« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: IL2  (Read 1831 times)

Offline BiPoLaR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4132
IL2
« on: October 30, 2008, 01:37:53 PM »
The new il2 is WAY to powerful. It blowing tanks up with ease left and right.Gun only. :furious
Logged
R.I.P. T.E.Moore (Dad) 9-9-45 - 7-16-10.
R.I.P. Wes Poss  (Best Friend) 11-14-75 - 5-2-14

Offline Sunka

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • http://www.327th.com/
Re: IL2
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2008, 01:41:32 PM »
Logged
Someday the mountain might getem but the law nvr will. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SP5EkvOGMCs

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10123
Re: IL2
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2008, 01:42:45 PM »
Quote from: BiPoLaR on October 30, 2008, 01:37:53 PM
The new il2 is WAY to powerful. It blowing tanks up with ease left and right.Gun only. :furious


I used to be fearless in vehicles, now I try to make myself real small when one is around! 
Logged
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Iron_Cross

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
Re: IL2
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2008, 01:48:19 PM »
Logged

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Re: IL2
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2008, 01:57:57 PM »
I took one up after getting annihilated in a Wirbel, with the 37s loadout. It pwnz tanks.
Logged
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4171
Re: IL2
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2008, 02:08:11 PM »
I actually like the smaller cannons, prefer the lighter weight.
Logged

Offline BiPoLaR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4132
Re: IL2
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2008, 02:11:04 PM »
Quote from: hubsonfire on October 30, 2008, 01:57:57 PM
I took one up after getting annihilated in a Wirbel, with the 37s loadout. It pwnz tanks.
pwnz would be an understatement. It Rapes them.
few pings and p00f, you're dead. Its ridiculous
Logged
R.I.P. T.E.Moore (Dad) 9-9-45 - 7-16-10.
R.I.P. Wes Poss  (Best Friend) 11-14-75 - 5-2-14

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: IL2
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2008, 02:38:06 PM »
When can we have them on a Stuka?

It is much sexier that a IL-2

It looks like an evil insect.   :devil
Logged
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: IL2
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2008, 02:48:55 PM »
Not only are the cannons uber the thing is immune to pintle gun fire.
Logged
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline avionix

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1088
Re: IL2
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2008, 02:50:19 PM »
Quote from: BaldEagl on October 30, 2008, 02:48:55 PM
Not only are the cannons uber the thing is immune to pintle gun fire.

It was almost immune to pintle gun before IIRC. 
Logged
treekilr in game.   
"Please. This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker and argue over who killed who..."

Offline Getback

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6364
Re: IL2
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2008, 02:56:30 PM »
Quote from: Sunka on October 30, 2008, 01:41:32 PM
(Image removed from quote.)

 :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

I was killed by one the other day. They were tank busters. The Germans called them black death. Frankly the werble needs an equalizer and you need something to defend against a horde of gv's when your ammo is disabled.
Logged

  Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: IL2
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2008, 03:03:33 PM »
Quote from: Getback on October 30, 2008, 02:56:30 PM
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

I was killed by one the other day. They were tank busters. The Germans called them black death. Frankly the werble needs an equalizer and you need something to defend against a horde of gv's when your ammo is disabled.


So, if you couldn't defend against someone taking out your ord, you should still be afforded a way to beat back the GV's that works as well as bombs do?   
Logged
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline BoSoxFan

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 133
Re: IL2
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2008, 04:01:54 PM »
Quote from: VonMessa on October 30, 2008, 03:03:33 PM

So, if you couldn't defend against someone taking out your ord, you should still be afforded a way to beat back the GV's that works as well as bombs do?   


Better then bombs. You can take a tiger out in one pass with the IL-2's uber taters. On the other hand it takes great aim to kill a tiger with bombs unless you dive bomb it with heavys.
Logged

Offline Getback

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6364
Re: IL2
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2008, 04:21:56 PM »
Quote from: VonMessa on October 30, 2008, 03:03:33 PM

So, if you couldn't defend against someone taking out your ord, you should still be afforded a way to beat back the GV's that works as well as bombs do?   

I guess that is up for discussion. Like your point though and may give it some thought.
Logged

  Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: IL2
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2008, 04:25:05 PM »
I got HO'd and rammed twice today by fast agile fighters who not only had complete tactical superiority but also the numerical advantage. I guess the IL2 is such a threat theres no option other then flying straight into it. :huh
Logged
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »