arena at all. "I'd walk a mile for a Camel."
RRWyld45  1138th "Rough Riders" Bomber Wing

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2008, 09:09:10 PM »
I would pay an extra monthly fee for a WWI arena.  Korean war...  Not interested.

What he said.   I concur emphatically.
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Online The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18240
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2008, 09:12:20 PM »
I think we have too many jets as it is!

Offline SIK1

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3759
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2008, 09:15:42 PM »
Another vote for WWI.
444th Air Mafia since Air Warrior
Proudly flying with VF-17 The Jolly Rogers

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG54

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3910
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2008, 09:32:51 PM »
Frankly, I think they are better off updating many of the portions of the game that have lagged.  If anything, the CT experience showed they are better off being the best at one thing before trying to be everything.  When you have limited resources own your core competency then consider other options.

Offline Buzzard7

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 601
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2008, 09:39:59 PM »
I would fly them both. Bi-planes would be fun but the bases would have to be close together to keep interest.
Something about the slow speed of the camel. Korea we would get the chance to fly the last great dogfighters. Maybe throw in some AtoG stuff with the F4u5 and Skyraiders. How about the F2G1?? Let people fly for the US and see what its like to have telephone poles thrown at you from the ground. Or was that only in Vietnam. I don't remember if Korea had SAMs.

Offline Iron_Cross

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2008, 09:44:35 PM »
Cod, I remember Red Baron 3D.  What fun that was online.  YES!!! to WW1, Korean war...eh, not so much.

Offline bobtom

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 478
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2008, 10:16:20 PM »
I would fly them both. Bi-planes would be fun but the bases would have to be close together to keep interest.
Something about the slow speed of the camel. Korea we would get the chance to fly the last great dogfighters. Maybe throw in some AtoG stuff with the F4u5 and Skyraiders. How about the F2G1?? Let people fly for the US and see what its like to have telephone poles thrown at you from the ground. Or was that only in Vietnam. I don't remember if Korea had SAMs.



(drools over F4u5...)

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10470
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2008, 11:16:11 PM »
 Sea Fury.





              :noid

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7294
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2008, 11:41:43 PM »
Korea = B29!!

And you know what that means!!!!
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline 1pLUs44

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3332
Re: Korea? WW1?
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2008, 11:50:33 PM »
I would pay an extra monthly fee for a WWI arena.  Korean war...  Not interested.

Korean war would be interesting, getting the F4U4C and doing ground attack, newer tanks, M-26 Pershing, F-86/Mig 15 would probably = Perk (There were reports of the Chinese/North Koreans flying P-63s during the Korean war, I'm also not sure about other planes)

WW1 would be good just because you honestly couldn't do too much more except fight honestly... (I bet it would be harder to win a Head On pass with only 1, or 2 .303 machine guns)

It would also be the type of thing to where if you rammed, you'd both die.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2008, 12:53:54 AM by 1pLUs44 »
No one knows what the future may bring.