Author Topic: 262 with bomb in tow.  (Read 1489 times)

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10683
262 with bomb in tow.
« on: November 20, 2008, 04:26:18 PM »
This is not so much a wish but more of a a question to any one who knows how on earth did they hit targets with this set up?  http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/album/showphoto.php?photo=8689&cat=595

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2008, 04:39:54 PM »
No clue, just a guess. Radio guided?
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline PFactorDave

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4334
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2008, 04:42:58 PM »
I'm sure that was just a little ride along set up for the pilot's kid.  Toward the end of the war, the Luftwaffe was short on pilots and had to allow new recruits to bring their kids to work to attract new flyers.  :D
« Last Edit: November 20, 2008, 04:50:42 PM by PFactorDave »

1st Lieutenant
FSO Liaison Officer
Rolling Thunder

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23922
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2008, 05:17:20 PM »


Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2008, 05:18:30 PM »
No clue, just a guess. Radio guided?
That's what I was thinking, as well.

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10683
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2008, 05:29:18 PM »

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2008, 06:17:50 PM »
Are they bombs mounted as well on the belly?

Nope, just the two engines and the rear landing gear is all I see in the first picture around where you'd expect to see bombs
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline transam1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2008, 07:05:23 AM »
The History channel had footage of JU-88's launching wire guided anti ship missiles. Maybe its the same idea.
Vf4nik8r   VF-31tomcatters

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10683
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2008, 08:19:22 AM »
Nope, just the two engines and the rear landing gear is all I see in the first picture around where you'd expect to see bombs
The two black tubes just behind the landing gear in between the engines.

Offline colmbo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
      • Photos
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2008, 01:31:52 PM »
It's just a bomb, they could aim like any other bomb.  You would know it's ballistic characteristics...release it at the right spot it goes where you want.
Columbo

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."

Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" and the warrior whispers back "I AM THE STORM"

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #10 on: November 21, 2008, 01:40:25 PM »
That looks like it could be a glider bomb........  Start high and far, begin a gradual decent, fix on target, gain a little more speed and release the cable.  Glider bomb wing design was to maintain the target vector only, no adjustments could be made and wind would ruin the chance of a good drop by most of what the Luftwaffe had left....   Then again........ That could be a fuel tank.  

262 bombing was done by the KG 54, but details are so few it is tough to know for sure how they were bombing.

The black tubes are probably R4M rockets, making the photo a 262 A-1a/R-1.
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline avionix

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1093
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #11 on: November 21, 2008, 02:04:44 PM »
I will go out on a limb here. 

Could it be a conventional bomb fitted with an aerodynamic wing to give some lift and then once on target, it would be dropped and the wing fall off and it acts conventionally again?

Sorry for the runon sentence.
treekilr in game.   
"Please. This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker and argue over who killed who..."

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #12 on: November 22, 2008, 03:08:05 AM »
Then again........ That could be a fuel tank.

Ya know, thats just crazy enough to work! It would certainly extend the range of a 262 by at list a little bit... Any chances it IS a fuel tank?

Offline chris3

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
      • http://www.ludwigs-hobby-seite.de/
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #13 on: November 22, 2008, 05:02:18 AM »
moin

This was only a test program to find a save way to use the 262 as an attacker because they were afraid about the high speed she get in a dive. it was only a glide bomb not radio teleguidet or cabel. this test program failed and lately they dissident to use the 262 like they were made for ...as a fighter. but there are many more test variants for the example the 262 with a glass nose for the bombgunner. or the interceptor variant with to mounted 163 engine's on the turbines...

cu chris3

Offline macerxgp

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 333
Re: 262 with bomb in tow.
« Reply #14 on: November 22, 2008, 05:17:00 PM »
I'm sure that was just a little ride along set up for the pilot's kid.  Toward the end of the war, the Luftwaffe was short on pilots and had to allow new recruits to bring their kids to work to attract new flyers.  :D
A kid, towed not 30 feet behind two jet engines?  :huh


I'm pretty sure that would scare away more recruits than it would attract. :rolleyes:
Quote from: Saurdaukar
Operational kettles in August 2009 exceed operational pots by approximately 142%.

Your comparison is invalid.

DeMaskus
357th-Death Dragons